https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185301
Mathieu Bridon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||boche...@fedoraproject.org
--- Comme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177926
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
smuxi-0.11-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/smuxi-0.11-3.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177926
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
smuxi-0.11-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/smuxi-0.11-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177926
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182261
--- Comment #12 from Richard Shaw ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #9)
> => You need to fix the changelog version-release to
> 1.0-0.1.git.20150114git63c81f0
The first git is redundant, just use:
%global checkout %{date}git%{git_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183235
--- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter ---
Spec URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdeedu-data/kdeedu-data.spec
SRPM URL:
https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kdeedu-data/kdeedu-data-14.12.1-2.fc20.src.rpm
%changelog
* Fri Jan 23 2015 Rex Di
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183235
--- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter ---
This package is common to several kde4 *and* kf5 applications, that's why it
references both, but you're right, adding a dep on hicolor-icon-theme is
strictly needed here (even though all of it's consumers wi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128754
--- Comment #4 from Paulo Andrade ---
I would like some comments about these "= MUST items =":
1. It says License GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ MPLv2
I believe it is LGPLv2.1+ (the icons) and not LGPLv3+. Please verify.
I believe the MPLv2 are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177926
--- Comment #18 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Mirco Bauer from comment #17)
> I explained 2 times why my proposal is the optimal solution. I am not going
> to invest more time on this. Do whatever is right for Fedora. Disclaimer: I
> do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185301
--- Comment #2 from David King ---
Thanks for the review! The AppData guidelines suggest that "validate-relax" is
sufficient (which is included in the spec, and passes locally), although it
would of course be nice if there were a few more para
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184600
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181050
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181050
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121601
--- Comment #29 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121601
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185301
Yanko Kaneti changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yan...@declera.com
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141841
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-googlecode-google-api-client-0-0.4.gitfc402b0.el6 has been submitted as
an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-google-api-client-0-0.4.gitfc40
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141841
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-googlecode-google-api-client-0-0.4.gitfc402b0.fc21 has been submitted as
an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-google-api-client-0-0.4.gitfc402b0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141841
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-googlecode-google-api-client-0-0.4.gitfc402b0.fc20 has been submitted as
an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-google-api-client-0-0.4.gitfc402b0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182261
--- Comment #11 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Thanks Dodji.
Sinny, I see there is no need then to add "BuildRequires: libzip"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128754
Paulo Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128754
Paulo Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185308
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1184910
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185308
Bug ID: 1185308
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-activejob - Job framework with
pluggable queues
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185301
Bug ID: 1185301
Summary: Review Request: gnome-builder - IDE for writing
GNOME-based software
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163816
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163739
Bug 1163739 depends on bug 1163816, which changed state.
Bug 1163816 Summary: Review Request: sonar-runner - Default launcher to analyze
a project with SonarQube
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163816
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158188
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185082
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185281
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185076
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|nob...@fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185281
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1185076, 1185082
Referenced Bugs:
h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185082
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1185281
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185076
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1185281
Referenced Bugs:
https://bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185281
Bug ID: 1185281
Summary: Review Request: golang-google-golangorg-cloud - Go App
Engine for Managed VMs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182261
--- Comment #10 from Dodji Seketeli ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #9)
> 2) I see you actually need libzip not gzip. You can add following
> BuildRequires: libzip
> to enable optional feature.
Thank you for your attention to de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177926
--- Comment #17 from Mirco Bauer ---
I explained 2 times why my proposal is the optimal solution. I am not going to
invest more time on this. Do whatever is right for Fedora. Disclaimer: I don't
know the criteria Fedora uses to split packages,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185275
Bug ID: 1185275
Summary: Review Request: rome-utils - Utility classes for ROME
projects
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: mediu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060436
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ludlam ---
I've made a review request for OPAM without the bundled dependencies here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185099
It depends upon a few other packages, linked to from that ticket.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181050
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183235
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184920
Bug 1184920 depends on bug 1184130, which changed state.
Bug 1184130 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rails-deprecated_sanitizer -
Deprecated sanitizer API extracted from Action View
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184130
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184130
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172414
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktdre...@ktdreyer.com
Flag
101 - 144 of 144 matches
Mail list logo