https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063042
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063042
Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msu...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063042
Nitesh Narayan Lal niteshnarayanlal...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063042
--- Comment #5 from Nitesh Narayan Lal niteshnara...@fedoraproject.org ---
Please disregard the earlier comment, there is still work to be done here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063042
--- Comment #4 from Nitesh Narayan Lal niteshnara...@fedoraproject.org ---
Final changes made:
SPEC:http://niteshnarayan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/rubygem-em-socksify.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063042
Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mmo...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063042
--- Comment #2 from Eduardo Mayorga e...@mayorgalinux.com ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License
OK -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063042
Eduardo Mayorga e...@mayorgalinux.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063042
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
