https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780
--- Comment #47 from Tom Stellard ---
(In reply to Ron Olson from comment #42)
> Hope that helped clear it up; was very confusing to me at first (especially
> when the LLVM toolchain versions matched between what was installable and
> what
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780
Tom Stellard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(tstellar@redhat.c |needinfo+
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368855
--- Comment #37 from Anton Kochkov ---
That bug was fixed.
Speaking about embedded libraries.
shlw/www - can be killed, not really required for the packaging
shlr/wind - is the library used only radare2, written by radare2 developers, so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583023
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583026
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Please improve this packaging similar like we did in shobhika-fonts package
review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583026
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583023
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1583023
--- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
Looks good now.
Thanks for this package submission.
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015253
Ken Dreyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528400
Derek Thurston changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dthur...@redhat.com
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=158
--- Comment #2 from Matt Prahl ---
Thank you for the review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589633
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - I don't think %{?_isa} is needed there:
>
> Requires: boost-devel%{?_isa}
> Requires: gmp-devel%{?_isa}
> Requires:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=158
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015253
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktdre...@ktdreyer.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015253
--- Comment #16 from Ben Rosser ---
Ping; do you still want to get this into Fedora?
Please respond soon or I'll close the ticket as per
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780
Richard Shaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(tstellar@redhat.c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519785
--- Comment #13 from Ben Rosser ---
The nodejs-archiver issue was fixed last week, so notepadqq should be able to
install on Rawhide again. So you should be able to proceed. :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=158
Bug ID: 158
Summary: Review Request: fedscm-admin - CLI tool to process
Fedora SCM requests
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588913
--- Comment #8 from Dhanesh B. Sabane ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3)
> Package approved.
>
Thanks for the review! :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588909
--- Comment #10 from Dhanesh B. Sabane ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #5)
> Package approved.
Thanks for the review! :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588909
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-blindspin-2.0.1-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5268b18c29
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588909
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-blindspin-2.0.1-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-12d4335cb7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588913
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python-first-2.0.1-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-00f09b1b9e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588913
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
python-first-2.0.1-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-00f09b1b9e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588909
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588909
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python-first-2.0.1-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-00f09b1b9e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588913
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588913
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
python-first-2.0.1-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-061861daa8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588128
--- Comment #5 from Terje Røsten ---
Thanks for review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588128
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
python-httpsig-cffi-15.0.0-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2e3cd79251
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588128
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588128
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
python-httpsig-cffi-15.0.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6f21b654f0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589633
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588181
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
python3-jwt-1.6.4-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-c05e751cfd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588128
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-httpsig-cffi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585315
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585317
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
R-prettydoc-0.2.1-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589510
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
libolm-2.2.2-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588063
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589494
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589386
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
elementary-shortcut-overlay-1.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588210
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585616
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
php-phpunitgoodpractices-polyfill-1.1.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589066
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
wingpanel-indicator-nightlight-2.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588260
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589330
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
switchboard-plug-sound-0.1-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585621
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
php-cs-fixer-phpunit-constraint-isidenticalstring-1.0.1-1.fc28 has been pushed
to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make
note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585622
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
php-cs-fixer-phpunit-constraint-xmlmatchesxsd-1.0.1-1.fc28 has been pushed to
the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note
of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589746
--- Comment #2 from Stephan Bergmann ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585317
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416705
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #10 from Tom
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269986
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tcall...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586295
--- Comment #18 from Jun Aruga ---
> But the risk is rather low IMO, therefore I think it would be nice to raise
> this concern upstream, have link to the upstream issue somewhere in the .spec
> file and move on.
Ah coincidence. Below is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586295
--- Comment #17 from Jun Aruga ---
Hi Pavel,
I do not order you anything.
I just reviewed your code following the review process.
And I was not sure the rpmlint's result of ERROR was affordable or not.
And if I was not confident for that, I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589510
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780
--- Comment #44 from Ron Olson ---
Did the session log help? The clang that Swift builds is just for building
Swift, and then uses the installed clang for building Swift-based binaries.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589330
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585622
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589386
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588074
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589066
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585616
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585621
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585385
--- Comment #9 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Mamoru TASAKA from comment #7)
> Also I also checked the dependency and currently no package depends on
> rubygem-progressbar, so I am also for retiring rubygem-progressbar on F-29+ .
Then
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586295
--- Comment #16 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Pavel Valena from comment #12)
> (In reply to Jun Aruga from comment #10)
> > How about using mkstemp instead of mktemp? Though I am not confident for
> > that? or asking security guys?
> >
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589746
Stephan Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sberg...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589746
--- Comment #1 from Caolan McNamara ---
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~caolanm/rpms/libnumbertext.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.redhat.com/~caolanm/rpms/libnumbertext-1.0.2-2.fc28.src.rpm
with extra clarification of license of some data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586295
--- Comment #15 from Pavel Valena ---
(In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #14)
> (In reply to Pavel Valena from comment #7)
> > > I am fine to skip the test failure this time for armv7hl.
> >
> > I'll file a bug when the component is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589510
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589510
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
libolm-2.2.2-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7a751f191f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589510
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
libolm-2.2.2-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-bb609d6694
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372926
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268758
Bug 1268758 depends on bug 1372926, which changed state.
Bug 1372926 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby-progressbar -
Ruby/ProgressBar is a flexible text progress bar library for Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372926
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268758
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1585385
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585385
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1268758
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585385
--- Comment #7 from Mamoru TASAKA ---
Well, I thought that current rubygem-ruby-progressbar needs much dependency,
but after looking the gem carefully they are all "development" dependency, not
"runtime" dependency...
Well, actually
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586295
--- Comment #14 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Pavel Valena from comment #7)
> > I am fine to skip the test failure this time for armv7hl.
>
> I'll file a bug when the component is created.
> In the meantime I'll exclude the armv7hl arch,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586295
--- Comment #13 from Pavel Valena ---
Note: `bootsnap/setup` gets called only once, on the 'boot' in Rails.
https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/5-2-stable/railties/lib/rails/generators/rails/app/templates/config/boot.rb.tt
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586295
--- Comment #12 from Pavel Valena ---
(In reply to Jun Aruga from comment #10)
> How about using mkstemp instead of mktemp? Though I am not confident for
> that? or asking security guys?
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586295
--- Comment #11 from Jun Aruga ---
> I'll file a bug when the component is created.
> In the meantime I'll exclude the armv7hl arch, as it does not work at all.
Okay. It is good to file the bug as Bugzilla.
> ExcludeArch: armv7hl
Okay,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586295
--- Comment #10 from Jun Aruga ---
How about using mkstemp instead of mktemp? Though I am not confident for that?
or asking security guys?
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Insecure_Temporary_File
> Finally, mkstemp() is a reasonably safe way
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589746
Bug ID: 1589746
Summary: Review Request: libnumbertext - Language-neutral
NUMBERTEXT and MONEYTEXT functions for LibreOffice
Calc
Product: Fedora
Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586295
--- Comment #9 from Jun Aruga ---
Ref: How to attack is written here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_of_check_to_time_of_use
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586295
--- Comment #8 from Jun Aruga ---
> I do not think wee need to do anything with the `call-to-mktemp` - see below.
>
> Reading the code:
> * On C level [1] - expects atomic access to a file (used for caching only,
> reasonable hashing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589283
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589386
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
elementary-shortcut-overlay-1.0-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-b6698f7a3b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589386
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
elementary-shortcut-overlay-1.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6dc7b9ce07
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589386
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589330
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
switchboard-plug-sound-0.1-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9e946d9ac9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589330
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589330
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
switchboard-plug-sound-0.1-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f0f2f8ecf2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281532
Pavel Raiskup changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589066
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
wingpanel-indicator-nightlight-2.0-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5decf64a99
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589066
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589066
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
wingpanel-indicator-nightlight-2.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f19150edba
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588210
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-pebbe-zmq4-0-0.2.20180610git5b443b6.fc28 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-32d4720174
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588210
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588074
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588074
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
elementary-camera-1.0-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-cc39e0a2a9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588063
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
elementary-calendar-0.4.2-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-369f59ee88
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
