https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044188
Bug ID: 2044188
Summary: Review Request: mingw-python-tomli - MinGW Windows
Python tomli library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043542
--- Comment #1 from Lumír Balhar ---
* The tarball the Source0 URL points to is different than the tarball you have
in the SRPM.
* Also, there is no LICENSE file upstream, add it, please.
* A big problem is also that the RPM package does not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036468
--- Comment #33 from Neal Gompa ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041270
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-3d5fd3b7d1 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041270
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036468
--- Comment #32 from Neal Gompa ---
Posting this to make fedora-review stop choking...
Spec URL: https://www4.cs.fau.de/~erhardt/foo/mold/mold.spec
SRPM URL: https://www4.cs.fau.de/~erhardt/foo/mold/mold-1.0.2-1.fc35.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922783
Eugene A. Pivnev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037645
Mark E. Fuller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983887
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983884
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983877
--- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini ---
There is cargo-license, but it obviously does not take into account any of our
downstream patches or modifications.
I usually use this bash script inside the mock chroot after running a build
with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036468
--- Comment #31 from Christoph Erhardt ---
New status: everything working fine on epel8, epel9, f34, f35 and rawhide for
x86_64 and aarch64.
Packages for other architectures remain held back until mold becomes capable of
producing native
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983877
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036468
--- Comment #30 from Christoph Erhardt ---
mold 1.0.2 was released earlier today; I have updated the package accordingly.
[Sorry for wasting a fair amount of Copr processor time in the process - but I
needed to pinpoint a show-stopping
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036468
Christoph Erhardt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983887
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983886
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983884
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983881
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983880
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983877
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983879
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983877
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983876
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Please regenerate the .spec file with rust2rpm 20 before building this package
for Fedora.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983876
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983875
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983456
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983562
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983402
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983343
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983547
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983543
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983541
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983402
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983343
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982946
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982945
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982500
--- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini ---
Yes, but that's only mildly less bad.
Both Apache-2.0 and MIT licenses *require* that redistributed sources include a
copy of the license text.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982500
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #3)
> Hold your horses.
>
> - Please ask upstream to add a license file in their crate
>
> Since neither the crate nor the upstream git repository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982942
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982911
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982907
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982942
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982886
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982883
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982911
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982877
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982500
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982907
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981141
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981140
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982886
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981133
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981129
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982883
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980623
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982877
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980205
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982500
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979780
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979754
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978432
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981141
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981140
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981133
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
Doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981129
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937041
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806999
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981103
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936728
--- Comment #2 from Rich Mattes ---
Thanks for the ping. I left it at version 4 because gazebo 11 has a hard
version dep on this package:
https://github.com/osrf/gazebo/blob/gazebo11/cmake/SearchForStuff.cmake#L802
There has beena 4.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980623
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980205
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979780
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042043
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler ---
The main question that comes to my mind here is: if INDI declares those
libraries as "3rdparty", why are you using INDI as the upstream here? Are the
original upstream projects dead? Does INDI require
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979754
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1978432
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964682
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941362
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1940835
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1937302
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(dwa...@redhat.com |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936728
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750045
--- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Bump
We have new font build system. Try these spec and srpm:
https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/mooniak-abhaya-fonts.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006765
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731
--- Comment #135 from Simone Caronni ---
Do we have anything else to cover as part of the review?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731
--- Comment #134 from Simone Caronni ---
(In reply to Björn Persson from comment #133)
> I took the time to write a patch. Here's how to avoid trusting a key whose
> owner says not to trust it.
Thank you!
I finally have time to work on it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041270
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #8 from
86 matches
Mail list logo