[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 Bug 1215478 depends on bug 1279191, which changed state. Bug 1279191 Summary: Review Request: python-pyrfc3339 - pyRFC3339 parses and generates RFC 3339-compliant timestamps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279191 What

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 Bug 1215478 depends on bug 1286324, which changed state. Bug 1286324 Summary: Review Request: python-acme - Python libraries for use of the ACME protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286324 What|Removed

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 James Hogarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #36 from Matthew Miller --- > ok, do it. +1 -- Torrie, if you're still able to help, add yourself as a co-maintainer to James' (upcoming) new ticket. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #37 from Matthew Miller --- PS: as per comment #6 and others, I think the new request should be "letsencrypt", no hyphen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #38 from James Hogarth --- Found a few more runtime dependencies than described in #c7 ... going through something on my laptop to get something actually reviewable (right now it cannot pass review)...

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #34 from James Hogarth --- (In reply to Matthew Miller from comment #33) > This is awesome -- thanks everyone for working on this! I know it's > off-topic for the review per se, but would anyone be

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 Matthew Miller changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mat...@redhat.com

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #35 from Itamar Reis Peixoto --- (In reply to James Hogarth from comment #34) > If there are no complaints I'm happy to open the new package review > obsoleting this one... ok, do it. -- You are

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #28 from James Hogarth --- Well with my package now in rawhide I can pick this up too... Have some free time tonight whilst my little one refuses to sleep so putting together an initial stab at something

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 Bug 1215478 depends on bug 1198473, which changed state. Bug 1198473 Summary: Review Request: python-configargparse - A Python module with support for argparse, config files, and env variables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198473

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #27 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- I'd suggest that you continue. The OP hasn't responded since June, and he or she can always be a co-maintainer if he or she wants. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #26 from Itamar Reis Peixoto --- let wait a bit more if no reply we can take this and continue without him. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 James Hogarth changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1286324

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #29 from James Hogarth --- As a side issue I'm personally not too keen with conflating this package with python-acme and building both as part of the letsencrypt srpm ... I'm of the opinion this should

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #32 from James Hogarth --- Okay a few hours was optimistic ... going down some dependency pain getting a clean acme before I can test a clean letsencrypt ... It is en route - expect to see something

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #30 from Felix Schwarz --- acme should be definitively a separate package. When I updated the src.rpm I wasn't aware of the pypi releases which are separate. For the server specific packages, well I

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #31 from James Hogarth --- Okay let's work on that basis - if no one else has python-acme up by the time I get to that (say Sunday) I'll pop a package review request up for that too... -- You are

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #24 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos --- Sorry for not being able to promptly follow up. I believe all of the dependencies are now in. Would it make sense to start a new review request on letencrypt (I see Torie

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 Bug 1215478 depends on bug 998103, which changed state. Bug 998103 Summary: python-dialog-3.3.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998103 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 Nick changed: What|Removed |Added CC||n...@noodles.net.nz ---

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 James Hogarth changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1279191 ---

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@city-fan.org

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #21 from James Hogarth --- (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #20) > It *must* use the system one; in koji there is no external network access so > grabbing from pypi wouldn't work even if it wasn't

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 James Hogarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #19 from James Hogarth --- Actually that said it only uses pytz during %check not %build ... I'd suggest it should still use the system one rather than grab from pypi regardless though ... I'll put

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #15 from Dan Callaghan --- Torrie, are you still able to maintain this package? If not, I would be willing to take it. I'm sure there's plenty of others here willing to help as well. :-) -- You are receiving

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 Dan Callaghan changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #17 from Felix Schwarz --- (In reply to Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos from comment #14) > To add this in Fedora we certainly need a packager who is able to follow up > with the package. I'm willing to review

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 Till Maas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||opensou...@till.name

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #14 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos --- To add this in Fedora we certainly need a packager who is able to follow up with the package. I'm willing to review this, or any other review request if we have that. --

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Warmuz --- I would like to point out that Let's Encrypt team strongly suggests using tarballs from PyPI and not git master. https://github.com/letsencrypt/letsencrypt/wiki/Packaging -- You are

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 Felix Schwarz changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Warmuz --- Hey, Let's Encrypt Client dev over here. We would love to be RPM packaged! Can upstream help in any way? :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #7 from Richard Körber red...@ml.shredzone.de --- Some dependencies seem to be missing. On a clean F22 Server installation, I had to install another package and some Python pips to make the tool start: dnf install python-requests

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #8 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl --- argparse is in python itself. Don't know about the others. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 Sandro Mathys san...@mathys.io changed: What|Removed |Added CC||san...@mathys.io ---

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl --- Torrie, can you fix the things from comment 4 and post an updated version? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #3 from Torrie Fischer tdfisc...@hackerbots.net --- Specfile updated to address issues. New srpm: https://hackerbots.net/~tdfischer/rpm/lets-encrypt-0-1.git1d8281d.fc20.src.rpm And the script for generating tarballs from git:

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org --- Also, missing BuildRequires on python-setuptools. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product

[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|