https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117077
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117077
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Yes my bad, the pkgdb still cna't get refresh.
But it seems that the sponsoring process is quite easy, where is the informal
reviews?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117077
--- Comment #4 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
There are other ways of showing experience, its up to the sponsor to decide. In
this case packaging something non-trivial in a good way was more than enough
for me.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117077
Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117077
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Tubbs ctubbsii-fed...@apache.org ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #1)
What is 1.6.0 packaging?
Sorry for the confusing subject. I was trying to find an appropriate
description for the subject and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117077
Christopher Tubbs ctubbsii-fed...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117077
Christopher Tubbs ctubbsii-fed...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117077
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
