https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854596
--- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch ---
Hi Michael,
I do indeed plan to build for EPEL5 as well.
As for the LICENSE file I have requested upstream.
https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=79494
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854176
--- Comment #14 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 610638
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=610638action=edit
Fix runtime requirements for python-pep8 1.3.3
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846206
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846206
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nhn-nanum-gothic-light-fonts-1.000-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nhn-nanum-gothic-light-fonts-1.000-2.fc17
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846206
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nhn-nanum-gothic-light-fonts-1.000-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nhn-nanum-gothic-light-fonts-1.000-2.fc18
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846206
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nhn-nanum-gothic-light-fonts-1.000-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nhn-nanum-gothic-light-fonts-1.000-2.fc16
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847182
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847182
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nhn-nanum-gothic-light-fonts-1.000-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nhn-nanum-gothic-light-fonts-1.000-2.fc17
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847182
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nhn-nanum-gothic-light-fonts-1.000-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nhn-nanum-gothic-light-fonts-1.000-2.fc18
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847182
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nhn-nanum-gothic-light-fonts-1.000-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nhn-nanum-gothic-light-fonts-1.000-2.fc16
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846206
Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772986
--- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se ---
Thank you for looking at this review request.
The reason for including the .la file in the package is stated in a comment in
the spec file:
# This library is opened using
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772989
--- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se ---
Thank you for looking at this review request.
The reason for including the .la file in the package is stated in a comment in
the spec file:
# This library is opened using
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772988
--- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se ---
Thank you for looking at this review request.
The reason for including the .la file in the package is stated in a comment in
the spec file:
# This library is opened using
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854176
--- Comment #15 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Yes, python-pep8 version 1.3 is in f18 (and later, including rawhide). That
shouldn't prevent you from doing the tests. Esp. it's definitely possible
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854176
--- Comment #16 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
## Koji Build F18 ##
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4462885
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855283
Bug ID: 855283
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854596
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850489
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850489
--- Comment #3 from Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com ---
Shakthi,
Please provide a different summary for the package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850489
Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RELEASE_PENDING
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855283
Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850489
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851583
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831116
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831116
Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RELEASE_PENDING
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854132
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850489
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RELEASE_PENDING |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850489
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ghc-HSH-2.0.4-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-HSH-2.0.4-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850489
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ghc-HSH-2.0.4-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-HSH-2.0.4-2.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850489
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ghc-HSH-2.0.4-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-HSH-2.0.4-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854132
Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RELEASE_PENDING
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841753
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845769
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
emacs-undo-tree-0.5.3-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845769
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
emacs-undo-tree-0.5.3-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851747
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851848
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850789
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847484
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845057
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17
stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845673
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829015
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845673
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Test-File-ShareDir-0.3.1-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847484
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mediawiki-HTTP302Found-2.0.1-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845134
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
emacs-goto-chg-1.4-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850789
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
babeld-1.3.4-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850548
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853050
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845134
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
emacs-goto-chg-1.4-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847406
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=848213
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845057
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Sub-Exporter-Progressive-0.001006-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16
stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847406
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
clean-extra-utils-0.1-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831116
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854132
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855331
Bug ID: 855331
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: medium
Version: rawhide
Priority: medium
CC: nott...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844299
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||855331
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772986
Adam Huffman bl...@verdurin.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855331
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||844299, 841833
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=841833
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||855331
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844299
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|855331 |
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855331
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|844299 |
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831116
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RELEASE_PENDING |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831116
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ghc-MonadRandom-0.1.6-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-MonadRandom-0.1.6-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831116
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ghc-MonadRandom-0.1.6-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-MonadRandom-0.1.6-1.fc16
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831116
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ghc-MonadRandom-0.1.6-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-MonadRandom-0.1.6-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855331
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772988
Adam Huffman bl...@verdurin.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772989
Adam Huffman bl...@verdurin.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854132
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RELEASE_PENDING |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854132
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ghc-show-0.4.1.2-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-show-0.4.1.2-2.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854132
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ghc-show-0.4.1.2-2.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-show-0.4.1.2-2.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854132
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
ghc-show-0.4.1.2-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-show-0.4.1.2-2.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=808350
Robert Knight kni...@princeton.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kni...@princeton.edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844173
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
emacs-evil-0.1-0.3.20120902gitc13b90e.fc18 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/emacs-evil-0.1-0.3.20120902gitc13b90e.fc18
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844173
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
emacs-evil-0.1-0.3.20120902gitc13b90e.fc17 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/emacs-evil-0.1-0.3.20120902gitc13b90e.fc17
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844173
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
emacs-evil-0.1-0.3.20120902gitc13b90e.fc16 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/emacs-evil-0.1-0.3.20120902gitc13b90e.fc16
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828720
Lakshmi Narasimhan lakshminaras2...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828720
--- Comment #4 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com ---
I'll provide a patch to fix the FSF address before import, and also send it
upstream. Will also request upstream to provide a man page.
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828720
Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RELEASE_PENDING
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828720
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854256
--- Comment #2 from Erik Hugne erik.hu...@ericsson.com ---
Thanks for the prompt feedback.
I have adressed your comments, and have one open question regarding the
license.
Is it required to have this as a separate file?
All files in tipcutils
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828720
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RELEASE_PENDING |MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828720
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
brainfuck-0.1-3.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/brainfuck-0.1-3.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828720
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
brainfuck-0.1-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/brainfuck-0.1-3.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828720
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
brainfuck-0.1-3.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/brainfuck-0.1-3.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830328
--- Comment #10 from Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #8)
It just needs to be decided if gnome-initial-setup has a runtime dependency
on gnome-session and polkit.
A runtime dep on gdm would probably be more to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855283
Jason A. Donenfeld ja...@zx2c4.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ja...@zx2c4.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855283
--- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
I wasn't aware that there was a standard unix password manager. Which standard
defines this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855283
--- Comment #3 from Jason A. Donenfeld ja...@zx2c4.com ---
I think the idea is that it uses standard unix tools to achieve its aim. In any
case, the description in the .spec appears to be: stores, retrieves,
generates, and synchronizes passwords
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855283
--- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
The %description is indeed accurate. The Summary:, however, describes this as
some sort of standard. Nice marketing for the upstream project, perhaps, but
we should avoid misleading the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855283
--- Comment #5 from Christophe Fergeau cferg...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: http://teuf.fedorapeople.org/reviews/pass/pass.spec
SRPM URL: http://teuf.fedorapeople.org/reviews/pass/pass-1.1.3-1.fc17.src.rpm
Updated the short description, and updated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854176
--- Comment #17 from Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #13)
1.3.3 will be in rawhide within a day. Do you need it in F18 as well?
Thanks Ian
I did run the test in f18 with 1.3 , do you recommend?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844775
--- Comment #2 from Luis Bazan bazanlui...@gmail.com ---
SPEC:
http://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-django-dynamite.spec
SRPM:
http://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-django-dynamite-0.4.1-4.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855283
--- Comment #6 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
Looking at the source code, there is a call to qdus, but qt is not in Requires.
There is also a call to pwgen, and not in Requires either.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855283
--- Comment #7 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
Mhh, forget, pwgen is there
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855283
--- Comment #8 from Luis Bazan bazanlui...@gmail.com ---
This is an informal review
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: EXTRA Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855283
--- Comment #9 from Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org ---
So all is good, except the license file do not contain the full license, just a
note saying the license should be distributed with the tarbll, if not, contact
fsf. Could the license be added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786249
--- Comment #11 from Russell Harrison fed...@russellharrison.com ---
puppet-lint 0.2.1 has been released. I've update my package with the new
version.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749608
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
