https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257
--- Comment #36 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #35)
> The fact that the check behaves differently in local mock, koji, and copr
> suggests a real problem with undefined behaviour, which I think we should
> worry ab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369535
--- Comment #3 from Aurelien Bompard ---
Ah, I found the problem, on EPEL I have to use the rubygem-minitest5 package
because the tests require at least version 5. I've updated the package:
Spec URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
--- Comment #1 from Michael Simacek ---
There have been some doubts about the licensing of the artifact, due to the
fact that in order to download it from upstream web page, it requires the user
to agree to a non-free OSGi specification licens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
Bug ID: 1381892
Summary: Review Request: osgi-core - OSGi Core API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Reporter: m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369535
Aurelien Bompard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(aurelien@bompard. |
|org)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375999
--- Comment #3 from Aurelien Bompard ---
Spec URL:
https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flufl.bounce/python-flufl-bounce.spec
SRPM URL:
https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flufl.bounce/python-flufl-bounce-2.3-1.fc23.src.rpm
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375993
--- Comment #2 from Aurelien Bompard ---
I renamed the package and used macros for the summary and description. Thanks.
Spec URL:
https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flufl.i18n/python-flufl-i18n.spec
SRPM URL:
https://abompard.fedorapeo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375962
--- Comment #4 from Julien Enselme ---
> Also, PYTHONPATH=$(pwd) can be just PYTHONPATH=., the result is the same.
Indeed, but I took the habit to use pwd to have absolute path.
Tests should pass now:
- SRPM:
http://dl.jujens.eu/SRPMS/python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984700
--- Comment #26 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner (DAASI International) from comment #25)
> Can someone please remove the alias? It's not possible to generally search
> for sddm bugs. I am not allowed to edit this bug.
please
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tim.f...@gmail.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375999
--- Comment #2 from Aurelien Bompard ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1)
> Same comments as for the other review, see
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376001#c1.
>
> Also, don't repeat the %description,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376001
--- Comment #2 from Aurelien Bompard ---
I renamed the package, and use macros for the summary and description. Thanks.
Spec URL:
https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flufl.lock/python-flufl-lock.spec
SRPM URL:
https://abompard.fedorapeo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984700
Raphael Groner (DAASI International) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||raphael.gro...@daa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
--- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchý ---
Package looks good.
My only concern is license.
License check say it that everythin is just GPL and only GPL (v2) are:
obs-build-20160809/build-pkg
obs-build-20160809/build-pkg-arch
Can you che
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259486
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(zbys...@in.waw.pl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381661
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372881
Parag Nemade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
101 - 117 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
