https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860729
Qiyu Yan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860729
--- Comment #5 from Bob Hepple ---
Cool - that stopped the compiler error.
This is now the code:
if (setgid(getgid()) != 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "devmgr: setgid: %s\n", strerror(errno));
return 1;
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860729
--- Comment #4 from Qiyu Yan ---
(In reply to Bob Hepple from comment #3)
> Thanks for the review!
>
> From the upstream homepage: "wshowkeys must be configured as setuid during
> installation. It requires root permissions to read input event
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860729
--- Comment #3 from Bob Hepple ---
Thanks for the review!
From the upstream homepage: "wshowkeys must be configured as setuid during
installation. It requires root permissions to read input events. These
permissions are dropped after startup.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122388
Clint Savage changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860941
Qiyu Yan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860729
--- Comment #2 from Qiyu Yan ---
Since /usr/bin/wshowkeys has setuid flag, things are getting diffficult
(otherwise this will be a security risk)
What you should do (I think) is
- Suggest: Check if the setuid is needed
- Must: set %global _h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
--- Comment #4 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/binaryen/binaryen.spec
SRPM URL:
https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/binaryen/binaryen-95-2.fc33.src.rpm
- use built binaries in test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860729
Bob Hepple changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860772
--- Comment #2 from Bob Hepple ---
Hi Aleksei,
Thanks for the link... that source0 line works fine!! Dunno how many
combinations I tried but I couldn't get it to work.
I also changed the Summary/Description to specify 'sway'.
Spec URL:
htt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860012
--- Comment #3 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #2)
> Package builds cleanly in a Fedora 33/Rawhide x86_64 local mock environment,
> but fails via `fedora-review` (possibly related to recent annobin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350884
--- Comment #34 from Andy Mender ---
> I don't see a pkgconfig provided by gmp-devel or libmpc-devel.
No worries then.
> I got rid of the remaining libtool archive. I'm afraid I don't understand
> what header files or static objects should
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860772
Aleksei Bavshin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alebast...@gmail.com
Doc Ty
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861190
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861188
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861187
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861185
Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858781
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1857199
--- Comment #2 from František Zatloukal ---
SPEC: https://gist.github.com/frantisekz/52551d4f22f4e6a127aa5d2d4411a401
SRPM:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6399/48026399/mozjs78-78.1.0-1.fc33.src.rpm
Updated to 78.1.0 .
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861440
Bug ID: 1861440
Summary: Review Request: rig - system event monitoring and data
collection utility
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861435
Bug ID: 1861435
Summary: Review Request: python-pytest-venv - py.test fixture
for creating a virtual environment
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837107
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-8799364879 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-tes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859635
Bug 1859635 depends on bug 1859602, which changed state.
Bug 1859602 Summary: Review Request: perl-Object-Pad - Simple syntax for
lexical slot-based objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859602
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859602
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|perl-Object-Pad-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859635
Bug 1859635 depends on bug 1859605, which changed state.
Bug 1859605 Summary: Review Request: perl-Syntax-Keyword-Dynamically -
Dynamically change the value of a variable
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859605
What|R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859605
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|perl-Syntax-Keyw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859635
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859635
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Future-AsyncAwait
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800429
--- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner ---
Copied over from bug #1788327 (rewiew GL4ES):
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #10)
> (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #3)
> > Thanks for the hints. I'll continue asap due to l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788327
--- Comment #13 from Raphael Groner ---
Propably better for bug #1800429:
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #10)
> (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #3)
> > Thanks for the hints. I'll continue asap due to limited time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788327
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||Upstream
Link ID|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826439
--- Comment #29 from igor.ivanov...@gmail.com ---
Hello,
Do you see other issue?
Thanks,
Igor
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859635
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ---
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/27251
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859635
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859602
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859605
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788327
--- Comment #11 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #8)
> (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #6)
> > There is an issue if you have a package that will provides libGL.so.1.
...
> > Best
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1788327
--- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #3)
> Thanks for the hints. I'll continue asap due to limited time.
>
> This request is mainly a preparation to give to the emulator box86 a chance
>
38 matches
Mail list logo