[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Susi Lehtola changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|505154 (FE-SCITECH) | Referenced

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Bug 1040517 depends on bug 1109390, which changed state. Bug 1109390 Summary: Review Request: llvm33 - Versioned LLVM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Bug 1040517 depends on bug 1109390, which changed state. Bug 1109390 Summary: Review Request: llvm3.3 - Versioned LLVM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|julia-0.3.1-2.fc21

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #85 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- julia-0.3.1-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/julia-0.3.1-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #84 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- julia-0.3.1-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/julia-0.3.1-2.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #82 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- julia-0.3.1-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/julia-0.3.1-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Bug 1040517 depends on bug 1108765, which changed state. Bug 1108765 Summary: Review Request: dSFMT - Double precision SIMD-oriented Fast Mersenne Twister https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108765 What|Removed

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs?

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #79 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #80 from Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #78) Great! Thank you Paulo, and all the people who helped me finish this Julia package, and by the way learn RPM

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #81 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- (In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #80) (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #78) Great! Thank you Paulo, and all the people who helped me finish this Julia

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #73 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- (In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #72) (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #71) The test suite already checks that AFAIK. But then I guess it's run when

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #74 from Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #73) (In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #72) (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #71) The test

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #69 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- (In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #68) You probably saw I posted to devel@ earlier today about issues with rpath/runpath. I was waiting for some comment on that before

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #70 from Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #69) (In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #68) You probably saw I posted to devel@ earlier today about issues

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #71 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- (In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #70) At first I only suggest this pseudo patch to the spec: -rm -R %{buildroot}%{_docdir}/julia/html/_sources Because there is that

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #72 from Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #71) (In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #70) At first I only suggest this pseudo patch to the spec:

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #66 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- %files doc %doc %{_docdir}/julia/ Even shorter: %files doc %{_docdir}/julia/ That's because %_docdir is in default %__docdir_path list. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #67 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- (In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #65) 1) I believe none of the installed Makefile files are required (or functional): $ find /usr/share/julia/ -name Makefile

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #68 from Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com --- You probably saw I posted to devel@ earlier today about issues with rpath/runpath. I was waiting for some comment on that before replying, but none so far...

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #62 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Thanks! I think I did not see the failure because I've not run the updates for a few weeks on my F20 box. IIUC this option was removed in systemtap 2.5. I've filed a bug against

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #64 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- (In reply to Paulo Andrade from comment #63) I did a normal rpmbuild and installed it, and a fedora-review from generated srpm with my initial proposed patch, to ensure it was

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #65 from Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com --- 1) I believe none of the installed Makefile files are required (or functional): $ find /usr/share/julia/ -name Makefile

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #60 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Would anybody finish the review? :-p -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #55 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Anybody willing to do the final review? It's been 10 months since I first opened this request! :-) Now I think it's OK at last. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #56 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- Have you pointed the fedora-review tool at this ticket yet? - fedora-review -b 1040517 After a brief look at the spec file, I think there are a couple of places that would benefit

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #57 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #56) Have you pointed the fedora-review tool at this ticket yet? - fedora-review -b 1040517 I wish I was able to do it myself, but I'm

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #58 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Hold on, I've found the problem with fedora-review: it was not finding dSFMT-devel, but the error message was really obscure. I'll post the review in a moment. -- You are

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #59 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- OK, here's the review, which looks mostly OK to me. A few remarks: - the only Fail is about a dist tag which must be due to my box's setup. - I can fix the Issue about unversioned

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||505154

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Bug 1040517 depends on bug 1109390, which changed state. Bug 1109390 Summary: Review Request: llvm3.3 - Versioned LLVM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #54 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- I'm eventually going to use LLVM 3.4 instead of requiring a new llvm3.3 package. Julia developers are willing to support several versions of LLVM, including 3.4 and 3.5. So the

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #53 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- dSFMT is not linked to, it's dlopened at runtime by Julia, this is why it's not picked by RPM. Will add it to Requires. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Robert Knight kni...@princeton.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i...@cicku.me ---

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #50 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Orion, what's your opinion on bug 1109390? Packaging Julia is stuck on this issue and I'd like to know if I need to find something else. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #49 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- OK, I think the package is now ready for the final review. The new version works, though it needs dSFMT (bug 1108765) and llvm3.3 (bug 1109390) to be included. The only bundled

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #45 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- (In reply to Baurzhan Muftakhidinov from comment #44) (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #43) Now it would be good to understand why it doesn't work for EPEL6.

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #46 from Baurzhan Muftakhidinov baurthefi...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #45) (In reply to Baurzhan Muftakhidinov from comment #44) (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #43) Now it

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #47 from Baurzhan Muftakhidinov baurthefi...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #45) (In reply to Baurzhan Muftakhidinov from comment #44) (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #43) Now it

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #48 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- (In reply to Baurzhan Muftakhidinov from comment #46) I have tried already, took a gcc from software collections

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #44 from Baurzhan Muftakhidinov baurthefi...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #43) (In reply to Baurzhan Muftakhidinov from comment #42) Hi, I put rhel version there to ensure that build passes.

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #43 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- (In reply to Baurzhan Muftakhidinov from comment #42) Hi, I put rhel version there to ensure that build passes. Otherwise, without second check, %if 0%{?fedora} 20 was true for

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1109390

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Bug 1040517 depends on bug 1098534, which changed state. Bug 1098534 Summary: Package relying on a specific LLVM version https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098534 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #40 from Baurzhan Muftakhidinov baurthefi...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #38) Could anybody on 32-bit check whether Julia starts correctly with the following package on F20? What's changed is that

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1108765

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #41 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Yes, I've considered EPEL, but as a first step I wanted to get the package working for Fedora. But thanks for looking at it, I can make sure the package is clean for EPEL. (In

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #42 from Baurzhan Muftakhidinov baurthefi...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #41) Yes, I've considered EPEL, but as a first step I wanted to get the package working for Fedora. But thanks for looking

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #39 from Baurzhan Muftakhidinov baurthefi...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #38) Could anybody on 32-bit check whether Julia starts correctly with the following package on F20? What's changed is that

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Bug 1040517 depends on bug 1058019, which changed state. Bug 1058019 Summary: Review Request: utf8proc - Library for processing UTF-8 encoded Unicode strings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058019 What|Removed

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #38 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Could anybody on 32-bit check whether Julia starts correctly with the following package on F20? What's changed is that it should now run on all i386 CPUs, not only on recent ones

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Bug 1040517 depends on bug 1089500, which changed state. Bug 1089500 Summary: Review Request: openlibm - High quality system independent, open source libm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089500 What|Removed

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #37 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Temporary bundling exceptions granted for libuv and Rmath. dSFMT is going to be packaged and Julia will use that instead (which may need changes upstream since currently dSFMT does

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #35 from Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #34) Yeah, but LLVM 3.4 triggers problems when running the tests (cf. comments above). In the meantime, you can replace llvm-libs-3.4 with

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1098534

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #36 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Neal: Yeah, this works on build VMs, but is less practical on your own machine. See bug 1098534. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|ndbeck...@gmail.com | CC|

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #33 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Needs rebuild after llvm-3.4 landed in updates: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-5319 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #34 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Yeah, but LLVM 3.4 triggers problems when running the tests (cf. comments above). In the meantime, you can replace llvm-libs-3.4 with the old 3.3 version from the fedora repo. --

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Bug 1040517 depends on bug 1062901, which changed state. Bug 1062901 Summary: Review Request: openspecfun - Library providing a collection of special mathematical functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062901 What

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #29 from Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com --- Is julia-release-basic not packaged? This is needed to run julia under emacs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #30 from Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com --- I tried using julia (0.3.0-prerelease) using emacs in ess. It appears to work without using julia-release-basic, so maybe this is no longer required? -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #31 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- julia-release-basic/julia-basic existed until recently, when the Julia-based readline implementation was merged. Now only the julia executable exists. -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #27 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Filed https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/6742 about the unexpected dependency on openspecfun-devel (also applies to openlibm). -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #28 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- I've created a copr project here: http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/nalimilan/julia/ It unveiled two more failures in the tests: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/6743

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #26 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Thanks, filed here: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/6722 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1089500

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 baurthefi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||baurthefi...@gmail.com ---

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #17 from baurthefi...@gmail.com --- 1. Builds on copr fail sometime due to failing test in file arpack.jl 2. After installing from copr, I got the following error message: Target architecture mismatch. Please delete or

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #18 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Orion: Yes, LLVM is going to be a problem. I've updated it manually to 3.4, but I don't know how to make it automatic, and more profoundly there's no guarantee that Julia will work

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #19 from baurthefi...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #18) Orion: Yes, LLVM is going to be a problem. I've updated it manually to 3.4, but I don't know how to make it automatic, and more profoundly

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #20 from baurthefi...@gmail.com --- I meant, when you compile julia on a newer CPU, its library file /usr/lib64/julia/sys.so may not work on older CPUs. See https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/julia-dev/Eqp0GhZWxME -- You

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #21 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- (In reply to Milan Bouchet-Valat from comment #18) Orion: Yes, LLVM is going to be a problem. I've updated it manually to 3.4, but I don't know how to make it automatic, and more

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #22 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- (In reply to baurthefirst from comment #19) Have you considered setting JULIA_CPU_TARGET to core2? By default it is set to native, thus causing the issue as I wrote earlier:

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #23 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- baurthefirst: Right, I'll fix that too. Orion: Thanks for the LLVM hint. I just have to hope that the situation where Julia does not support a new version of LLVM which is pushed

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #24 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Orion: How do you reproduce the ENETUNREACH tests failure? Do you need to disable the loopback interface? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #25 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- linux-user-chroot --unshare-net / rpmbuild copr builds should reproduce as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #13 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- ARM support would be nice to see. Misc: %exclude %{_libdir}/julia/libuv.a %exclude %{_libdir}/julia/libjulia-debug.so should not be necessary Blank lines between %changelog

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #14 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- The second exclude is not needed, but the first is because the libuv static library is not needed for Julia to run. I could include it in the -devel package, but I'm not sure which

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #15 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- Hmm, I would have thought rpm would complain about unpackaged files in the libuv.a case. I tend to prefer simply using rm in %install, but whatever you like best. The llvm version

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #12 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Are you OK with the new version? (FWIW, ARM support in Julia might well be ready for the next 0.3 version.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #11 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- OK, I've removed the julia meta-package. I'll request a new comp group when everything is packaged. So when utf8proc and openlibm will have been reviewed, everything will be ready.

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1062901

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #9 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- The meta-package thing was done with the idea that in the future more packages could be installed by default. What comes to mind, similar to what happens with R, is a host of

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com --- I believe meta-packages are frowned upon and comps groups preferred for this sort of thing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #6 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Thanks. I guess julia-devel should depend on julia-base, not on julia. I'll change that, but you can easily fix the .spec file if you want. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #7 from Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com --- I'm not certain, but I believe the explicit dependency should just be deleted. I believe rpm is supposed to add the correct dep here automatically. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ndbeck...@gmail.com

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Bug 1040517 depends on bug 1040027, which changed state. Bug 1040027 Summary: Review Request: double-conversion - Library providing binary-decimal and decimal-binary routines for IEEE doubles https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040027

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1058019

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Referenced

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #4 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- With double-conversion now in the repos, the new package builds fine on Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6305726 -- You are receiving this mail because:

  1   2   >