https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
Denis Arnaud changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pemen...@redhat.com
--- Comment #28 fro
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Component: Package Review
Package Review has canceled Package
Review 's request for James Hogarth
's needinfo:
Bug 1210993: Review Request: boost157 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++
source libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
--- Comment #25 from Denis Arnaud ---
Note that a newer version (Boost1.69) has been accepted a while ago:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1667725
Boost 1.72 (or even 1.73) should very soon make its way onto Fedora Rawhide.
I'll t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
--- Comment #24 from James Hogarth ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
- The BR for python-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
--- Comment #23 from Denis Arnaud ---
Ok, so, taking all of that into account, it gives:
Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/boost/boost157/boost157.spec
SRPM URL:
http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/boost/boost157/boost157-1.57.0-6.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
--- Comment #22 from James Hogarth ---
It does complain a bit ... but so long as things align correctly before import
it's not significant.
Just one thing left in review that I can see...
Please mark the licenses as %license rather than %doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
--- Comment #21 from Denis Arnaud ---
(In reply to James Hogarth from comment #20)
> There's no boost157.spec in your fedora people ...
>
> I'm guessing you missed a symlink?
>
> Placing this here to make fedora-review happy ...
>
> Spec U
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
--- Comment #20 from James Hogarth ---
There's no boost157.spec in your fedora people ...
I'm guessing you missed a symlink?
Placing this here to make fedora-review happy ...
Spec URL:
http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/boost/boost157/boo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
--- Comment #19 from Denis Arnaud ---
(In reply to James Hogarth from comment #17)
Suggestions integrated. It built cleanly on my local EPEL6. Build on EPEL7
running (see the link above in comment #18).
Thanks James!
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
Denis Arnaud changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(denis.arnaud_fedo |
|r...@m4x.org)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(denis.arnaud_fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
--- Comment #16 from Denis Arnaud ---
Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/boost/boost157/boost157.spec
SRPM URL:
http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/boost/boost157/boost157-1.57.0-4.src.rpm
Successful build on EPEL 7:
https://koji.f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
--- Comment #15 from Denis Arnaud ---
(In reply to James Hogarth from comment #14)
> Flag me when you're ready and I'll carry out the review.
Thanks! I am now ready, thanks to Docker images allowing building RPM for
Fedora and EPEL: http://gi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|james.hoga...@gmail.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
Denis Arnaud changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(denis.arnaud_fedo |
|r...@m4x.org)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||james.hoga...@gmail.com
Fl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
--- Comment #11 from Denis Arnaud ---
(In reply to Carl George from comment #10)
> I'll go ahead and give some initial feedback that I noticed in the spec file.
Thanks Carl, appreciated!
> 1. BuildRoot isn't needed for EL6+, so it can be re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
--- Comment #10 from Carl George ---
I haven't done a formal package review before, but I'm happy to learn. Based
on the docs [1] "any Fedora account holder who is a member of the packager
group" can do it, so I think I'm good permissions-wis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
--- Comment #9 from Denis Arnaud ---
(In reply to Carl George from comment #8)
> Since this hasn't been reviewed yet, would you consider rebasing this to
> 1.59.0 (boost159)? I would find it useful for building MySQL 5.7 on EL6.
Sure, yes. I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
Carl George changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||carl.geo...@rackspace.com
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
--- Comment #7 from Denis Arnaud ---
Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/boost/boost157/boost157.spec
SRPM URL:
http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/boost/boost157/boost157-1.57.0-3.src.rpm
Fixed a few architecture dependency issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
--- Comment #6 from Denis Arnaud ---
Thanks! In case you can formally review (and approve!) that package, do not
hesitate then :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about chang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
Xiangyang Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||che...@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
--- Comment #4 from Denis Arnaud ---
Re-used the same packaging techniques as for Boost148 (see #921134), around the
source code of Boost-1.57 for Fedora 22
(http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/boost.git/tree/?h=f22).
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
Denis Arnaud changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
--- Comment #3 from Denis Arnaud ---
Successful builds on all the architectures:
EPEL 6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9463323
EPEL 7: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9463310
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
--- Comment #2 from Denis Arnaud ---
Successful builds:
EPEL 6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9463308
EPEL 7: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9463310
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993
--- Comment #1 from Denis Arnaud ---
Successful build on EPEL 7:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9463282
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
32 matches
Mail list logo
