https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1723052
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1723045
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
zola-rolling-2920190624203701.c5ebb199 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 Modular
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716196
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
msoffcrypto-tool-4.10.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650621
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
fpart-1.1.0-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720757
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685200
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716196
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650621
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
fpart-1.1.0-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1723045
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720049
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650621
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
fpart-1.1.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650621
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1713851
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
zimg-2.8-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693514
--- Comment #4 from Jerry James ---
Due to my sloth, the repos were not created within 60 days. For purposes of
re-review, here are the latest URLs:
Spec URL:
https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/coin-or-Data-Netlib/coin-or-Data-Netlib.spec
SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693513
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
Due to my sloth, the repos were not created within 60 days. For purposes of
re-review, here are the latest URLs:
Spec URL:
https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/gap-pkg-jupyterviz/gap-pkg-jupyterviz.spec
SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693512
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
Due to my sloth, the repos were not created within 60 days. For purposes of
re-review, here are the latest URLs:
Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/gap-pkg-francy/gap-pkg-francy.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1723997
Bug ID: 1723997
Summary: Review Request: gap-pkg-happrime - HAP extension for
small prime power groups
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1668010
--- Comment #17 from Tom Stellard ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/tstellar/rocm-2.0/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00944691-hip/hip.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1709481
--- Comment #10 from Ondrej Soukup ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #9)
> LGTM, package approved.
Thank you for the detailed review and lot of advice!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720049
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-fd647ad5dc has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-fd647ad5dc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1720049
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703381
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
>> - 20180720: should be the date you *took* the snapshot, not the date of the
>> commit
>
>Why? It doesn't make much sense to me and the guidelines don't seem to suggest
>anything like that:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1709481
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716886
--- Comment #3 from Andrea ---
just few errors from rpmlint
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incoherent-logrotate-file
for:
nordugrid-arc6-arex.x86_64: E: incoherent-logrotate-file
/etc/logrotate.d/nordugrid-arc-arex
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416705
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: python-kivy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494914
--- Comment #8 from George Nikandrov ---
Any news on this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1702720
--- Comment #8 from Michal Ruprich ---
Sorry I forgot to add a link to the new build:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mruprich/frr/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00944463-frr/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1702720
--- Comment #7 from Michal Ruprich ---
Hi Martin,
I created a new build with the newer upstream version 7.1 and included
suggestions from David. Could you take a look at this? I ran it through the
review-tool and so far it seems good. The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1668010
--- Comment #16 from Felix Schwarz ---
> I decided to add back the static library in its own sub-package. I don't
> want to remove the -use-staticlib option, because it seems like it might
> cause us problems in the future if fedora is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703382
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703386
Bug 1703386 depends on bug 1703382, which changed state.
Bug 1703382 Summary: Review Request: libetnaviv - Vivante GPU user-space driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703382
What|Removed |Added
31 matches
Mail list logo