https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
exciting-10-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
exciting-10-2.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-08c56a2194
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
--- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/exciting
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
--- Comment #20 from marcindulak ---
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
--- Comment #18 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
(libs.
> >
> > Generic:
> > [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
> > other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
--- Comment #17 from marcindulak ---
(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #14)
> Detailed review below.
>
>
>
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
--- Comment #13 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
One quick comment -
You can remove %defattr in the spec file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
--- Comment #15 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Started a koji scratch build on rawhide -
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12947738
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
--- Comment #16 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
nonamedotc's scratch build of exciting-10-1.el6.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12947738
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
--- Comment #12 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
marcin - I am very sorry about this delay. I will post a review in the next two
days.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
--- Comment #10 from marcindulak ---
New upstream release. Bundling of lbfgsb reintroduced taking into account the
recent changes in Fedora policy.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
marcindulak's scratch build of exciting-10-1.el6.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12225273
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
marcindulak's scratch build of exciting-10-1.el6.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12224498
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
--- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
marcindulak's scratch build of exciting-10-1.el6.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12225904
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
--- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
marcindulak's scratch build of exciting-7-1.el7.centos.src.rpm for epel7 failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11750266
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
--- Comment #4 from marcindulak marcin.du...@gmail.com ---
Update:
Spec URL:
https://marcindulak.fedorapeople.org/packages/exciting/r01.new/exciting.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
Bug 1064657 depends on bug 1192606, which changed state.
Bug 1192606 Summary: libxc needs rebuilding against gfortran 5.0.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192606
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
marcindulak marcin.du...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1192606
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
Bug 1064657 depends on bug 1104289, which changed state.
Bug 1104289 Summary: Review Request: FoXlibf - A Fortran XML Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1104289
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
marcindulak marcin.du...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1104289
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
--- Comment #3 from marcindulak marcin.du...@gmail.com ---
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/400
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
--- Comment #2 from marcindulak marcin.du...@gmail.com ---
Actually i have prepared an unbundled version of exciting
BLAS, LAPACK, FFTW, LIBXC, ERF, ARPACK, LBFGSB bundling is removed,
with an exception of FoX.
I'm communicating with exciting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064657
--- Comment #1 from Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com ---
Hi marcin,
I am interested in reviewing this package but it might be take me sometime to
do that. If you do not have time-related objections, I can take this package
for review.
29 matches
Mail list logo