https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394940
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 2106656
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2106656&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9552880 to 9555313
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2382327
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gitlab.com/fedora/p
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2388768
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9554717
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2388768-nix/fedora-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2395004
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9554961
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2395004-python-cupy/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2395004
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 2106619
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2106619&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9553806 to 9554961
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2388113
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Assignee|nob...@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228190
--- Comment #16 from Benson Muite ---
1) To be able to install the desktop file, based on
https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-toolkit-gtk3/issues/453
please change
%{python3} setup.py install --prefix=%{buildroot}%{_prefix}
to
%{python3} setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2392647
--- Comment #30 from Yonghang Wang ---
the same. in uploaded srpm files have 644. but changed to 666 in rebuilt
srpms.
```
# rpm -qlvp http://a1.xwalker.click/seergdb-2.5-1.amzn2023.src.rpm
-rw-r--r--1 mockbuil mock84
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2366188
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch
Flag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2304058
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394974
Mikel Olasagasti Uranga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mi...@olasagasti.info
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2388768
--- Comment #28 from Jens Petersen ---
So I actually tried to install the libs into %{_libdir}/nix and after
patching `install_rpath` into the meson.build files got it working.
But rpmlint seemed to complain without sonames so reverting to dow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2395004
--- Comment #4 from tom@amd.com ---
Spec URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/python-cupy.spec
SRPM URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/python-cupy-13.6.0-1.fc44.src.rpm
For the update
The changes
>> [!]: If the package is under multiple li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394974
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 2106611
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2106611&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9553792 to 9554960
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394974
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9554960
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2394974-kompose/fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394974
--- Comment #8 from Brad Smith ---
Many thanks Maxwell and Mikel. You comments improved the specfile.
I created a docs subpackage.
I often debate build and check settings in the spec file between following the
upstream as, for example, defin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181580
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(steve.traylen@cer |
|n.ch)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262694
--- Comment #68 from Jonathan Steffan ---
[!]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
/usr/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2395004
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Steffan ---
[!]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
This
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2262694
Jonathan Steffan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathanstef...@gmail.com
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2395053
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||AutomationTriaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2366188
--- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen ---
Finally
`rake test` is not recommended here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Ruby/#_running_test_suites
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2395053
Bug ID: 2395053
Summary: Review Request: rust-serde_core - Serde traits
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproj
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394940
--- Comment #3 from Ben Beasley ---
(Oh, and "cmake" is cmake 3.x since EPEL8. Now that EPEL7 is EOL, there is no
reason to write BuildRequires: cmake3. Just use BuildRequires: cmake.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2395004
Jonathan Steffan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathanstef...@gmail.com
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2366188
--- Comment #4 from Steve Traylen ---
To add
$ rpm -qf /usr/share/gems/gems/base64-0.2.0/lib/base64.rb
ruby-bundled-gems-3.4.5-27.fc44.x86_64
$ rpm -q --whatprovides 'rubygem(base64)'
ruby-bundled-gems-3.4.5-27.fc44.x86_64
From
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2388768
--- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen ---
Spec URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/nix/nix.spec
SRPM URL:
https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/nix/nix-2.31.1-4.fc44.src.rpm
- add simple check with LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Koji scratch bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2388645
--- Comment #4 from Tomi Lähteenmäki ---
@ngompa have you had time to take a look?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2388110
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|RELEASE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394940
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@musicinmybrain.net
--- Comment #2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2388110
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2388110
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2366188
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2390314
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Steve Traylen has canceled Package Review
's request for Steve Traylen
's needinfo:
Bug 2181580: Review Request: rubygem-minitar - Provides the ability to deal
with POSIX tar(1) archive files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394974
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 2106559
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2106559&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9553527 to 9553792
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394974
--- Comment #6 from Maxwell G ---
> 2. Documentation is a web based user guide under the docs subdirectory. The
> --no-docs dnf flag will strip it out.
It's still a guideline to put large documentation directories in a doc
subpackage.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2376217
--- Comment #59 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9551255
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2376217-openbao/fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2228190
--- Comment #15 from Ibiam Chihurumnaya ---
I've added a desktop file but living it in the build throws an error,
validation works just fine too;
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8942/136998942/build.log.
So I had to remove it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2392647
--- Comment #22 from Yonghang Wang ---
let's try using original srpm then copr rebuilt srpm:)
copr(running):
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/xwalker/seergdb/build/9535521/
srpm: http://a1.xwalker.click/seergdb-2.5-1.amzn2023.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2389401
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-81ee29cb82 (rust-async-broadcast-0.7.2-4.el10_1,
rust-endi-1.1.0-4.el10_1, and 10 more) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.1
stable repository.
If problem still persists, please
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2395004
tom@amd.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2395004
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://cupy.dev/
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394974
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9553792
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2394974-kompose/fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2376217
Maxwell G changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394974
Maxwell G changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maxw...@gtmx.me
--- Comment #2 from Maxwe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
Bug 177841 depends on bug 2391300, which changed state.
Bug 2391300 Summary: Review Request: postgresql16-anonymizer - Anonymizer
extension for postgresql
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2391300
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279244
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 2106544
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2106544&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9395352 to 9553563
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2386164
--- Comment #6 from David Auer ---
Correction: The email notifications were actually there, just slipped through
the cracks, sorry.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279244
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9553563
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2279244-basalt/fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279244
--- Comment #30 from Jonathan Steffan ---
Spec URL: https://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/imrsv/basalt.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/imrsv/basalt-2.0.1-1.20250912git3388c6e.fc42.src.rpm
Changelog:
- Update to latest commit
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394974
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9553527
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2394974-kompose/fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394974
Bug ID: 2394974
Summary: Review Request: kompose - Orphaned for 2 years.
Returing to Fedora
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2386164
--- Comment #5 from David Auer ---
For some reason I didn't get email notifications of your reply -.- Thanks for
fixing and clearing things up!
The copr builds for f42 and f41 fail because of some mismatch in the python
metadata, those can be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2392425
Artur Frenszek-Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394794
Bug ID: 2394794
Summary: Review Request: python-assertpy - Simple assertion
library for unit testing in Python with a fluent API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2391300
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Review Service
---
Hello @pkhartsk,
since this is your first Fedora package, you need to get sponsored by a package
sponsor before it can be accepted.
A sponsor is an experienced package maintainer who will guide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2393738
--- Comment #9 from Neel Chauhan ---
Spec URL: https://neelc.org/fedora/smtprelay3/smtprelay.spec
SRPM URL: https://neelc.org/fedora/smtprelay3/smtprelay-1.12.0-1.fc44.src.rpm
I made the changes (again). Please approve/comment.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2388112
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2388768
--- Comment #19 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Hmm, almost all nix commands immediately segfault with this build. But on
backtrace is generated. Any ideas?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2388768
--- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen ---
Well it got reverted as quickly again, lol
(https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/13970 sigh).
I feel like the unexpected backporting was the last straw.
So I am wondering now if moving the libraries out of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394931
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|benson_mu...@emailplus.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394931
Bug ID: 2394931
Summary: Review Request: botan3 - Crypto and TLS for C++
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394940
Bug ID: 2394940
Summary: Review Request: SPIRV-Cross - SPIRV-Cross is a tool
designed for parsing and converting SPIR-V to other
shader languages.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302630
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Assignee|nob...@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302630
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|decatho...@gmail.com|nob...@fedoraproject.org
Stat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394940
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://github.com/KhronosG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2392596
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2025-7247a13738 has been pushed to the Fedora 41 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2386141
tom@amd.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(tom@amd.com) |
--- Comment #2 from tom@amd.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2392647
--- Comment #41 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 2106440
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2106440&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9543598 to 9551472
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394931
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||AutomationTriaged
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394931
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 2106498
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2106498&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9552699 to 9552731
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2392596
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2025-8fdaef8176 has been pushed to the Fedora 43 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2392596
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2391300
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RELEASE_PENDING |MODIFIED
--- Comment #28 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2392596
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2025-10a3214e18 (dustrac-2.1.1-3.fc42) has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 42.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-10a3214e18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2389401
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2025-f84ca818d3 (rust-async-broadcast-0.7.2-4.el10_2,
rust-endi-1.1.0-4.el10_2, and 11 more) has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 10.2
stable repository.
If problem still persists, please
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2363932
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2025-77febb7f1a (perl-ExtUtils-Builder-Compiler-0.031-3.fc43) has been
pushed to the Fedora 43 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2387789
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2025-efdfcdbdef (perl-Crypt-SysRandom-XS-0.009-2.fc43) has been pushed
to the Fedora 43 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2389401
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2025-5acdf83593 (python-uv-build-0.8.11-2.fc43,
rust-secret-service-5.1.0-1.fc43, and 1 more) has been pushed to the Fedora 43
stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2363933
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2025-c280d7fc69 (perl-Dist-Build-0.020-3.fc43) has been pushed to the
Fedora 43 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2392382
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2387827
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2025-4573b22206 (perl-Crypt-SysRandom-0.007-1.fc43) has been pushed to
the Fedora 43 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2363929
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2025-f6a84afc2c (perl-File-ShareDir-Tiny-0.001-3.fc43) has been pushed
to the Fedora 43 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2363931
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2025-09e8cae4f8 (perl-ExtUtils-Builder-0.017-3.fc43) has been pushed to
the Fedora 43 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394873
Bug ID: 2394873
Summary: Review Request: rust-moxcms - Simple Color Management
in Rust
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394872
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://crates.io/crates/px
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2394873
Fedora Review Service changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://crates.io/crates/mo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2317888
--- Comment #49 from Petr Menšík ---
Just a note: It seems this package would be soon added into RHEL 10 at least to
bring QUIC support for Samba. It probably stop presence in EPEL 10 eventually
and be part of RHEL/CentOS 10 directly. Devel pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2382327
Frédéric Bérat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Comment|0 |updated
--- Comment #0 has been edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2392596
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2025-7247a13738 (dustrac-2.1.1-3.fc41) has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 41.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-7247a13738
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2392504
Artur Frenszek-Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
B
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2388110
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9551407
(failed)
Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2388110-rust-icu_segmenter/fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2306513
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Review Service
---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/9551268
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2306513-php-smarty4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2306513
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 2106437
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2106437&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9494728 to 9551268
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2392596
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RELEASE_PENDING |MODIFIED
--- Comment #8 from F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2306513
--- Comment #13 from Xavier Bachelot ---
Ok, I've filed https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/78319
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this produ
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2306513
--- Comment #12 from Remi Collet ---
> I'm not perfectly happy with not using the tarball from github ...
I have fought a lot against this .gitattributes file
which is a workaround to the missing installer for PHP library
(composer is NOT an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2376217
--- Comment #58 from Fedora Review Service
---
Created attachment 2106438
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=2106438&action=edit
The .spec file difference from Copr build 9548140 to 9551255
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2306513
--- Comment #9 from Xavier Bachelot ---
Spec URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/php-smarty4.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/php-smarty4-4.5.6-2.fc44.src.rpm
Thanks for the comment Remi !
I've removed the needless
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2388113
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 7503 matches
Mail list logo
