https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839476
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-d2173c8004 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839475
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-d2173c8004 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839476
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839475
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833511
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-dustinkirkland-petname
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839429
--- Comment #1 from Breno ---
Hi Michel,
Do you think we could have the text file of the licenses?
E.g. %license LICENSE-APACHE LICENSE-MIT [1, 2]
What about having the latest version?
I see here the bzip2-sys-0.1.9 was released only ~ 5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773720
--- Comment #22 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-haproxytech-dataplaneapi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773719
--- Comment #15 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-haproxytech-client-native
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842662
Antonio T. sagitter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842662
Bug ID: 1842662
Summary: Review Request: ismrmrd - ISMRM Raw Data Format
(ISMRMRD)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833511
Brandon Perkins changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833511
Ryan O'Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833511
--- Comment #4 from Ryan O'Hara ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833511
Ryan O'Hara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|roh...@redhat.com
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840870
Ondřej Míchal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839476
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-26f856d019 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-26f856d019
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839476
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839475
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-26f856d019 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-26f856d019
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839475
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1443767
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jsmith.fedora@gma |
|il.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842042
--- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchý ---
repo2module.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US yaml -> yam, yams,
yawl
This should be YAML
repo2module.x86_64: E: no-binary
Hmm. no idea what this means :( I am going to ignore this.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840914
Erich Eickmeyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840914
Erich Eickmeyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--- Comment #8 from Erich
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840914
Erich Eickmeyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840914
Erich Eickmeyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|er...@ericheickmeyer.com
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840870
Ondřej Míchal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|unspecified |medium
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842579
Bug ID: 1842579
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-acobaugh-osrelease -
Golang package to read and parse /etc/os-release
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840914
--- Comment #7 from Jerry James ---
Erich, you should have reviewer privileges now. If you feel comfortable acting
in the role of reviewer for this bug, then please proceed. If you don't,
please let me know and I will get somebody else to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836568
--- Comment #2 from Javier Peña ---
I'll take a more in-depth look one graphql-core is built.
From the spec file, I'd only modify the "Requires:
python3dist(graphql-core) >= 3~a0" line. While that matches the requirement in
the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836568
Javier Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836567
--- Comment #2 from Javier Peña ---
Hi,
The spec looks good, I just have a couple suggestions for fixes:
- The documentation build from your source rpm shows a lot of errors due to the
graphql package not being available. I had some success
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839476
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-msal-extensions
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836567
Javier Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547500
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||reif...@gmail.com
--- Comment #14
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674625
Matt Prahl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |VERIFIED
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773720
--- Comment #21 from Brandon Perkins ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bdperkin/haproxytech/master/SPECS/golang-github-haproxytech-dataplaneapi.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839476
--- Comment #2 from Mohamed El Morabity ---
Thanks again for this review Fabian :)
(In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #1)
> Installation issue can be ignored as the package is in Rawhide. Package
> APPROVED.
I've just launched a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842475
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842475
Bug ID: 1842475
Summary: Review Request: python-publicsuffix2 - Get a public
suffix for a domain name using the Public Suffix List
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842042
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(msu...@redhat.com |fedora-review?
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839476
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827939
Guido Aulisi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832562
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugs.mich...@gmx.net
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842328
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795526
--- Comment #14 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
These two should be fixed:
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners:
/usr/share/doc/ghc/html/libraries, /usr/share/doc/ghc/html,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840134
Yaroslav Sidlovsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
46 matches
Mail list logo