https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221548
Archit Sharma changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(arcsh...@gmail.co |needinfo-
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872427
--- Comment #3 from Mohamed Aboubakr ---
Created attachment 1715005
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1715005=edit
Spec file that include changes for Fedora and Redhat.
I resolved the comments that were given in previous
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875517
--- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Yep, adding %{optflags} as EXTRA_CFLAGS, assuming that means they get appended
at the end, should be fine as they will override the defaults. I'll take
another pass at this tonight.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291
Bug ID: 1879291
Summary: Review Request: python-bokeh - Interactive plots and
applications in the browser from Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879291
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878529
--- Comment #5 from Boian Bonev ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bbonev/iotop/fedora/fedora/iotop-c.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/bbonev/iotop/raw/fedora/fedora/iotop-c-1.12-1.fc32.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878529
--- Comment #4 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki ---
Either solution is fine, though you must provide both the updated spec and the
rebuilt SRPM.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878902
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andymenderu...@gmail.com
Doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876670
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878908
--- Comment #2 from Colin Walters ---
I'm not honestly sure I'm going to upload it to the official crates.io - the
sources here can be gathered by using `cargo publish --dry-run` from git.
bootupd is much like afterburn in that it's not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878046
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andymenderu...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878908
Steve Milner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||smil...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1837107
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(andymenderunix@gm |
|ail.com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878350
Andy Mender changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878529
--- Comment #3 from Boian Bonev ---
Thanks for the suggestions!
Should I regenerate and replace the source rpm? Or provide another link?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878143
--- Comment #8 from Andy Mender ---
> I opened an issue about the missing tests and I will talk to the developer of
> the package that depends on python-uptime if he is willing to move to a
> different module. python-uptime looks a little
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997
--- Comment #6 from Andy Mender ---
> Locally the performance tests are passing but are slowing down the build
> process with no real value for us.
>
> %changelog
> * Mon Sep 14 2020 Fabian Affolter - 1.2.0-3
> - Make performance tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876864
--- Comment #3 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki ---
>%package devel
>Requires:%{name}-libs%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
This cannot be satisfied, since there's no kealib-libs subpackage.
Did you mean "%{name}%{?_isa} =
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878046
--- Comment #3 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki ---
The package fails to install:
>nothing provides python3-gojbect needed by screenkey-1.2-2.fc34.noarch
This is probably a typo: "gojbect" -> "gobject"
There are gettext translation files (.po)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878529
Artur Frenszek-Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876259
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-URI-cpan-1.007-4.fc34
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876259
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-1da58546d4 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1da58546d4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876259
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-5b408002a0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5b408002a0
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876259
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862842
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bca491b47c has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bca491b47c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879209
Bug ID: 1879209
Summary: Review Request: rust-peg-macros - Procedural macros
for rust-peg
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879207
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1879209
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879209
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1879207
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879207
Bug ID: 1879207
Summary: Review Request: rust-peg-runtime - Runtime support for
rust-peg grammars
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878279
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-23845d9c7c has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875865
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-0e7da6c1c5 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862842
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878279
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-4be3f9a561 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875865
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-d3044d0488 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903
--- Comment #3 from Susi Lehtola ---
The unretiring guideline
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers says:
"Restore the contents in GIT and prepare a new build and update (if necessary)"
which means that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878143
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a84bbc290a has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-a84bbc290a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876259
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-URI-cpan
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878143
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-d5d438bef9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d5d438bef9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878143
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-5cbb79fe31 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5cbb79fe31
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878143
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
Which parts do you think are worth keeping? Certainly not the automatic
rebuilds. Even the "update to " entries aren't worth keeping, in my
opinion, since we're starting out on a newer version than the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876259
--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth ---
Thanks Petr.
Repo request:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/29079
I'll fix the perl(URI) categorisation on import.
I'll switch to %{make_install} after branching for epel7, which
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879119
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gitlint
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878279
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877691
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875906
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878134
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1877882
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879119
Stephen Kitt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|majop...@redhat.com
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878903
Susi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||susi.leht...@iki.fi
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876259
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Petr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879119
--- Comment #2 from Miguel Angel Ajo ---
Created attachment 1714931
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1714931=edit
A copy of the reviewed gitlint.spec file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879119
Miguel Angel Ajo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879119
Miguel Angel Ajo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||majop...@redhat.com
Doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878143
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-uptime
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879119
Bug ID: 1879119
Summary: Review Request: gitlint - Git commit message linting
tool
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878143
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
(In reply to Andy Mender from comment #1)
> There is a bit of a chicken and egg problem with python-uptime and tests.
> The project itself provides tests so it's possible to add a %check phase to
> the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878806
Stephen Kitt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876259
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879067
--- Comment #4 from Tomas Mraz ---
These packages should be temporary so at some not so far in future point they
should disappear. The 3.0 ABI should be stable for many years so when the
openssl3.0 compat package would need to be introduced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875997
--- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter ---
Locally the performance tests are passing but are slowing down the build
process with no real value for us.
%changelog
* Mon Sep 14 2020 Fabian Affolter - 1.2.0-3
- Make performance tests optional
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879067
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(decathorpe@gmail. |
|com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879067
Tomas Mraz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(decathorpe@gmail.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878237
--- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson ---
We need a slightly older version due to dep issues (which will be fixed RSN):
SPEC: https://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/rust-picky-asn1-x509.spec
SRPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879067
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879067
Bug ID: 1879067
Summary: Review Request: compat-openssl11 - Compatibility
version of the OpenSSL library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1875726
Zdenek Dohnal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878977
Nils Philippsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: -|for accessing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878977
Nils Philippsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878976
Nils Philippsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872601
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - Same as before, use:
>
> %global goipath github.com/vbauerster/mpb/v5
>
> - Rename your SPEC and bug to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878971
--- Comment #3 from Aurelien Bompard ---
Ah, my bad, I thought I fixed that but I fixed it only on the other packages.
Updated, thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878279
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-f35337829c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-f35337829c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878279
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-23845d9c7c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-23845d9c7c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878279
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739133
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(rjo...@redhat.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878806
Miguel Angel Ajo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878806
--- Comment #6 from Miguel Angel Ajo ---
Thanks
[majopela@bluehat Downloads]$ rpmlint gitlint.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1876259
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1878990
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872601
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872583
--- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter ---
%changelog
* Tue Sep 15 2020 Fabian Affolter - 2.6.1-1
- Update to latest upstream release 2.6.1
Updated files:
Spec URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-d5-tengo-2.spec
SRPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872583
--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter ---
Updated files:
Spec URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-d5-tengo-2.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/golang-github-d5-tengo-2-2.6.0-2.fc32.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1872583
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878971
--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter ---
(In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #1)
> I guess that "%{__python} -m pytest tests.py" (%{__python} unversioned) will
> prevent fedora-review from running.
Yes, it does.
'PS1': ' \\s-\\v\\$ ',
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878971
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878977
Bug ID: 1878977
Summary: Review Request: -
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878976
Bug ID: 1878976
Summary: Review Request: python-bravado-core - Library for
adding Swagger support to clients and servers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
87 matches
Mail list logo
