https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672978
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572826
Thomas Moschny changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(rel...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771769
--- Comment #3 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
Rename selenium-geckodriver to simply geckodriver like the upstream.
Get the source package like
Source0: %{url}/archive/%{version}/geckodriver-%{version}.tar.gz
where URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771769
Luya Tshimbalanga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771769
Luya Tshimbalanga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luya_...@thefinalzone.net
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765729
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733023
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #17 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1723052
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689277
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
make-it-quick-0.2.5-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209809
benja...@bgroberts.id.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(Benjamin@BGRobert |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1767752
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765729
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gap-pkg-format
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150441
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #14 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765729
--- Comment #3 from Jerry James ---
Thank you, Ankur! I will let upstream know about the license.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700438
--- Comment #4 from bnda...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Dusty Mabe from comment #2)
> hey bndabbs you closed this. Do you still want it in fedora? I'd like to
> have it in Fedora too.
It would be great to have it in Fedora. I just didn't have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700438
bnda...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(bnda...@gmail.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1700438
Dusty Mabe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dustym...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956
--- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for your comment.
* Thu Nov 19 2019 Fabian Affolter - 0.7.2-4
- Fix license tag (rhbz#1748956)
Update files:
Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-dateparser.spec
SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772578
Boris Ranto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772623
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772684
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772637
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748530
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774194
Tom Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774194
--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes ---
This package built on koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39105170
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774194
Bug ID: 1774194
Summary: Review Request: nodejs-pg-numeric - A reader for the
PostgreSQL binary format for numeric values, producing
a string
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770961
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733023
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #16 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772578
--- Comment #3 from Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) ---
Whoops, that fedora-review command should include the flag for EPEL 8. Here's
the correct command to run: "fedora-review -b 1772578 -m epel-8-x86_64"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772578
--- Comment #2 from Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) ---
Here are the current package review guidelines:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/
Here is an easy way to start reviewing this package: "fedora-review -b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772387
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Package Review |Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772387
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772387
--- Comment #2 from Germano Massullo ---
EPEL-7 fedora-review form filled
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773884
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ---
The Koji build task fails with "BuildError: package perl-Object-HashBase not in
list for tag f32-updates-candidate" even after an hour. It seems Koji white
list was not properly updated.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752139
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752139
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519834
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519834
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773884
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774098
Vlad Temian changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769843
--- Comment #18 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/low-memory-monitor
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773884
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Object-HashBase
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774098
Bug ID: 1774098
Summary: Review Request: gitfs - 0.5.2
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1765591
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/oval-graph
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769073
--- Comment #3 from Artem ---
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/rust-crates/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01112857-rust-i3ipc/rust-i3ipc.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1766842
--- Comment #2 from Jeremy Newton ---
(In reply to Ondřej Pohořelský from comment #1)
> Hi, this is my first informal review and I would be glad to hear any
> feedback on it.
Thanks for the review!
>
> I would suggest getting in touch with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769323
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review-
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772664
Ondřej Pohořelský changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||opoho...@redhat.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769323
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769323
--- Comment #6 from Steve Traylen ---
Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python3-dateutil/python3-dateutil.spec
SRPM URL:
http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python3-dateutil/python3-dateutil-2.8.1-1.el7.src.rpm
Update 2.8.1 - no other
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771750
--- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa ---
> Requires: %{orig_name}% = %{version}
> Requires: %{orig_name}% >= %{version}-%{release}
You probably don't want to specifically do "Requires: %orig_name >=
%version-%release" there, as it's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1771750
--- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa ---
This spec seems fine, but I can't run it through fedora-review because you're
linking to html pages. Can you please provide direct links?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(ngomp...@gmail.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764813
--- Comment #9 from Neal Gompa ---
Err, I mean I don't want apt configured with Debian repos out of the gate.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764813
--- Comment #8 from Neal Gompa ---
(In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #7)
> - warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/doc/apt
>
> - you preferred
> touch %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/apt/sources.list
> instead
> install -m644
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956
--- Comment #11 from Jared Smith ---
Package Review
==
* License for the code is BSD (3-clause), but the spec file states MIT
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1766842
opoho...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||opoho...@redhat.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769323
--- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen ---
Update .spec and pacakge.
Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python3-dateutil/python3-dateutil.spec
SRPM URL:
http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/python3-dateutil/python3-dateutil-2.8.0-3.el7.src.rpm
Diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773924
Bug ID: 1773924
Summary: Review Request: xdp-tools - Utilities and example
programs for use with XDP
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773884
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773382
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pbrobin...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773884
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773884
Bug ID: 1773884
Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-HashBase - Build
hash-based classes
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
64 matches
Mail list logo