https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328951
--- Comment #6 from Matthew Barnes ---
Thanks for the quick responses!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328892
--- Comment #8 from Matthew Barnes ---
Thanks for the quick responses!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338553
--- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner ---
Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/util/nitroshare.spec
SRPM URL:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/util/nitroshare-0.3.1-1.fc24.src.rpm
%changelog
* Tue Jun
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336773
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341839
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343208
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341815
--- Comment #4 from William Moreno ---
Koji build is failing:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14397295
You are missing a BR:
ERROR: py27: could not install deps [zope.testing,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1339327
--- Comment #5 from Dan Williams ---
Apologies for the delay circling back to this. A couple review items:
1/ fedora-review notices that %{?_smp_mflags} is missing from the make line
2/ I see the addition of:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328951
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334887
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
python-sockjs-tornado-1.0.3-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0bae8d2fe2
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342851
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
xonsh-0.3.3-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9d19409670
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342851
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
xonsh-0.3.3-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a5e9639b93
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342851
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342851
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
xonsh-0.3.3-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e8b0621de0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331914
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Tomas Repik from comment #2)
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
>
> = Issues =
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342737
--- Comment #6 from Till Hofmann ---
Thank you for reviewing!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334887
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
python-sockjs-tornado-1.0.3-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-880b746376
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334887
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343224
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1202425 (LXQt)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094477
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1000885
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343224
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1000885
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342737
Juan Orti changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343224
Bug ID: 1343224
Summary: Review Request: xenlism-wildfire -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328951
--- Comment #4 from Matthew Barnes ---
(In reply to William Moreno from comment #3)
> - Does this package requires commissaire at runtime or can work with remote
> hosts?
commctl talks to commissaire over HTTP so no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343208
Bug ID: 1343208
Summary: Review Request: xfce4-hotcorner-plugin - XFCE4
HotCorner Panel Plugin
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343208
davideol...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328892
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260208
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1343045
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343177
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1343045
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318059
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342737
--- Comment #4 from Till Hofmann ---
Spec URL: https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/btrfs-sxbackup.spec
SRPM URL: https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/btrfs-sxbackup-0.6.6-2.fc23.src.rpm
Thank you for taking this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341642
--- Comment #6 from Ralf Senderek ---
Peter Gutmann's excellent documentation for programmers is included in the doc
package as "manual.pdf". This is the ultimate guide for everyone who will use
cryptlib to enrich their
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295128
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
aws-shell-0.1.1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-231fda10e1
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295128
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
aws-shell-0.1.1-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f2184451c8
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295128
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341642
--- Comment #5 from Ralf Senderek ---
Thanks for the comments,
in the new release 3 the two things are fixed now:
New (release 3)
Spec URL: https://crypto-bone.com/fedora/cryptlib.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312963
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(tcallawa@redhat.c |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341642
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341642
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332307
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
libcxx-3.8.0-3.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-280808acac
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332307
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
libcxx-3.8.0-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4224792a98
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332307
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
libcxx-3.8.0-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-70a8dcb27f
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332307
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
libcxx-3.8.0-3.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-9f912a4d07
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332307
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
libcxx-3.8.0-3.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0146d17f3b
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332307
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342851
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/xonsh
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334888
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-seesaw
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295128
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/aws-shell
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343177
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343177
Bug ID: 1343177
Summary: Review Request: jboss-jaxrs-2.0-api - JAX-RS 2.0: The
Java API for RESTful Web Services
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331914
Tomas Repik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328892
--- Comment #6 from Matthew Barnes ---
Another update to comply (I think) with guidelines for pre-releases.
This satisfies rpmlint's complaint about the invalid version.
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321473
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334888
--- Comment #6 from Ben Rosser ---
That seems to solve the problem, thanks! And thanks for the review. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343161
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343063
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343161
Bug ID: 1343161
Summary: Review Request: cryptacular - Java Library that
complement to the Bouncy Castle crypto API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190735
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342839
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335278
--- Comment #5 from Antonio Trande ---
Is there any valid reason to provide those bundled libraries ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343063
Bug ID: 1343063
Summary: Review Request: artemis - Java high performance,
clustered, asynchronous messaging system
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335278
--- Comment #4 from Julian Sikorski ---
It is a 7zip self extracting archive of the source code, it is considerably
smaller than the zip archive.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342743
--- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande ---
Spec URL:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/sagitter/crawl/crawl.git/plain/crawl.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190740
--- Comment #6 from Michael Simacek ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues
--
- Group tags are obsolete -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190740
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335278
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande ---
http://mamedev.org/downloader.php?file=%{name}0%{baseversion}/%{name}0%{baseversion}s.exe
You are using a pre-compiled file for Windows. Why not the source code instead
?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190735
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190740
Bug 1190740 depends on bug 1190735, which changed state.
Bug 1190735 Summary: Review Request: mycila-pom - Mycila parent POM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190735
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190746
Bug 1190746 depends on bug 1190735, which changed state.
Bug 1190735 Summary: Review Request: mycila-pom - Mycila parent POM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190735
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343025
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343025
Bug ID: 1343025
Summary: Review Request: undertow-js - JavaScript based
handlers for Undertow
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329886
--- Comment #2 from Nikos Roussos ---
Thanks. It seems that I uploaded an old spec.
SPEC: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/specs/dnscrypt-proxy.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342749
Bug 1342749 depends on bug 1342799, which changed state.
Bug 1342799 Summary: jboss-classfilewriter-1.1.2.Final is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342799
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #23 from Raphael Groner ---
Request that the Release Engineering team unblock the package for the releases
that the package should be un-retired for via their trac instance. In this
request, please post a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #22 from MartinKG ---
I have a problem with unretire the package
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/D5BNMGEGDFXAHXQAEB7AARBEKDMGBIYF/
any help ?
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340513
--- Comment #3 from Till Hofmann ---
Thanks for your update.
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #2)
> Thank you for the review, Till.
>
> (In reply to Till Hofmann from comment #1)
> > - Large documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315852
--- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Hiya,
Yeah, sure. Whatever requires least effort :)
Will we need to change the package name to gstreamermm1 etc? Sorry - I'm not up
to date with what upstream's doing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140
--- Comment #21 from MartinKG ---
@Raphael Thanks for the review.
new rpm package:
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/guayadeque.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1339760
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1339760
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: js-glmatrix |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342737
--- Comment #3 from Juan Orti ---
Oh, sorry, I use this software for my backups and I just found it here alone :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
81 matches
Mail list logo