https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380105
--- Comment #5 from Yaakov Selkowitz ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #4)
> (In reply to Yaakov Selkowitz from comment #3)
> > Are the EXEs really useful here?
>
> If someone wants to bundle the tools with the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376934
--- Comment #2 from Tim Orling ---
Koji EPEL7 build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16643818
Koji EL6 build (fail, but not required):
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16643910
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376934
Tim Orling changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396748
Yaakov Selkowitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1397722
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396273
Tim Orling changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396273
Tim Orling changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375765
Eric Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(space...@gmail.co |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376940
Tim Orling changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396748
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395121
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Crypt-IDEA-1.10-5.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028743
--- Comment #7 from Pavel Alexeev ---
Michal thank you very much taking that.
Update to 1.0 and address most mentioned issues.
But what about password? I can't generate it in on build time, and as it in
just in options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398690
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398004
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176273
--- Comment #13 from Jeremy Newton ---
Actually, it looks like the "bear engine" (https://github.com/j-jorge/bear) is
being bundled with plee-the-bear. I'm not 100% familiar with the code, but it
looks like it should
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176273
--- Comment #12 from Jeremy Newton ---
Ok, so I've looked into it.
Looks like the maintainer for plee the bear has moved the library files to
%{_libdir}/plee-the-bear, so you'll have to add the following to cmake:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384130
Tim Orling changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384249
Tim Orling changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393796
--- Comment #4 from Gianluca Sforna ---
(In reply to Dennis Chen from comment #3)
> Ok. We can get rid of the ExclusiveArch,
the example mentions el6, but I am not sure it is limited to that. Without that
macro, we need
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391951
--- Comment #5 from Remi Collet ---
Fix for the Group:
https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/0a903e5cbb230e5bad311bd02ed8d647b89345b7
Spec:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391951
--- Comment #4 from Remi Collet ---
(In reply to François Kooman from comment #2)
> Notes in addition to the ones "inline":
>
> - gh_date in the spec file seems wrong, release 1.12.4 was released much
> more
This
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379798
--- Comment #23 from Jeremy Newton ---
Looks like it was fixed in 1.99.3, I can no longer reproduce this. I must have
missed this when I updated and tested it on RPMFusion. Thanks again for your
input!
Updated spec and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391951
--- Comment #3 from François Kooman ---
Created attachment 1224632
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1224632=edit
phpci log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391951
François Kooman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fkoo...@tuxed.net
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398858
--- Comment #1 from Mosaab Alzoubi ---
To unretirement
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/nautilus-open-terminal/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398858
Bug ID: 1398858
Summary: Review Request: nautilus-open-terminal - Nautilus
extension for an open terminal shortcut
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379798
--- Comment #22 from Jeremy Newton ---
O(In reply to Epifanov Ivan from comment #21)
> Care to share names of those games on
> https://pcsxr.codeplex.com/workitem/8567 ?
> Thing is, hard asserts allow to strictly find
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379798
--- Comment #21 from Epifanov Ivan ---
Care to share names of those games on https://pcsxr.codeplex.com/workitem/8567
?
Thing is, hard asserts allow to strictly find offending code, while removing
them can lead to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379798
--- Comment #20 from Jeremy Newton ---
(In reply to Epifanov Ivan from comment #19)
> BTW, are you sure that assert patch is (still) required?
> Removing this assert can lead to undefined behavior. The root problem of it,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379798
--- Comment #19 from Epifanov Ivan ---
BTW, are you sure that assert patch is (still) required?
Removing this assert can lead to undefined behavior. The root problem of it,
however, seems to be fixed long time ago.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365839
Julien Enselme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
30 matches
Mail list logo