https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|brd-1.0-2.fc19
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
Jeff Backus jeff.bac...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
brd-1.0-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/brd-1.0-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
brd-1.0-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/brd-1.0-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
--- Comment #12 from Jeff Backus jeff.bac...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Denis Fateyev from comment #11)
Thanks for the link, Rich. The wording used in this part of guidelines is a
bit unclear indeed. We keep the spec in its current state;
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
Jeff Backus jeff.bac...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
--- Comment #8 from Jeff Backus jeff.bac...@gmail.com ---
Hi Denis,
Thanks for your response!
According to the SourceURL#GitHub guidelines:
For a number of reasons (immutability, availability, uniqueness), you must use
the full commit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
--- Comment #9 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com ---
Well, I also found it a bit unclear. I asked my sponsor, and he told me so.
I think I need to investigate this topic more.
PS: IMO, the only benefit to use hashes instead of tags is to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richmat...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de...@fateyev.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
--- Comment #4 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
--- Comment #5 from Jeff Backus jeff.bac...@gmail.com ---
Hi Denis,
Thanks for reviewing!
Hmm. I apologize, please clarify re: which commit I should be referencing. I am
referencing commit f984731, which is what shows up at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
--- Comment #6 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com ---
I mean, you created the release tarball:
https://github.com/jsbackus/brd/archive/1.0.tar.gz
So you can surely use this path in source instead of that based on commit hash.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
Benedikt Morbach bmorb...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
--- Comment #3 from Jeff Backus jeff.bac...@gmail.com ---
Hi Benedikt,
(In reply to Benedikt Morbach from comment #2)
Note: This is an unofficial/preliminary review
Thanks for taking a look at it - no matter how official. :)
[!]:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
--- Comment #1 from Jeff Backus jeff.bac...@gmail.com ---
*** Bug 996 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
21 matches
Mail list logo
