https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=890772
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
(In reply to Felix Kaechele from comment #5)
I was thinking about the rpmlint warning regarding unused direct library
dependencies.
Those can be fixed by passing -Wl,--as-needed to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #56 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
1. Drop unique, it's not needed since 2.0, not sure why you added(fault?)?
2. FTBFS:
Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.wKqPtm
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134835
--- Comment #19 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
(In reply to David Parsons from comment #18)
(In reply to Pierre-YvesChibon from comment #16)
(In reply to David Parsons from comment #10)
As for point 3. I had read this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135519
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759712
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
dragonegg-3.4-1.el7.2 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dragonegg-3.4-1.el7.2
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759712
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
dragonegg-3.4-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dragonegg-3.4-2.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135503
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117223
Fl@sh kaperan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|kaperan...@gmail.com
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135528
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135168
David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dd...@cpan.org
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #57 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
bug reported upstream
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nuvola-player/+bug/1363381
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135386
Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113310
--- Comment #20 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com ---
I'm sorry, but it is still broken for me.
I'm doing
$ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 python-libnacl-1.3.2-1.el6.src.rpm
And the build log says:
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135386
--- Comment #1 from Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
[ ] Package contains BR:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039315
--- Comment #58 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de ---
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/nuvolaplayer.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/nuvolaplayer-2.4.2-3.fc20.src.rpm
%changelog
* Sat Aug 30
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117223
--- Comment #1 from Fl@sh kaperan...@gmail.com ---
In spec:
-BuildRequires: qt4-devel
+BuildRequires: gettext-devel
See for:
(fail): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7489556
(succes):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493
--- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
icecat-24.0-14.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/icecat-24.0-14.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493
--- Comment #51 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
icecat-24.0-14.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/icecat-24.0-14.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746754
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746754
--- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
pdfcrack-0.13-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pdfcrack-0.13-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746754
--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
pdfcrack-0.13-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pdfcrack-0.13-1.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746754
--- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
pdfcrack-0.13-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pdfcrack-0.13-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746754
--- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
pdfcrack-0.13-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pdfcrack-0.13-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135700
Bug ID: 1135700
Summary: Review Request: antlr4 - parser generator tool
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051738
Eduardo Mayorga e...@mayorgalinux.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135700
Eduardo Mayorga e...@mayorgalinux.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135700
Eduardo Mayorga e...@mayorgalinux.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113310
--- Comment #21 from Erik Johnson e...@saltstack.com ---
OK, I must have put the wrong file up there, because when I dowloaded the one
from that link I can reproduce the failure.
However, right now, with a proper SRPM, the current
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818964
Pranav Kant pranav...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pranav...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127173
--- Comment #5 from Christian Dersch chrisder...@gmail.com ---
Thank you for your notes! Fixed it.
Spec URL: https://lupinix.fedorapeople.org/packages/liborigin2.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818964
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/staxmate.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/staxmate-2.2.0-2.fc19.src.rpm
- fix build failure on rawhide
Task info:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683150
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
yad-0.27.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yad-0.27.0-1.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683150
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
yad-0.27.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/yad-0.27.0-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840162
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
gkermit-1.00-16.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gkermit-1.00-16.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055366
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
snapraid-6.3-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/snapraid-6.3-2.el7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135700
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117223
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Hi,
It should be a copy paste mistake since this package was built successfully on
my laptop.
I'm afraid I can't upload a new version for now, can you review based on your
BR-corrected
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135168
--- Comment #2 from kc8...@gmail.com ---
I hadn't planned on it, but I reckon I could.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135700
--- Comment #3 from Cooper Clauson ceclau...@hotmail.com ---
(In reply to Eduardo Mayorga from comment #1)
cclauson FAS username does not exist. Is this your first package? In that
case, follow the steps listed in here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442342
Jan ONDREJ ondr...@salstar.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135168
--- Comment #3 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org ---
Okay. Your spec file has a lot of lines in it that are only useful for EPEL5.
Specifically,
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
rm -rf
42 matches
Mail list logo
