https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821346
Hirotaka Wakabayashi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821417
Hirotaka Wakabayashi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839978
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839978
--- Comment #5 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Created attachment 1695763
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1695763=edit
fedora-review.txt
Generated by fedora-review 0.7.5 (5fa5b7e) last change: 2020-02-16
Command line
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839978
--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Created attachment 1695762
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1695762=edit
phpcompatinfo-src.log
phpCompatInfo version 5.2.3 DB version 2.14.0 built May 18 2020 09:40:40 CEST
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839978
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839978
--- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski ---
Created attachment 1695761
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1695761=edit
phpcompatinfo-full.log
phpCompatInfo version 5.2.3 DB version 2.14.0 built May 18 2020 09:40:40 CEST
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844225
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830458
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833471
--- Comment #4 from Jerry James ---
Let's try those URLs again:
Spec URL:
https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/ocaml-variantslib/ocaml-variantslib.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830539
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809469
Itamar Reis Peixoto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844696
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844696
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: Pytest |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830712
--- Comment #13 from Kevin Kofler ---
> Well, I thought you intent me to do so.
That was my intention, actually. I was just surprised that you have not posted
fedora-review output yet.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788327
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|unspecified |medium
Severity|unspecified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1787970
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825456
--- Comment #8 from lnie ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #5)
> What about:
>
>
>
> %if %{with_python3}
> %global __python %{__python3}
> %else
> %global __python %{__python2}
> %endif
>
> ...
>
> %check
> %{__python} setup.py
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825456
--- Comment #7 from lnie ---
>In the section %if %{with_python3} ... %else ... %endif that defines
>BuildRequires and Requires,
> it is better to factor out the common BRs/Rs,
yeah,much clearer now,thanks.
>Is it really the case that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821189
--- Comment #3 from Aniket Pradhan ---
Hey Hirotaka,
Sorry I got a bit late. Most of these issues starting coming up recently and
many updates have come through since I put up this review. I'll update the
version first, and then I'll try to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830712
--- Comment #12 from Raphael Groner ---
> Raphael, are you going to run fedora-review, since you took the review?
>> Raphael, can you complete the formal review? (You can approve the package
>> now that the contributor is sponsored.)
Well,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844699
Bug ID: 1844699
Summary: Review Request: kuserfeedback - Framework for
collecting user feedback
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815670
--- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter ---
(In reply to Mohamed El Morabity from comment #6)
> Version 8.20.6.1 is available ;)
Updated
> In the .spec file:
> > # Remove installation requirement. Fedora is using a different name, see
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844696
Bug ID: 1844696
Summary: Review Request: Pytest plugin for Sanic - Pytest
plugin for Sanic
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830712
--- Comment #11 from Andrea Perotti ---
(In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #10)
> E.g., what my pedantic eyes catch is the inconsistent alignment here:
> BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils
> BuildRequires: libappstream-glib
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833477
dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833476
dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469
--- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Jerry, as we seem to be getting towards the end of the list of
new packages, could you give me a quick summary some time of which
new packages were added to Fedora in the end? (Too many emails ...)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833476
dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833471
dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830712
--- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler ---
E.g., what my pedantic eyes catch is the inconsistent alignment here:
BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils
BuildRequires: libappstream-glib
BuildRequires: extra-cmake-modules
BuildRequires: cmake(Qt5Core)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1833469
dan.cer...@cgc-instruments.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830712
--- Comment #9 from Kevin Kofler ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #7)
> Kevin, did you run fedora-review?
No, I didn't, I would have posted the output if I did.
To get a first impression of the quality of a specfile, I tend to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830712
--- Comment #8 from Andrea Perotti ---
(In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #6)
> At a first glance, the specfile looks reasonable to me. Just please also
> write your name in the changelog and not only the e-mail address.
Updated
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1838686
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #51 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839542
--- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter ---
(In reply to Lyes Saadi from comment #3)
> (In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #2)
> I think you sent the wrong spec?
>
> Here (https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/snallygaster.spec), I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836568
--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter ---
(In reply to Javier Peña from comment #2)
> I'll take a more in-depth look one graphql-core is built.
>
> From the spec file, I'd only modify the "Requires:
> python3dist(graphql-core) >= 3~a0"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1836567
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(mail@fabian-affol |
|ter.ch)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830712
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|projects...@smart.ms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821346
Hirotaka Wakabayashi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821189
--- Comment #2 from Hirotaka Wakabayashi ---
Hello Aniket,
Thank you for submitting the package. As you say, this package needs no
"python" prefix because this package is not a library package. Please see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825456
--- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
Lili, could you please also see Miro's question here:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3UL6WXFP4JHUJRH6BUT5XSWLKTTDT5XE/
--
You are receiving
42 matches
Mail list logo
