https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278152
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-base64-url-1.2.1-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2c20751943
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271768
--- Comment #15 from Paul Belanger ---
I figure %global with_python3 0 will be the fix for the moment.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278152
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291007
--- Comment #8 from Jeremy Cline ---
I've bumped the release.
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jeremycline/package-sphinxcontrib-fulltoc/master/python-sphinxcontrib-fulltoc.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278150
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-rndm-1.2.0-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5cc7bb191b
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221536
--- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
tomh's scratch build of nodejs-realize-package-specifier-3.0.1-1.fc23.src.rpm
for f24-nodejs4 completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271768
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(karlthered@gmail. |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221536
--- Comment #8 from Tom Hughes ---
I think I understand most of the test failures now... More to come shortly...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278150
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278150
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-rndm-1.2.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-ae5ff3d0f9
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278152
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-base64-url-1.2.1-2.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-f3c9e87258
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291364
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278150
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-rndm-1.2.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-66dd9daa84
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291539
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||panem...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278152
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-base64-url-1.2.1-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dae06ead71
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278152
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-base64-url-1.2.1-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-ac036635fe
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291364
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-escape-string-regexp-1.0.3-2.el6 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8e55ce770e
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291364
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-escape-string-regexp-1.0.3-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-81b421119e
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221536
--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
tomh's scratch build of nodejs-realize-package-specifier-3.0.1-1.fc23.src.rpm
for f24-nodejs4 completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278150
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-rndm-1.2.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0c9866980a
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291364
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-escape-string-regexp-1.0.3-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7bf11a2625
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221536
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290231
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-nifti-0.0.2-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9a13fa60b9
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270368
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
gil's scratch build of nacl-arm-gcc-4.9.2-6.git336bd0b.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide
completed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290172
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291558
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291403
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291877
Bug ID: 1291877
Summary: Review Request: python-nilearn - Python module for
fast and easy statistical learning on NeuroImaging
data
Product: Fedora
Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258222
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-fd-0.0.2-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-6b847c09fb
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291877
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1276941
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291558
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291403
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
The tests are getting included in the package, and the test require should be
in %check not %build (apart from anything else it needs to be after the
symlink_deps call in general).
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290231
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221536
--- Comment #10 from Tom Hughes ---
The test failures are all down to changes in the semver and npm-package-arg
modules.
I have updated npm-package-arg in the f24-nodejs4 side tag (semver was already
done) and with that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291364
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-escape-string-regexp-1.0.3-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-437bbfd673
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291558
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290172
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187030
--- Comment #15 from Joachim Frieben ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #14)
Since you have already reviewed my initial package and I have addressed your
comments in a new release, why not simply assign it to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187030
--- Comment #16 from Joachim Frieben ---
The new release should resolve the issues raised in comment 11.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291459
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
sysreporter-3.0.0-0.1.alpha3.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-f429bb4c03
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221536
--- Comment #7 from Zuzana Svetlikova ---
*Sources:
Spec URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~zvetlik/nodejs/nodejs-realize-package-specifier/nodejs-realize-package-specifier.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258222
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258222
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-fd-0.0.2-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-25950482e7
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258222
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-fd-0.0.2-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-fcc01e37e0
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291539
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291539
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290172
--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes ---
That %check doesn't do what you think it does...
That doesn't run each file - it runs the first one and passes the other as
arguments. Maybe just do the make test instead?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270368
--- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
* Tue Dec 15 2015 Tom Callaway 4.9.2-6.git336bd0b
- turn bootstrap back on
- mark COPYING as a license file
New SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291558
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
you must add also these missing buildrequires:
mvn(com.google.code.maven-replacer-plugin:replacer)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291403
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291076
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291364
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288541
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1285423
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258222
--- Comment #2 from Piotr Popieluch ---
I think this is timing related as it sometimes succeeds and sometimes fails.
I've set a longer timeout, would you please check again?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290551
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258222
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290345
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291076
--- Comment #4 from Piotr Popieluch ---
I've created the source url according to:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Git_Hosting_Services
Is that incorrect?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277408
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
rubygem-hocon-0.9.3-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291341
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273874
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-balanced-match-0.2.0-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273880
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-concat-map-0.0.1-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281991
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290542
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290499
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258222
--- Comment #4 from Piotr Popieluch ---
thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291076
--- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
I want to take the reference of this line
"Git web-based hosting services provide a mechanism to create tarballs on
demand, either from a specific commit revision, or from a specific
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176
--- Comment #8 from Piotr Kliczewski ---
El6 is supported as well and we build it every time there is change in the code
within this package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290450
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
exonerate-2.2.0-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289860
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258222
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273882
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1044425
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290172
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291916
Bug ID: 1291916
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-spdx-exceptions - A list of
SPDX standard license exceptions
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291916
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291920
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291920
Bug ID: 1291920
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-stream-replace - Replace text
in a stream
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291934
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry Mikhirev ---
Hi Cristopher!
I'm sorry, I had to search for duplicates better... We can cooperate working on
thiis package. Unfortunately your spec and srpm files are currently
unavailable. Was
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270368
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287837
--- Comment #10 from Antonio Trande ---
>> - Since this is not a library, but a CLI tool, shouldn't the package be
>> called borgbackup (or borg)?
>>
> I'm open to that. The whole resides in lib/python../site-packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291921
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291920
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1291921
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291934
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291916
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291920
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291934
Bug ID: 1291934
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-string-dot-prototype-dot-repeat
- A robust & optimized `String.prototype.repeat`
polyfill
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291933
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291938
Bug ID: 1291938
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-commonmark - A strongly
specified, highly compatible variant of Markdown
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273882
--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith ---
I think all of the dependencies are now in Rawhide, so that this package can be
formally reviewed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291076
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-dashdash
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288643
--- Comment #8 from Igor Gnatenko ---
*** Bug 969631 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969631
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291403
--- Comment #3 from Jared Smith ---
Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-os-homedir/nodejs-os-homedir.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291060
--- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt ---
> #Icons
> %dir %{_datadir}/pixmaps/pidgin/protocols/*/
> %{_datadir}/pixmaps/pidgin/protocols/*/telegram.png
The single %dir statement won't be enough as it doesn't cover the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291916
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package does not use a name that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291916
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291933
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291076
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
nodejs-dashdash-1.10.1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-412f7b2fc8
--
You are receiving this
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo