https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812121
Andy Grover agro...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812132
Andy Grover agro...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844817
--- Comment #6 from Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com ---
Hi,
Please don't fix the wrong-file-end-of-line problems on the gems. On one of
my other reviews Vic stated that this is a false positive on ruby gems and that
he is working on fixing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839142
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819687
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #17 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760696
--- Comment #14 from Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-mongo/rubygem-mongo.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-mongo/rubygem-mongo-1.4.0-6.fc18.src.rpm
- Added tests (%check
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839142
Tomas Dabašinskas tdaba...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846481
Lameire Alexis alexisis-pristont...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846481
Lameire Alexis alexisis-pristont...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846481
Lameire Alexis alexisis-pristont...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846481
Lameire Alexis alexisis-pristont...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845852
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
added PATCH0 for resolve this problem
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845852
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
tested on http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4367834
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846540
Bug ID: 846540
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846540
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845379
Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839056
--- Comment #2 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr ---
ping ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846556
Bug ID: 846556
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846558
Bug ID: 846558
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841662
Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846558
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846556
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845799
--- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
* Use %global instead of %define
- Unless there is any special need, the %global macro should be used in place
of %define according to FPG [1]
* Test suite
- It would be nice to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846540
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||846556
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846556
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||846540
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846561
Bug ID: 846561
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846562
Bug ID: 846562
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846556
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||846558
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841662
--- Comment #5 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
Looking at config.m4 : this package requires php 5.2.0 (despite web site says
5.1.6) and freetype library, so need
BuildRequires: php-devel = 5.2.0
BuildRequires: freetype-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846558
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846558
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846558
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
*** APPROVED ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846558
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846558
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846558
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846558
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737735
Floren Munteanu ad...@yqed.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ad...@yqed.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737735
--- Comment #10 from Floren Munteanu ad...@yqed.com ---
I don't think this is the proper approach. Please read my comment:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754978#c25
Regards,
Floren Munteanu
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846562
--- Comment #1 from Gerd Pokorra g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de ---
A successful scratch build in rawhide is at:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4365294
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845596
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||846597
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846597
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||845596
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846597
Bug ID: 846597
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846597
--- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk ---
This was already reviewed once. It was retired in bug #843227 because it FTBFS,
pending for a new dependency bug #845596
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760696
--- Comment #15 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #14)
- Added tests (%check section)
Hrm, although you added tests, you should ensure that they are executable in
mock. There is no BR for rubygem(minitest), so the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846562
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833494
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833494
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844080
--- Comment #11 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespec/libmatecomponent.spec
SRPM URL:
http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/materpms/srpms/libmatecomponent-1.4.0-3.fc17.src.rpm
Description:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821094
--- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter m...@fabian-affolter.ch ---
(In reply to comment #3)
The build fails in Rawhide:
In file included from ../utils.c:62:0:
/usr/include/sys/sysctl.h:63:25: fatal error: bits/sysctl.h: No such file or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828809
Wesley Hearn whe...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838901
--- Comment #14 from Jiri Popelka jpope...@redhat.com ---
rpmlint output still lists some isssues, for example:
the non-executable-script error could be avoided with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844080
--- Comment #12 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
$ rpmlint libmatecomponent.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint libmatecomponent-1.4.0-3.fc17.src.rpm
libmatecomponent.src: W: spelling-error
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759855
Kit Gerrits kitgerr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kitgerr...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846212
--- Comment #11 from Christophe Burgun jo...@fedoraproject.org ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
Do you know how to test your lib ?
I have install it but don't know how to test it
The package includes a test suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833494
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i |
|t)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845379
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com ---
ah f18 has branched
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: eclipse-swtbot
Short Description: UI and functional testing tool for SWT and Eclipse based
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759855
--- Comment #19 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com ---
SPEC URL: http://wangee.opsyx.com/sslh.spec
SRPM URL: http://wangee.opsyx.com/sslh-1.10-4.fc16.src.rpm
I can't access these.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759855
--- Comment #20 from Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com ---
I would suggest continuing the usual practice of using chkconfig and
service to do this:
That's correct. For = EL6 it needs to follow these guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833494
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833494
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(puntogil@libero.i |
|t)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846660
Bug ID: 846660
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: 17
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846660
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||840149
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||846660
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828458
Wesley Hearn whe...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||whe...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828444
Wesley Hearn whe...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||828458
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828458
Wesley Hearn whe...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||828444
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846661
Bug ID: 846661
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845799
--- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com ---
Updated:
Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rubygem-hashr/rubygem-hashr.spec
SRPM URL:
http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rubygem-hashr/rubygem-hashr-0.0.21-2.fc17.src.rpm
Fixed:
* Use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846660
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|17 |rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846661
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||846660 (mate-dialogs)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846660
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||846661
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846661
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||libmatenotify
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846661
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dw...@infradead.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840149
Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||846661 (libmatenotify)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846660
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846662
Bug ID: 846662
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846661
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846661
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846562
--- Comment #2 from Gerd Pokorra g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de ---
I fixed an error in the description.
I put the new spec file and new SRPM on our FTP-server.
So the new URLs of it are:
Spec: http://ftp.uni-siegen.de/review/nqp_2.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846662
Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833494
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833494
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784359
Ernie eal...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846662
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
C/C++
[x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: MUST Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845799
--- Comment #4 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Fixed:
* Use %global instead of %define
* Test suite
* License
* -doc subpackage
* Please use the new RubyGems packaging macros
Thank you.
ad /Please
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828879
--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839142
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Unorphaned devel.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845379
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846558
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846662
--- Comment #3 from Krzysztof Daniel kdan...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: http://kdaniel.fedorapeople.org/ecj/v2/eclipse-ecf.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kdaniel.fedorapeople.org/ecj/v2/eclipse-ecf-3.5.6-2.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846661
--- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com ---
[+] OK
[-] NA
[?] Issue
[+] Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
[+] Spec file matches base package name.
[?] Spec has consistent macro usage.
Please use either
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846661
--- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 603013
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=603013action=edit
Mock build.log for rawhide-x86_64 configuration.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828458
Wesley Hearn whe...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846558
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845799
--- Comment #5 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com ---
Thank you for your suggestion, I really appreciate it.
All issues should be addressed:
Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rubygem-hashr/rubygem-hashr.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846661
--- Comment #4 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com ---
Done as requested.
http://vicodan.fedorapeople.org/matespec/libmatenotify.spec
BTW mate-common SHOULD provide pkgconfg, double check me on this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845703
Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846558
--- Comment #8 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: sonatype-forge-parent
New Branches: f19
Sorry, forgot that the Package Name field was mandatory...
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828800
Wesley Hearn whe...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846661
--- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com ---
1. Please submit updated SRPMs
2. Please add a changelog entry for all changes that you make, so we know
what's happened
3. Does NOT build yet.
--
You are receiving this
1 - 100 of 218 matches
Mail list logo