https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967396
--- Comment #3 from Anuj More anujmo...@gmail.com ---
Hi Josef,
Thanks for reviewing the package.
I am following these guidelines (set by myself after looking at example specs
and talking to vondruch):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967153
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
phrel-1.0.1-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phrel-1.0.1-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964143
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964143
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-testscenarios-0.4-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-testscenarios-0.4-2.el6
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964143
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
python-testscenarios-0.4-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-testscenarios-0.4-2.fc19
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967338
--- Comment #3 from Anuj More anujmo...@gmail.com ---
The fonts are covered under the SIL Open font license, which is a good license
according to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Font_Licenses
Everything else is MIT.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963175
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957053
--- Comment #1 from HAYASHI Kentaro ken...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to HAYASHI Kentaro from comment #0)
Spec URL:
http://kenhys.fedorapeople.org/groonga-normalizer-mysql/groonga-normalizer-
mysql.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964161
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912878
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883413
--- Comment #8 from Massimo Paladin massimo.pala...@gmail.com ---
Hi Adrien,
yes, here is with the -md5 src rpm:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5436952
I put it here if you want to check it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968183
Bug ID: 968183
Summary: Review Request: perl-experimental - Experimental
features made easy
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968183
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||967830
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867287
František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958344
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mru...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958344
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 754224
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=754224action=edit
Patch to fix the issues from the review
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966865
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-Storable
Short Description: Persistence for Perl data structures
Owners: ppisar jplesnik psabata
Branches:
InitialCC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958344
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
for reference:
SRPM: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-extras-0.0.3-2.fc19.src.rpm
SPEC: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-extras.spec
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964161
Petr Hracek phra...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967945
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961901
Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967332
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967807
--- Comment #3 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com ---
Thanks for the review. Here is fixed version:
Spec URL: http://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/2/stapler.spec
SRPM URL: http://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/2/stapler-1.209-2.fc20.src.rpm
- Exclude
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967807
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--- Comment #4 from Michal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967807
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908842
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mru...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967807
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||967816
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967816
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||967807
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963670
Karsten Hopp kars...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kars...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908842
--- Comment #9 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 754267
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=754267action=edit
patch to unbundle iso8601
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(gia...@gmail.com) |
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968229
Bug ID: 968229
Summary: Review Request: python-testresources - Testresources,
a pyunit extension for managing expensive test
resources
Product: Fedora
Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912878
gray...@archlinux.us changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968229
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||962132
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908842
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||962132
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913200
Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||962132
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967945
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967396
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963670
--- Comment #2 from Karsten Hopp kars...@redhat.com ---
rpmlint libzfcphbaapi-*
libzfcphbaapi.s390x: E: explicit-lib-dependency libhbaapi
libzfcphbaapi.s390x: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) zFCP - Pfc
libzfcphbaapi.s390x: W: spelling-error
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908842
--- Comment #10 from Alan Pevec ape...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Matthias Runge from comment #9)
patch to unbundle iso8601
This is already done in comment 6 version.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968253
Bug ID: 968253
Summary: Review Request: profile-sync-daemon - Offload browser
profiles to RAM for speed a wear reduction
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968253
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912878
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DEFERRED|DUPLICATE
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968253
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913200
--- Comment #6 from Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com ---
I noticed ( Matthais Runge pointed out too), that %check section is missing ?
--
%check
%{__python} setup.py test
--
I added the above to the SPEC file:
Ran a local
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908842
--- Comment #11 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com ---
Please forget #c8 and #c9. It has already been addressed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968257
Bug ID: 968257
Summary: Review Request: jdeparser - Source generator library
for Java
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968257
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963670
--- Comment #3 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz ---
(In reply to Karsten Hopp from comment #2)
[MUST] the explicit-lib-dependency needs to be fixed
[SHOULD] as this package contains a shared library, ldconfig should probably
be run in %post and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968262
Bug ID: 968262
Summary: Review Request: xboxdrv - Userspace Xbox/Xbox360
Gamepad Driver for Linux
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913200
--- Comment #7 from Pádraig Brady pbr...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/grizzly-test-rpms/python-testrepository.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/~pbrady/grizzly-test-rpms/python-testrepository-0.0.15-3.fc18.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968257
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@redhat.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968257
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968257
--- Comment #3 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
OK, gil, please update your spec to the new guidelines or mark yours as
duplicate of this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967187
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: http://cicku.me/wemux.spec
SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/wemux-2.2.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963704
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968257
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
*** Bug 963704 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968257
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963704
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963670
--- Comment #4 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz ---
* Wed May 29 2013 Dan Horák dan[at]danny.cz - 2.12
- add missing compatibility Provides
- exclude plugin soname from Provides
updated spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/libzfcphbaapi.spec
updated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968273
Bug ID: 968273
Summary: Review Request: jaxws-maven-plugin - Maven plugin for
JAX-WS RI
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=915864
--- Comment #11 from Gang Wei gang@intel.com ---
Spec URL: http://gwei3.fedorapeople.org/package_review/oat/v4/oat.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gwei3.fedorapeople.org/package_review/oat/v4/oat-1.6.0-3.fc18.src.rpm
Fixed all issues pointed by Steven
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968273
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961901
Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963670
Karsten Hopp kars...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867287
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964161
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963292
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964161
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967807
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967807
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=867287
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968257
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961907
Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968257
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963670
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967338
--- Comment #4 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com ---
Yes, please. It's sort of required by guidelines. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950296
Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830869
--- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Susi Lehtola from comment #2)
Thanks for the hints, MPI packaging was deep water for me :) So hopefully I got
it right now, any comments are welcome.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968338
Bug ID: 968338
Summary: Review Request: trilead-putty-extension - Extension to
trilead-ssh2 for handling PuTTY keys
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968338
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968339
Bug ID: 968339
Summary: Review Request: ps_mem - Memory profiling tool
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968183
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963670
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963670
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968257
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968257
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968183
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961901
--- Comment #7 from Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com ---
Hi,
I hate to contradict you, but you just got your packages mixed up. You are
pointing me to the mongoid gemspec and validation table.
If you look at the origin gemspec[1] as well as the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961907
Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956712
--- Comment #6 from Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com ---
Well, that is my main concern. I don't know if it's even possible to re-package
openldap without affecting the current one in RHEL-5 or not violating any
policies or guides. What are you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967816
Bug 967816 depends on bug 967807, which changed state.
Bug 967807 Summary: Review Request: stapler - Stapler Java web framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967807
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956712
--- Comment #7 from Laurence Field laurence.fi...@cern.ch ---
Yes, we would like to run an openldap 2.4 server on RHEL5.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956712
--- Comment #5 from Laurence Field laurence.fi...@cern.ch ---
Thanks Jan for this initial feedback. So in principle you see no reason for
this not to be included as long as the packaging is in good shape?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968183
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917139
--- Comment #2 from Troy Dawson tdaw...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/nodejs/nodejs-options.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/nodejs/nodejs-options-0.0.5-1.fc18.src.rpm
- Version
-- Updated to 0.0.5
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908842
--- Comment #12 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com ---
However, avoid-extras.patch bundles a piece of python-extras, which upstream
doesn't do. The correct thing to do is drop that patch and watch bug 958344.
Incidentally, I just need
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966865
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967807
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961907
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
1 - 100 of 293 matches
Mail list logo