https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404217
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from Remi Colle
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404577
Bug ID: 1404577
Summary: Review Request: php-fig-http-message-util - PSR Http
Message Util
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402456
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
python3-idna-2.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Te
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402456
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397842
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|ERRATA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397775
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404421
--- Comment #9 from Jason Brooks ---
(In reply to Michael Scherer from comment #6)
> Other than this, they do look ok, even if I do not have enough knowledge
> regarding the kubernetes parameters to see if the scripts are correct. I
> also won
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
--- Comment #65 from Yunying Sun ---
Thanks Dan, really appreciate the approval and sponsoring.
I've created the new package request. "fedpkg clone" currently fails with error
"Could not read from remote repository". Will try again once pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397775
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
oh I just realized I had picked this for review but did not post a review.
Doing it now. Sorry for delay.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404421
--- Comment #8 from Jason Brooks ---
(In reply to Michael Scherer from comment #5)
> Also the same for iptables and
> https://github.com/jasonbrooks/k8s-images/blob/fedpkg/proxy/Dockerfile
iptables is already pulled in by kubernetes-node, so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404421
--- Comment #7 from Jason Brooks ---
(In reply to Michael Scherer from comment #4)
> Ok so:
> - why does kubelet install utils-linux ?
>
> (
> https://github.com/jasonbrooks/k8s-images/blob/fedpkg/kubelet/Dockerfile#L11
> )
> the script do no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404465
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|git-archive-all |
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404465
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401582
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401582
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387518
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387518
--- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404489
Bug ID: 1404489
Summary: Review Request: bnfc - Convert labelled BNF grammar to
lexer/parser generator files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387518
--- Comment #4 from Aurelien Bompard ---
(BTW I reported the bug here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lazr.config/+bug/1649726)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387518
--- Comment #3 from Aurelien Bompard ---
The code does import from pkg_resources which is provided by setuptools. The
"setuptools" and "nose" are listed in the "install_requires" section in
setup.py, so it seems logical to propagate this depen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401582
--- Comment #3 from Aurelien Bompard ---
Good catch, I've removed it from the runtime requirements, thanks.
Spec URL:
https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flufl.testing/python-flufl-testing.spec
SRPM URL:
https://abompard.fedorapeople.or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391951
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417
--- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt ---
> - Sources used to build the package match the upstream source,
> as provided in the spec URL.
> Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in
> /home/jkraehemann/1403417-gsequencer/diff.txt
> See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401450
--- Comment #3 from Guido Aulisi ---
*** This is an unofficial review. ***
I checked and filled all the MUST items created by fedora-review.
I also made a successful scratch koji build,
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=168
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397089
greg.helli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404421
--- Comment #6 from Michael Scherer ---
Other than this, they do look ok, even if I do not have enough knowledge
regarding the kubernetes parameters to see if the scripts are correct. I also
wonder if the proxy image shouldn't get more documen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404465
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||git-archive-all
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404465
Bug ID: 1404465
Summary: Review Request: git-archive-all - Archive git
repository with its submodules
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404421
--- Comment #5 from Michael Scherer ---
Also the same for iptables and
https://github.com/jasonbrooks/k8s-images/blob/fedpkg/proxy/Dockerfile
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404421
--- Comment #4 from Michael Scherer ---
Ok so:
- why does kubelet install utils-linux ?
( https://github.com/jasonbrooks/k8s-images/blob/fedpkg/kubelet/Dockerfile#L11
)
the script do not seems to use it, and so, if kubelet use it,maybe the de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387518
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
Are you sure that python-setuptools and python-nose need to be runtime
requirements? I don't see anything that indicates they should be.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404421
--- Comment #3 from Jason Brooks ---
(In reply to Michael Scherer from comment #2)
> Ok, so the master seems to be good.
>
> There is the required labels, there is no extra code.
>
> I just have reservation regarding Maintainer, but that's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404421
--- Comment #2 from Michael Scherer ---
Ok, so the master seems to be good.
There is the required labels, there is no extra code.
I just have reservation regarding Maintainer, but that's not in the guideline
for now.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401582
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
Why does this package require python-setuptools? I don't see any obvious reason
for it to, based on the source code and the setup.py data...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401276
--- Comment #6 from Eric Smith ---
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/python-grako/python-grako.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/python-grako/python-grako-3.18.0-3.fc24.src.rpm
I apologize for wasting your time! Fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404421
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403030
--- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
(In reply to Jos de Kloe from comment #9)
> Here is a first attempt to review your package.
> Main issue is that I get an error when I try to load a file in hdfview.
> Also, the complaints a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404217
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Neal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404217
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[-]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required.
Note: Sourc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401967
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tcall...@redhat.com
B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398949
--- Comment #26 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
plee-the-bear-0.7.0-10 (now building in rawhide) removes all the conflicts. I
think that is sufficient for bear to proceed, though, it would be nice to be
able to use a consistent system copy of bea
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404434
Bug ID: 1404434
Summary: Container Review Request: calc - Arbitrary-precision
arithmetic system and calculator — in a container!
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387250
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404421
Bug ID: 1404421
Summary: Container Review Request: kubernetes - containers for
kubernetes master and node packages
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398949
--- Comment #25 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
(In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #24)
> Hmmm, that is problematic. I assume plee-the-bear git head also fails?
>
> For the time being you'll need to bundle it, but can you rework
> plee-the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398949
--- Comment #24 from Jeremy Newton ---
(In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #23)
> Okay, I've been poking at this today. A few comments:
>
> * You'll need to scoop up all the .tpp files as well, same logic as the .hpp
> files.
> * Th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403030
--- Comment #9 from Jos de Kloe ---
Here is a first attempt to review your package.
Main issue is that I get an error when I try to load a file in hdfview.
Also, the complaints about directory ownership should be adressed I think.
Finally, it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346038
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346038
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
python-blivet1-1.20.3-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3b1c84ea90
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398949
--- Comment #23 from Tom "spot" Callaway ---
Okay, I've been poking at this today. A few comments:
* You'll need to scoop up all the .tpp files as well, same logic as the .hpp
files.
* The version of bear that you're using is newer and incomp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398949
--- Comment #22 from Jeremy Newton ---
(In reply to MartinKG from comment #21)
> New bear Package:
> Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/bear.spec
> SRPM URL:
> https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/bear-0.7.0-0.5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176273
--- Comment #21 from Jeremy Newton ---
(In reply to MartinKG from comment #20)
> I have only uploaded the spec file due my thin internet bandwidth.
> Spec URL:
> https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/asgp-1.0.18/test2/asgp.spec
>
> there's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176273
--- Comment #20 from MartinKG ---
I have only uploaded the spec file due my thin internet bandwidth.
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/asgp-1.0.18/test2/asgp.spec
there's a problem with asgp/CMakeLists.txt see below:
+ /usr/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387518
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401582
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398949
--- Comment #21 from MartinKG ---
New bear Package:
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/bear.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/bear-0.7.0-0.5gitac6be8b.fc25.src.rpm
%changelog
* Tue Dec 13 2016
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403030
Jos de Kloe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|josdek...@gmail.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404012
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msu...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 fro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403030
--- Comment #8 from Jos de Kloe ---
thanks a lot, the build runs fine now using the fedora-review command.
Give me some time to fill the review template.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1184318 is|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404305
Bug ID: 1404305
Summary: Review Request: bcc - BPF Compiler Collection
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369720
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369708
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #64 from Dan H
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393796
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-github-go-errors-errors
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are alway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312303
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Net-LDAP-Server-Test
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1393796
Gianluca Sforna changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312303
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396406
Sascha Spreitzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396478
Sascha Spreitzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398400
--- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/superlu_dist
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404217
--- Comment #3 from Remi Collet ---
Updated to 0.0.9: https://git.io/v1P7d
Spec:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/remicollet/remirepo/3b4d7775e6ff551fbe10f618f1bc031a3076492d/php/pecl/php-pecl-dio/php-pecl-dio.spec
Srpm: http://rpms.remirepo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404217
--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet ---
Running a scratch build I discover a segfault on bigendian arch (ppc64)
Will update soon with upcoming version 0.0.9
(btw, patch tested, see
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16866221)
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404217
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404217
Bug ID: 1404217
Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-dio - Direct I/O functions
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744
Dirk Leber changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dirk.leber@avionic-design.d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398400
--- Comment #21 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #20)
> Use parallel Make if possible.
I should have added a comment that it fails.
Thanks, but I'm largely cut off from Fedora infrastructure after the flag day,
so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401276
--- Comment #5 from Iryna Shcherbina ---
(In reply to Eric Smith from comment #4)
> Your example of drawing to out.txt doesn't work; try out.pdf instead.
You are right, thank you.
> Good catch! I've added the Requires for python3-graphviz, a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404044
--- Comment #2 from bos...@gmail.com ---
The request refers to unreleased version which is a problem according to the
Apache Brooklyn community.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404044
bos...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
80 matches
Mail list logo
