https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684719
Didier Fabert (tartare) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684719
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
netdata-1.12.2-3.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-73f56470be
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684719
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
netdata-1.12.2-3.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f6e7515c5e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684719
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
netdata-1.12.2-3.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-1f1ea9b9eb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684719
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
netdata-1.12.2-3.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-71271c98ac
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684719
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684862
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
python-dask-1.1.4-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686244
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
R-maps-3.3.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663348
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665563
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #22 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685102
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python-pycxx-7.1.2-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557371
--- Comment #55 from Fedora Update System ---
java-openjdk-12.0.0.33-1.ea.1.rolling.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685102
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670656
Nathan Scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1690185
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690185
Nathan Scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mgood...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690185
Bug ID: 1690185
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-macaron - Productive and
modular web framework in Go
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670656
Nathan Scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1690178
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690178
Nathan Scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mgood...@redhat.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690178
Bug ID: 1690178
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-inconshreveable-log15 -
Simple toolkit for best-practice logging in Go
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687178
--- Comment #25 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Chris Caron from comment #24)
> > - You could use sed instead of a patch to remove the shebang, it's a bbit
> > overkill for one line.
>
> This will go away in the next version as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687178
--- Comment #24 from Chris Caron ---
> - You could use sed instead of a patch to remove the shebang, it's a bbit
> overkill for one line.
This will go away in the next version as it's fixed upstream anyway.
> - %{__install} → install
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670656
Bug 1670656 depends on bug 1689600, which changed state.
Bug 1689600 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-codahale-hdrhistogram - Go
implementation of the High Dynamic Range (HDR) Histogram
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689600
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689600
Nathan Scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689599
Nathan Scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670656
Bug 1670656 depends on bug 1689599, which changed state.
Bug 1689599 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-xorm-builder - Lightweight
and fast SQL builder for Go and XORM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689599
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377229
Bug 1377229 depends on bug 1689595, which changed state.
Bug 1689595 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-stack - Capture, manipulate
and format Go call stacks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689595
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689595
Nathan Scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670656
Bug 1670656 depends on bug 1689595, which changed state.
Bug 1689595 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-stack - Capture, manipulate
and format Go call stacks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689595
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #15 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
This takes forever to compile.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670656
Bug 1670656 depends on bug 1689081, which changed state.
Bug 1689081 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-xorm-core - Lightweight Go
sql.DB wrapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689081
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689081
Nathan Scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689638
Nathan Scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670656
Bug 1670656 depends on bug 1689638, which changed state.
Bug 1689638 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-unknwon-com - Commonly used
functions for the Go programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689638
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544239
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(dper...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689493
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689488
Nathan Scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670656
Bug 1670656 depends on bug 1689488, which changed state.
Bug 1689488 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-xorm - Xorm is a simple and
powerful ORM for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689488
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689489
Nathan Scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670656
Bug 1670656 depends on bug 1689489, which changed state.
Bug 1689489 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-oklog-run - Universal
mechanism to manage goroutine lifecycles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689489
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415612
--- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
No update here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545479
--- Comment #14 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
%if 0%{?__isa_bits} == 64
%global build_libdir lib64/
%else
%global build_libdir lib/
%endif
- Why not use %{_lib}? It resolves to either lib or lib64 depending on the
arch.
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689493
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1689483
--- Comment #6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689483
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1689493
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687178
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674278
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1607079
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535549
--- Comment #14 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Wade Berrier from comment #13)
> I guess I need a sponsor?
>
> My pagure.io requests were closed.
Yes you need a sponsor:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638824
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689486
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562526
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Blocks|177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689486
--- Comment #3 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Fixed. No need for double-building; %check is run after %install.
Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/python-numcodecs.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685200
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689483
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-sphinx-issues
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689542
--- Comment #10 from Fabio Valentini ---
Okay, thanks!
dist-git requests:
rawhide: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10526
f30: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10527
f29:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663668
--- Comment #3 from Hirotaka Wakabayashi ---
Hello, Robert and Zbigniew
I am very sorry for my late reply. I will update the stuff soon.
Thanks in advance,
Hirotaka Wakabayashi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689164
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-geomet
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688565
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-ggplot2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690050
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688565
--- Comment #3 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2)
> Thanks for doing plenty of review for me!
Ah, I'm sure you've done way more reviews for me so far!
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690046
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
---
Checking: spausedd-20190318-2.fc31.x86_64.rp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689542
--- Comment #9 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
It's a check for this:
Each Ruby package MUST indicate it depends on a Ruby interpreter (this does not
apply to RubyGems). Use ruby(release) virtual requirement to achieve that:
Requires:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690051
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@scrye.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689542
--- Comment #8 from Fabio Valentini ---
Thanks for the review!
What's the issue "Package contains Requires: ruby(release)." about?
That's only in the BuildRequires, where it was automatically added by gem2rpm.
It's not present in the built
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690046
Dave Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dave.l...@manchester.ac.uk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689542
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689542
--- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini ---
- Regenerated the parser from the grammar
- Included and enabled the test suite
- Removed the grammar file from the installed files
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663668
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689865
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689523
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689397
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689542
--- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini ---
> That is nothing exceptional. Guidelines mention this situation.
Right. I'll work on it.
I'll have the next version ready later today or tomorrow.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684612
--- Comment #21 from Adam Williamson ---
Source1 in this package - metadata.desktop , which is the KDE desktop
configuration - was copied from the F29 package and not updated, it's stuffed
with F29s:
[Desktop Entry]
Name=Fedora Twenty Nine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665541
--- Comment #8 from Luis Bazan ---
The BR its ready in rawhide.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-7cfad91e80
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6564f9694c
Cheers,
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665563
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
python-rangehttpserver-1.2.0-9.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6564f9694c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689494
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665563
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #20 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689654
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-MooX-Role-Parameterized
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689493
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688555
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-capturer
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688563
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-verboselogs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689493
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Ha you need to BR msgpack first:
BuildRequires: python3dist(msgpack)
- But now the tests segfaults later:
BUILDSTDERR: Ran 1303 tests in 30.335s
BUILDSTDERR: OK
BUILDSTDERR:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689486
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Ok I think you should fix the SPEC like this with an additionnal build command:
%build
CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}}" LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS:-${RPM_LD_FLAGS}}"
%{__python3} %{py_setup}
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684934
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
golang-github-roaringbitmap-roaring-0.4.17-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora
29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989
--- Comment #19 from Petr Menšík ---
Almost there. License tag is wrong, most headers have GPLv2 or later, while
some files have no license tags. Since there is conflict between main license
file and file headers, both must be declared in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663633
--- Comment #5 from Markku Korkeala ---
No worries, thank you for the review :)
I'll continue searching for a sponsor.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689493
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Source0:
https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/z/%{srcname}/%{srcname}-%{version}.tar.gz
→
Source0:%{pypi_source}
+ PYTHONPATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/zarr-2.2.0
+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689486
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689493
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153
--- Comment #54 from J. Scheurich ---
> Recommends would work just fine.
> But I proposed that as generic pattern. I am sure Fedora has more terminals
> and more bitmap editors available. It could reuse similar approach. But that
> would be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689493
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690051
Bug ID: 1690051
Summary: @design-suite group contains conflicting packages
Product: Fedora
Version: 29
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153
--- Comment #53 from J. Scheurich ---
> It might be nice to have already compiled examples from code provided
> however. For example in examples subpackage. If they are small and do not
> have additional dependencies, they might be part of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690050
Bug ID: 1690050
Summary: Review Request: cutter-re - GUI for radare2 reverse
engineering framework
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689251
Till Hofmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690046
jo...@lanl.gov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690046
jo...@lanl.gov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: -|container runtime
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690046
Bug ID: 1690046
Summary: Review Request: -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153
--- Comment #52 from Petr Menšík ---
Thank you for pkg-config usage. It uses less flags but they are more accurate.
1)
Since doc subpackage does not contain license, it must depend on the same
version of main package. No package can be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689483
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo