https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169115
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-console-browserify-1.1.0-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-console-browserify-1.1.0-1.fc21
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169115
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169115
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-console-browserify-1.1.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-console-browserify-1.1.0-1.fc20
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169115
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-console-browserify-1.1.0-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-console-browserify-1.1.0-1.fc19
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169115
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-console-browserify-1.1.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-console-browserify-1.1.0-1.el7
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119003
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Thank you.
I will push it soon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172971
Bug ID: 1172971
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-duplexer - Creates a duplex
stream
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172969
Bug ID: 1172969
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-pause-stream - A ThroughStream
that strictly buffers all readable events when paused
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172970
Bug ID: 1172970
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-map-stream - Construct pipes of
streams of events
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172973
Bug ID: 1172973
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-from - Easy way to make a
Readable Stream
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172972
Bug ID: 1172972
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-stream-combiner - Turn a
pipeline into a single stream
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172974
Bug ID: 1172974
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-split - Split a text stream
into a line stream
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172968
Bug ID: 1172968
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-event-stream - Construct pipes
of streams of events
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172975
Bug ID: 1172975
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-stream-reduce - Reduce stream
data to a single value
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172977
Bug ID: 1172977
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-nano - Minimalistic couchdb
driver for Node.js
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172976
Bug ID: 1172976
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-follow - Extremely robust,
fault-tolerant CouchDB changes follower
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172977
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172976
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1172977
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172976
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172968
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172975
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172968
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1172969
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172969
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1172968, 956806
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172972
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1172968, 956806
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172970
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1172968, 956806
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172968
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1172971
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172968
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1172972
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172973
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1172968, 956806
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172968
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1172970
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172971
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1172968, 956806
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172968
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1172974
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172974
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1172968, 956806
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172968
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1172973
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172705
Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172705
Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170069
--- Comment #1 from Juan Orti juan.o...@miceliux.com ---
Spec URL:
https://jorti.fedorapeople.org/python-django-database-url/python-django-database-url.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172525
--- Comment #2 from amigo.el...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
It's best not to use temporary places like fpaste for spec files. If you
don't have better place, attach it to this bug.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172414
--- Comment #2 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org ---
Well,
* Documentation
- At least please add COPYING as %license
- Also, please consider to add some files to %doc, such
as README.
* Licensing issue
- See above
*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114737
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170213
--- Comment #1 from Juan Orti juan.o...@miceliux.com ---
Spec URL: https://jorti.fedorapeople.org/modoboa/modoboa.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jorti.fedorapeople.org/modoboa/modoboa-1.2.0-0.rc1.fc21.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168017
--- Comment #12 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms ---
The pdf is already there (from tarball). So I only convert the tex file to some
html (by texi2html).
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168017
--- Comment #13 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #12)
The pdf is already there (from tarball). So I only convert the tex file to
some html (by texi2html).
Yes, but that file contains only:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172829
--- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
Your package can't be currently built in rawhide:
Transaction check error:
DEBUG util.py:366:file /usr/lib/libspeexdsp.so.1.5.0 from install of
speex-1.2-0.21.rc1.fc22.i686
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172829
--- Comment #5 from David King amigad...@amigadave.com ---
I just added Conflicts: speex-devel = 1.2-0.21.rc1 to the speexdsp-devel
package, and updated the spec and .src.rpm in place. It will not be possible to
install (not build) speexdsp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142407
--- Comment #13 from Matěj Chalk mch...@redhat.com ---
SPEC: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xchalk00/drpm.spec
SRPM: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xchalk00/drpm-0.1.2-1.fc20.src.rpm
Koji:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107800
--- Comment #5 from Dave Love d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk ---
Yes, I'd spotted the RHEL6.6 MPI disaster area... There's a previous build for
it
under http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/loveshack/livhpc/build/60827/ but I'd
forgotten to sort out
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060436
Jon Ludlam j...@recoil.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j...@recoil.org
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142407
--- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
/sbin/ldconfig -N -n %{buildroot}%{_libdir} didn't fix symlink to buildroot
error.
What build target you refer to? That command is not supposed to create a
symlink to buildroot:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171748
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1171749
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171749
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1171748
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171750
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1171749
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171749
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1171750
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173109
Bug ID: 1173109
Summary: Review Request: python-pint - Physical quantities
module
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172771
Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vasc...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172816
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172829
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172816
--- Comment #2 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com ---
- You should use explicit %{__python2} macro instead of plain python (or use
%{__python3, if you can ;))
- The note about this being a Red Hat maintained package and thus source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172829
--- Comment #7 from David King amigad...@amigadave.com ---
Thanks! I fixed the tabs-vs-spaces warning, again updating the files in place.
I will wait for confirmation from the speex maintainer for the package split in
bug 1172820 before filing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172771
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ludlam j...@recoil.org ---
Thanks Vasiliy. Should I bump the release number when I do?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172771
--- Comment #4 from Vasiliy Glazov vasc...@gmail.com ---
Yes. And create new post with updated Spec URL and SRPM URL. It must contain
changes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172816
--- Comment #3 from Martin Kolman mkol...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda from comment #2)
- You should use explicit %{__python2} macro instead of plain python (or
use %{__python3, if you can ;))
The build script works
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172771
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ludlam j...@recoil.org ---
Fixed, thanks.
Spec URL: http://www.recoil.org/~jon/ocaml-cmdliner.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.recoil.org/~jon/ocaml-cmdliner-0.9.6-2.fc21.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172771
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ludlam j...@recoil.org ---
Also, koji link: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8348613
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172705
--- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
It should link stuff from kde-plasma-networkmanagement-libs,
Querying pkg from scratch build:
$ rpm -qRp kde-plasma-networkmanagement-openvpn-0.9.0.9-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172705
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Package Review |Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172829
David King amigad...@amigadave.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172525
--- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Looks good.
You might want to consider adding %global _hardened_build 1,
since the program processes untrusted input
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172816
Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142407
--- Comment #15 from Matěj Chalk mch...@redhat.com ---
SPEC: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xchalk00/drpm.spec
SRPM: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xchalk00/drpm-0.1.2-1.fc20.src.rpm
Koji:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173159
Bug ID: 1173159
Summary: Review Request: libsbml - Systems Biology Markup
Language library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547427
Joshua Roys roysj...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142407
Tomas Mlcoch tmlc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121358
--- Comment #13 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
Let's try this version instead:
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: xmlrpc-epi
New Branches: f21 devel
Owners: spstarr rdieter
InitialCC:
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121358
--- Comment #14 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: xmlrpc-epi
New Branches: f21 devel
Owners: spstarr rdieter
InitialCC:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905304
--- Comment #58 from Patrick Laimbock patr...@laimbock.com ---
Adam: no idea. The 1.3.0 version with built-in SPF checks worked fine for me.
But version 1.3.0 is pretty old as OpenDKIM is currently at version 2.9.2. So
it first should be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173159
--- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Tests fail on i686... I'll try to get this fixed, and disable the tests
otherwise.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875
--- Comment #16 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
(In reply to Michel Alexandre Salim from comment #15)
Meanwhile, let's continue the review on the assumption that an exemption
will be granted (the other packages that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171302
--- Comment #5 from Piotr Popieluch piotr1...@gmail.com ---
Parag
I've updated uploaded all my nodejs-*case* packages:
- deleted group tag
- replaced istanbul with istanbul-js
I didn't bump the version numbers.
I expect some BuildRequires
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173203
Bug ID: 1173203
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-npm-stats - Convenience module
for getting back data from an NPM registry
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173205
Bug ID: 1173205
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-dependency-lister - Lists your
module's dependencies with URLs and licenses
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173204
Bug ID: 1173204
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-as-number - Tiny function that
returns the given number, or a default value
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173206
Bug ID: 1173206
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-minstache - Mini mustache
template engine
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173205
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173204
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1173205
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173206
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1173205
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173203
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1173205
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173203
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173206
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173204
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172977
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1173203
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173203
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1172968, 1172975, 1172977
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172968
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1173203
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172975
Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1173203
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142407
Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(bugs.michael@gmx. |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905304
--- Comment #59 from Adam Williamson (Red Hat) awill...@redhat.com ---
Patrick: this is OpenDMARC, not OpenDKIM :) OpenDMARC is still at 1.3.0
upstream.
the systemd snippets are at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989791
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989792
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989791
Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||201449
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115299
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115299
Bug 1115299 depends on bug 1113916, which changed state.
Bug 1113916 Summary: Review Request: python-remoto - Execute remote commands or
processes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113916
What|Removed
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo