https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276114
--- Comment #2 from Piotr Popieluch ---
Thanks, updated
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269964
Jan Pokorný changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Rebase clufter package |Rebase clufter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203749
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
dssp-2.2.1-6.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-a0e26542e3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203749
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
dssp-2.2.1-6.el5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 5.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1a8dc2d36d
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203749
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276161
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
jplesnik's scratch build of perl-SQL-SplitStatement-1.00020-2.fc22.src.rpm for
rawhide completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203749
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
dssp-2.2.1-6.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1148a3ae68
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276108
--- Comment #3 from Piotr Popieluch ---
Yes, I took release+one commit to have the license included.
I've updated for option 2.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276161
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274978
Oded Gabbay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ogab...@redhat.co |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265329
Parag Nemade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(pnem...@redhat.co |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276111
--- Comment #3 from Piotr Popieluch ---
I've created a github issue:
https://github.com/mikolalysenko/is-property/issues/3
Not sure what to do with this, the whole module seems to be a generated regex
oneliner.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203749
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
dssp-2.2.1-6.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-add531b6f0
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276161
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268372
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274690
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
nordugrid-arc-gangliarc-1.0.0-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-37a556f5a6
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274690
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
nordugrid-arc-gangliarc-1.0.0-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-37a556f5a6
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260575
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
python-ordered-set-1.3.1-4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079090
--- Comment #66 from Fedora Update System ---
layla-fonts-1.5-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274690
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
nordugrid-arc-gangliarc-1.0.0-2.el5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
EPEL 5. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-b7f714a161
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274690
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
nordugrid-arc-gangliarc-1.0.0-2.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1d8f08342b
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274690
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264546
--- Comment #49 from Gustavo Lima Chaves ---
> I think we are almost done with the review. I would like to have
> an extra comment about my question about if you have an ETA for
> a stable release. For safety,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274978
--- Comment #11 from Oded Gabbay ---
Uploaded new spec and srpm files.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123511
--- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
cleaver's scratch build of nanomsg-0.7-0.1.beta.fc20.src.rpm for rawhide
completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274978
Luya Tshimbalanga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274978
Luya Tshimbalanga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276161
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
This SCM request method has been deprecated. Please see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDB_admin_requests.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274978
Luya Tshimbalanga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274978
Oded Gabbay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ogab...@redhat.co |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274978
--- Comment #14 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
Hmm, I don't see the fix within the spec file. Perhaps you mistakenly sent the
old version.
Could you bump also the srpm to 1.0.0-2 reflecting the change? Thanks.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269609
Richard Shaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478
Till Maas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||opensou...@till.name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275391
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
williamjmorenor's scratch build of wbar-2.3.4-1.fc21.src.rpm for rawhide
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11630491
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274645
--- Comment #4 from William Moreno ---
Looks good
Consider to build the documentation files your selft and include it as Source1
and then just copy it in the BuildRoot, also this documentation must be in a
-docs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269609
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275057
--- Comment #5 from Ralph Bean ---
Latest upstream, with some bugfixes:
Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/SPECS/python-appstream.spec
SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/SRPMS/python-appstream-0.5-1.fc22.src.rpm
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274978
--- Comment #16 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
luya's scratch build of hsakmt-1.0.0-2.fc22.src.rpm for f23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11630452
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275057
--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
williamjmorenor's scratch build of python-appstream-0.5-1.fc22.src.rpm for
rawhide completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198473
Till Maas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1215478
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272669
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274978
Luya Tshimbalanga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123511
Japheth Cleaver changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(cleaver-redhat@te |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269609
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|williamjmore...@gmail.com |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274978
--- Comment #15 from Oded Gabbay ---
done.
Here are the new links:
Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~gabbayo/hsakmt/hsakmt.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.freedesktop.org/~gabbayo/hsakmt/hsakmt-1.0.0-2.fc22.src.rpm
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268380
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
williamjmorenor's scratch build of
python-sphinx-theme-bootstrap-0.4.5-3.fc22.src.rpm for rawhide completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272669
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-pify-2.2.0-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-59c4908f31
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276108
--- Comment #5 from Piotr Popieluch ---
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218758
--- Comment #13 from Richard Shaw ---
Chris, do you see the security issue as a blocker? I suppose I could post the
question to the devel list and get some feedback.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276108
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272669
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-pify-2.2.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-93efc5a2c3
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274996
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275391
--- Comment #5 from William Moreno ---
Are you going to epel5? If not, there is no need of rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in
%%install.
Note than the current spec build fine in epel6, epel7 and current Fedora:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107127
--- Comment #25 from James Hunt ---
How does this look?
https://jamesodhunt.fedorapeople.org/packages/procenv/procenv.spec
https://jamesodhunt.fedorapeople.org/packages/procenv/procenv-0.41-1.fc23.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246761
--- Comment #9 from William Moreno ---
The changelog must be - 6.0-1 and not just - 6.0
I am fine with this package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246761
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275057
--- Comment #9 from William Moreno ---
Sorry for the last to comments, I was looking at the 0.2 version.
I am working with the 0.5 versión but now the epel6 fails in check:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275057
--- Comment #7 from William Moreno ---
This package it is only for epel6? Or you are goint to build for Fedora and
Epel7?
It may be usefull in Fedora, but Python Packaging Guidelines for Fedora have
changed a lot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275057
--- Comment #8 from William Moreno ---
Epel7 and Fedora Builds all then fails in %%chech with python2.7 the check pass
fine with python2.6 in epel6, will yoo go only for epel6?
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268380
--- Comment #6 from William Moreno ---
Please post the last versión of the spec and the src.rpm tin this formats:
Spec URL:
SRPM URL:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274978
Luya Tshimbalanga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807432
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187082
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201338
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205479
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268697
--- Comment #3 from Austin Dunn ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
> What's the homepage of this software?
>
> And can you avoid short name like this? This only indicates that upstream is
> too lazy.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268372
--- Comment #16 from Matthias Runge ---
flake8 is not used during build, pleae remove it as well
I would use truncate -s 0 {test-,}requirements.txt
instead of removing that files
Otherwise looks good.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478
--- Comment #14 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos ---
To add this in Fedora we certainly need a packager who is able to follow up
with the package. I'm willing to review this, or any other review request if we
have that.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274978
--- Comment #7 from Oded Gabbay ---
Because you are using a wrong link.
It's not
https://wiki.freedesktop.org/xorg/archive/individual/lib/hsakmt-1.0.0.tar.bz2
It's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Warmuz ---
I would like to point out that Let's Encrypt team strongly suggests using
tarballs from PyPI and not git master.
https://github.com/letsencrypt/letsencrypt/wiki/Packaging
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187084
Carl van Tonder changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274645
--- Comment #3 from Juan Orti ---
Hi, thanks for taking this review.
I've updated the spec according your suggestions, I have also opened a bug to
ask upstream about the documentation problem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276114
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322
--- Comment #12 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #11)
> (In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #10)
> > (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #6)
> > > From what I've observed, the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274978
Luya Tshimbalanga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268372
--- Comment #17 from Kevin Fox ---
Hi Matthias,
Thanks for the review. I've included the changes. Please find the revisions
below:
Spec URL: http://efox.cc/temp/openstack-app-catalog-ui.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276161
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275411
Robin Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
78 matches
Mail list logo