https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824016
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alebast...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823265
--- Comment #3 from Aleksei Bavshin ---
(In reply to Bob Hepple from comment #2)
>
> Question: once neatvnc is approved it will take some time to be available in
> koji - maybe a week or more. During that time, is there any way we can
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823265
--- Comment #2 from Bob Hepple ---
Thanks Aleksei,
Here's the separated neatvnc RR:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824016
New build of wayvnc based on that:
SPEC URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824016
Bug ID: 1824016
Summary: Review Request: neatvnc - a liberally licensed VNC
server library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746587
Hirotaka Wakabayashi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805928
--- Comment #15 from Artem ---
No prob at all. :) I almost always try to build first without LTO and then with
LTO and trying to see at least any difference in footprint since not always
possible to do some benchmarks. And TBH this is not the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805928
--- Comment #14 from Fabio Valentini ---
(In reply to Artem from comment #13)
> Seems like we have some misunderstanding there, but that's obviously since
> you asking meta questions. So what's exactly a problem here? You still
> didn't said.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814682
--- Comment #46 from l...@mellanox.com ---
Thanks for help the debugging!
Below is updated version trying to solve these issues.
Spec URL:
https://github.com/Mellanox/rshim-user-space/releases/download/rshim-2.0.3/rshim.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822971
David Cantrell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773720
Ryan O'Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802370
Olivier Lemasle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(o.lemasle@gmail.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822971
David Cantrell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773720
--- Comment #14 from Brandon Perkins ---
$ rpm -qp --requires
golang-github-haproxytech-dataplaneapi-1.2.4-7.fc33.x86_64.rpm | grep ^haproxy
haproxy >= 2.0
$ rpm -qp --requires
golang-github-haproxytech-dataplaneapi-1.2.4-7.fc33.x86_64.rpm |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802362
Olivier Lemasle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773720
--- Comment #13 from Brandon Perkins ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bdperkin/haproxytech/master/SPECS/golang-github-haproxytech-dataplaneapi.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773719
--- Comment #11 from Brandon Perkins ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bdperkin/haproxytech/master/SPECS/golang-github-haproxytech-client-native.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1805928
--- Comment #13 from Artem ---
> Uh ... that's my point, it's *not* an elementary project.
Seems like we have some misunderstanding there, but that's obviously since you
asking meta questions. So what's exactly a problem here? You still
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773720
--- Comment #12 from Brandon Perkins ---
(In reply to Ryan O'Hara from comment #11)
> (In reply to Brandon Perkins from comment #10)
> > (In reply to Ryan O'Hara from comment #9)
> >
> > The /etc/logrotate.d directory is owned by the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #16 from yon...@cisco.com ---
Regarding that OpenOSC-1.0.1 vs. openosc-1.0.1 issue, I prefer to always use
lower-case openosc, to avoid any such upper-case vs. lower-case issue.
When I download the tarball file, it is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #15 from yon...@cisco.com ---
Spec file updated:
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/yonhan/openosc/fedora-31-x86_64/01337903-openosc/openosc.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803309
Joe Doss changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(j...@solidadmin.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823265
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alebast...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815725
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803312
Joe Doss changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(j...@solidadmin.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803312
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803309
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822971
--- Comment #8 from Nick Black ---
Sorry, ugh, raw spec is here:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dankamongmen/notcurses/master/tools/notcurses.spec
(previous was marked up)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823860
Bug ID: 1823860
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-henvic-httpretty -
Prints the HTTP requests you make with Go pretty on
your terminal
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773720
--- Comment #11 from Ryan O'Hara ---
(In reply to Brandon Perkins from comment #10)
> (In reply to Ryan O'Hara from comment #9)
> >
> > [ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
> >
> > - The license is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814682
--- Comment #45 from Alaa Hleihel (Mellanox) ---
Update: We found the issue, the device was not enabled, so we couldn't read
from it...
[root@qualcomm-amberwing-rep2-01 pcie_read_test]# lspci - -d :c2d2
:01:00.2 DMA controller:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812961
--- Comment #14 from yon...@cisco.com ---
Hi Robert,
Thanks for the comments!
Yes, I did try using "%autosetup -n OpenOSC-%{version}" in the openosc.spec
file, which however caused the below build error:
+ cd OpenOSC-1.0.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823724
Stephen Gallagher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sgall...@redhat.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820846
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-nbutton23-zxcvbn
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820852
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-antchfx-xpath
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823724
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhron...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820846
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823319
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823319
--- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa ---
Review notes:
* Package is named per Python package naming guidelines
* Package builds and installs properly
* Package generally follows Fedora packaging guidelines
* Package follows Python packaging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815725
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823117
--- Comment #11 from Artur Iwicki ---
Yeah, they probably should. I never packaged fonts before, and the Font
Packaging Guidelines are quite long - plus the upstream website for the font is
in Korean, which I don't speak - so I went the lazy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823724
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823724
Bug ID: 1823724
Summary: Rename Review Request: yarnpkg - Fast, reliable, and
secure dependency management
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823117
--- Comment #10 from Antonio T. (sagitter) ---
I guess that the font files
--
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/opensurge-0.5.1.2-4.fc31.x86_64/usr/share/opensurge/fonts/GothicA1-Medium.ttf
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820845
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||germano.massu...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773382
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1818602
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822971
--- Comment #7 from Nick Black ---
@artur, are you my official reviewer? If so, could you PTAL (and update the
fedora-review flag)? thanks muchly!
SRPM: https://www.dsscaw.com/repos/dnf/notcurses-1.3.0-1.fc32.src.rpm
Spec:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1725924
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820852
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from
48 matches
Mail list logo
