https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825681
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ef8ddb60a9 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825183
--- Comment #5 from Parag Nemade ---
Thank you, I understood this font family packaging now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825681
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-d8c9d1d028 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827887
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-3c66ece950 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827948
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-14db45aad6 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820478
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-3e6c4cf61e has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-120aea1636 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827901
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-75d218e536 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827887
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-d752e3b411 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825681
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-94b86b8f5b has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827887
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820478
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-d716db29e2 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #23 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825681
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #15 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827948
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827901
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826034
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826998
--- Comment #8 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Now that jsonrpc-server is done, I believe we can move forward with this.
If I enable the tests, the package building process, appears to get stuck.
Please see these scratch builds.
rawhide -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775443
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alebast...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827427
--- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
repo requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/24619
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827427
--- Comment #7 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
(In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #4)
> Looks pretty good. I believe the spelling of "dropdown" should be
> "drop-down" as rpmlint suggests, but not a blocker.
>
Thanks. I normally just
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773717
--- Comment #9 from Brandon Perkins ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bdperkin/haproxytech/master/SPECS/golang-github-haproxytech-models.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773719
--- Comment #12 from Brandon Perkins ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bdperkin/haproxytech/master/SPECS/golang-github-haproxytech-client-native.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773720
--- Comment #15 from Brandon Perkins ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bdperkin/haproxytech/master/SPECS/golang-github-haproxytech-dataplaneapi.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773718
--- Comment #8 from Brandon Perkins ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bdperkin/haproxytech/master/SPECS/golang-github-haproxytech-config-parser.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816301
--- Comment #15 from mark.ole...@esi-group.com ---
A quick question for understanding packaging:
If I now package under /usr/lib/openfoam/PKG instead of tossing things into
/opt/PKG, rpmlint complains if I do not include /usr/lib/openfoam in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775443
--- Comment #14 from Morian Sonnet ---
Thanks for reviewing!
Seems like FAS calls to_lowercase on the email address and Bugzilla allows only
to change the email once. FAS and Bugzilla emails should be equal now,
different from before though.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828565
Artem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828565
Bug ID: 1828565
Summary: Review Request: lcms - Color Management System
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822971
Nick Black changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(d...@qemfd.net) |
--- Comment #34 from Nick Black ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827784
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775443
--- Comment #13 from Till Hofmann ---
As I still need to sponsor you, I realized that your emails in FAS and on
Bugzilla do not match exactly; one uses camel case, the other one all lower
case. Not sure if this matters, but can you change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775443
Till Hofmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825183
--- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot ---
Hi Parag
spec cleanliness aside (and I don’t pretend to be a CJK expert) I think Akira
is right, we’re not in presence of two font families, but a single one, split
over two files to workaround the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827427
Jeremy Newton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|alexjn...@fastmail.com
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827427
Jeremy Newton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from Jeremy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378416
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378417
Bug 1378417 depends on bug 1378416, which changed state.
Bug 1378416 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-postcss - Transforming styles with
JS plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378416
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #21 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826950
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #21 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827887
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-3c66ece950 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-3c66ece950
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827887
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827887
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-d80df47a6f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d80df47a6f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825681
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775443
--- Comment #11 from Morian Sonnet ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/momosomium/wlr-randr/fedora-32-x86_64/01352304-wlr-randr/wlr-randr.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825681
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-d8c9d1d028 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d8c9d1d028
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825681
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ef8ddb60a9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ef8ddb60a9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825681
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-d8c9d1d028 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d8c9d1d028
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268744
Bug 1268744 depends on bug 1268742, which changed state.
Bug 1268742 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-bacon-colored_output - Colored
output for Bacon test framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
What
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268758
Bug 1268758 depends on bug 1268703, which changed state.
Bug 1268703 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-powerpack - A few useful
extensions to core Ruby classes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268703
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268703
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827784
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-jsonrpc-server
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433795
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814349
--- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/google-caladea-fonts
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914790
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1405111
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232816
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378416
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828205
David Cantrell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(d...@qemfd.net)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827948
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-f7314234a8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f7314234a8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827948
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828205
--- Comment #1 from David Cantrell ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822971
David Cantrell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(d...@qemfd.net)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827948
--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-spyking-circus
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825681
--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/create-fake-rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827887
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-biblesync
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822971
--- Comment #32 from David Cantrell ---
For completeness, comments on the manual items:
(In reply to David Cantrell from comment #31)
> [ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
It does not.
> [ ]: Package contains no static
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156
--- Comment #15 from Eric Sandeen ---
I have no strong preferences or opinions re:
conflicts/provides/obsoletes/whatever, that's not my strong point at all. So
please don't take anything I said there as an imperative.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822971
David Cantrell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|BuildFails |
--- Comment #31 from David
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828205
David Cantrell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827343
Andreas Gerstmayr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825183
Parag Nemade changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pnem...@redhat.com
--- Comment #3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775443
Till Hofmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775443
--- Comment #10 from Till Hofmann ---
It looks like you reset the Release to `Release: 1.`? You shouldn't do that,
because its version is then lower than the previous version, e.g., 0-1.20200408
< 0-2.20200301.
rpmdev-vercmp is a handy tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775443
--- Comment #9 from Till Hofmann ---
No worries, no time wasted :)
> Requires: pkgconfig(wayland-client)
> Requires: pkgconfig(wlroots)
This is most probably wrong, a package should not require devel packages.
Note that the dependency on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775443
--- Comment #8 from Morian Sonnet ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/momosomium/wlr-randr/fedora-31-x86_64/01351788-wlr-randr/wlr-randr.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828205
Nick Black changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Red Hat Bugzilla 177841
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828205
Bug ID: 1828205
Summary: Review Request: doctest - fast header-only C++ unit
testing
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156
--- Comment #14 from Simone Caronni ---
(In reply to Eric Sandeen from comment #12)
> btw exfat-utils has now been renamed exfatprogs as of v1.0.2:
>
> ===
> This is the second release of exfatprogs since the initial version(1.0.1).
> We
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156
--- Comment #13 from Simone Caronni ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #10)
> > URL:https://github.com/exfat-utils/exfat-utils
>
> The URL should be "https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs;
Good point :D
> > Source0:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816733
--- Comment #4 from Marc-Andre Lureau ---
ping Igor?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827901
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827901
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827948
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825291
Nikola Forró changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775443
Till Hofmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(thofmann@fedorapr |
|oject.org)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795360
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-6c81119e4a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827948
--- Comment #7 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
For the sake of completeness I'll say: fedora-review still claims it can't
install, but testing from a rawhide container the RPM installs just fine.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827887
--- Comment #4 from greg.helli...@gmail.com ---
>- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
> in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
> for the package is included in %license.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795360
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e4f3a45115 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827948
greg.helli...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795360
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-650b6557cd has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
95 matches
Mail list logo