https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441728
--- Comment #15 from c72...@yahoo.de ---
Thank you very much for your information on versioning of the package.
The spec file has been updated according to your suggestions:
Update cld2.spec file 0-0.7.20150821gitb56fa78
* Sun Jun 04 2017
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1452644
--- Comment #1 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/python-mmtf/python-mmtf.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449470
--- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa ---
- rpmlint issue:
* python3-coverage.src: W: invalid-license GPL
Please fix the license field so that the license tags are correct.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #45 from Devin Henderson ---
@Stephen,
FYI, it still works in Epiphany (or "Web"), the GNOME web browser. `sudo dnf
install epiphany`.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343710
--- Comment #44 from Stephen ---
I'm going to be "that guy" ;) and ask what's happening on this?
GNOME extension management on Fedora has been broken for quite a while now.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441813
Iwicki Artur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458247
Vitaly Zaitsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458247
--- Comment #4 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
Manual checks:
Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1458247
--- Comment #3 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
Automatic check results:
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1453005
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1453005
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449470
--- Comment #4 from Aurelien Bompard ---
Fixed and updated to 4.4.1, thanks.
Spec URL:
https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python3-coverage/python3-coverage.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449470
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
> BuildRequires: python3-pkgversion-macros
This package has been superseded by "python-srpm-macros" and thus doesn't build
in Rawhide anymore. Please replace.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449470
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
fedora-review failed:
> WARNING: Cannot download url:
> http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/c/coverage/coverage-4.4.tar.gz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1449470
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435876
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1458493
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435876
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
This package failed to run through fedora-review. The %check section failed:
Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.swppdB
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456244
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thanks for the review! PkgDB request is sent.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435876
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435986
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435986
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404883
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404882
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433749
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433749
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433749
--- Comment #12 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949
--- Comment #9 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to srakitnican from comment #7)
> I am actually wondering why it depends on Qt at all, I thought it is using
> it just for the build system.
Maybe.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457396
Mattias Ellert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433749
--- Comment #11 from Iwicki Artur ---
Adjusted the URL and the %find_lang usage as asked.
I've actually tried using %{prefix}, but that didn't work. Didn't think about
trying the underscored version... Fixed. Did not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404883
--- Comment #3 from Aurelien Bompard ---
Done, thanks. I've also updated the package to version 1.0 final.
Spec URL:
https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/aiosmtpd/python-aiosmtpd.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404882
--- Comment #3 from Aurelien Bompard ---
Fixed, thanks.
Spec URL:
https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/atpublic/python-atpublic.spec
SRPM URL:
32 matches
Mail list logo