https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
Mihkel Vain tura...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
WARNING: Requested package name firefox-esteidpkcs11loader doesn't match bug
summary esteidpkcs11loader
Please correct.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|val...@civ.zcu.cz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
--- Comment #6 from Mihkel Vain tura...@gmail.com ---
Another option is to use same naming as its currently used in Fedora repos.
Meaning:
esteid-browser-plugin (digital signing browser plugin) instead of
firefox-esteid (#1054941)
and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
--- Comment #7 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz ---
If I understand correctly, this is different software than the current plugin
in Fedora?
I think this would be the proper way to do it:
1) get new set of packages to Fedora, for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
--- Comment #8 from Mihkel Vain tura...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: http://mihkel.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/firefox-esteidpkcs11loader.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mihkel.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/firefox-esteidpkcs11loader-3.8.0.1052-3.fc20.src.rpm
I've
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
--- Comment #4 from Mihkel Vain tura...@gmail.com ---
I'm struggling to decide what should I call this package and #1054941. #1054941
is called firefox-esteid right now because as upstream told me and as I wrote
in #1054941 comment:
This
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
--- Comment #2 from Mihkel Vain tura...@gmail.com ---
SPEC file: http://mihkel.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/esteidpkcs11loader.spec
SRPM:
http://mihkel.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/esteidpkcs11loader-3.8.0.1052-2.fc20.src.rpm
(In reply to František
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
--- Comment #3 from František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz ---
(In reply to Mihkel Vain from comment #2)
Version that is now in Fedora repos is based on old codebase. It was
developed by another company, but due to some confusion, contract
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
František Dvořák val...@civ.zcu.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||val...@civ.zcu.cz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
Mihkel Vain tura...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1090759
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
Bug 1054938 depends on bug 1054933, which changed state.
Bug 1054933 Summary: Review Request: esteidcerts - Estonian ID card certificates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054933
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
Mihkel Vain tura...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
Mihkel Vain tura...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1054933
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
Mihkel Vain tura...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1054941
Referenced
19 matches
Mail list logo
