https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(he...@kde.org)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #49 from Jonny Heggheim ---
I created a new package review, see bug #2149686. All the referenced spec/srpm
files gives me 404 and this ticket is still in review after 7 years.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||heg...@gmail.com
--- Comment #48
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #47 from soredake ---
https://github.com/source-foundry/Hack/issues/227#issuecomment-1107870671
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
Benson Muite changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benson_mu...@emailplus.org
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #45 from soredake ---
Any progress on this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@gmail.com
--- Comment #44 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #43 from Peter Oliver ---
> Has anything changed since 2018?
>
> Would Hack be a candidate for Fedora 34?
To make any progress I think we need someone enthusiastic enough to package the
Python fontmake tool and/or its outstanding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #42 from Or Schiro ---
Hi everyone,
Has anything changed since 2018?
Would Hack be a candidate for Fedora 34?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
Bug 1258542 depends on bug 1441023, which changed state.
Bug 1441023 Summary: Review Request: python-fontmake - Compile fonts from
sources to binary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441023
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #41 from Shawn Starr ---
Yes, this is where we are at and why I've not been able to move on this...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #40 from Jamie Mansfield ---
Huh, wasn't aware of the package builds running without network access - will
need to wait for fontmake to be introduced to a package then :S
At least the work is easily adaptable for when that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #38 from Jamie Mansfield ---
I've been working on getting Hack packaged in a satisfactory manor (I hope),
its not 100% working yet - trouble at the last step (always the way -_-).
My solution to the lack of a 'fontmake' package,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #39 from Adam Williamson ---
That's not acceptable under Fedora policies, I don't think. (As written it
simply would not *work*, either, when you tried an official package build, as -
by design - package builds run without network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #37 from Shawn Starr ---
Not forgotten... I am seeing the reviews blocking this are getting closer to
being done.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
Bug 1258542 depends on bug 1440971, which changed state.
Bug 1440971 Summary: Review Request: python-pyclipper - Cython wrapper for the
C++ translation of the Angus Johnson's Clipper library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440971
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #36 from Shawn Starr ---
Note:
https://github.com/source-foundry/Hack/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md
3.00 is released, but we're still blocked here...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
Shawn Starr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1440971
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #35 from Shawn Starr ---
This is currently blocked from our other dependencies needed for
python-fontmake and its sub-dependencies...
Upstream is appreciative in our efforts to get things packaged up.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
Peter Oliver changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1441023
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #34 from Shawn Starr ---
Upstream is changing how fonts are built now, which means we can use Open
Source tools to build them. I'm waiting for them to finish some of those bits
which are im progress right
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #33 from Jason Tibbitts ---
So I see this is still pending and I'm not completely sure why.
I understand that there's a desire to have these built from source, which
requires some additional dependencies.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #32 from Shawn Starr ---
I should have something soon, i'll put up a .spec for review this week.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
rugk <7d28c...@opayq.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||7d28c...@opayq.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #30 from Shawn Starr ---
Here is the tool can use to build the fonts
https://github.com/GoogleI18N/fontmake
We will need this packaged too as a dependency for building, if we want to
build them now.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #29 from Randy Barlow ---
Adam, fair enough.
Shawn, if you don't want to deal with the web files I'd be happy to handle that
part as a co-maintainer.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #28 from Shawn Starr ---
I've poked Chris on twitter, you can certainly help with packaging, it's always
good to have co-maintainers.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #27 from Adam Williamson ---
Well, there's still the *general* packaging guidelines to consider. I don't
think the font guidelines supersede those, in fact the section on packaging
from source specifically
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #26 from Randy Barlow ---
After reading the scrollback it does sound like Shawn is lined up to do the
review so I'll defer, but I'm happy to be a standin. I'll memorize my lines.
My interpretation of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #24 from Shawn Starr ---
I am in contact with upstream, they are looking at improving our ability to
build the fonts from scratch. More on this when they get back to me.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #23 from Peter Oliver ---
Upstream bug regarding building this font from source:
https://github.com/chrissimpkins/Hack/issues/227
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #22 from Adam Williamson ---
Debian is not inevitably 'freer' than Fedora. Our requirements are more strict
in some ways. Just because Debian doesn't (and, AFAICT, never has) required
fonts to be compiled from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #21 from Shawn Starr ---
Well, if it's acceptable to Debian surely this should be acceptable to Fedora,
if not something seems wrong with our policy...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #20 from Helio Chissini de Castro ---
Debian is using same approach as me, using the precompiled ttf/otf
The only thing is that we're deploying only ttf and debian both ones.
And i personally don't know if worth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #19 from Shawn Starr ---
Before we can even move to package this, does anyone know how this is built?
I've opened a ticket on upstream's github, Debian has this packaged but I don't
see them doing any
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #18 from Helio Chissini de Castro ---
Thanks Shawn.
This was strangely forgotten.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
Shawn Starr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #16 from Shawn Starr ---
I will do review since I want this font already. Expect a review for tomorrow.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been denied with the reason: Review not approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been denied with the reason: Review not approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been denied with the reason: Review not approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been denied with the reason: Review not approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been denied with the reason: Review not approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been denied with the reason: Review not approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
Helio Chissini de Castro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #9 from Shawn Starr ---
Any further update on this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #8 from Helio Chissini de Castro ---
Updated SPEC and SRPM
https://heliocastro.fedorapeople.org/hack/hack-fonts-2.018-1.fc23.src.rpm
https://heliocastro.fedorapeople.org/hack/hack-fonts.spec
Copr repo updated as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #7 from Shawn Starr ---
Where are we in this review? Upstream is excited to get Hack into Fedora.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
Fabio Alessandro Locati changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot ---
(In reply to Helio Chissini de Castro from comment #2)
> Yep
>
> They have the source, but no instructions how to build it whatsoever.
> I just followed the same process
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #3 from Arun Raghavan ---
Relevant: https://github.com/chrissimpkins/Hack/issues/85
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
--- Comment #2 from Helio Chissini de Castro ---
Yep
They have the source, but no instructions how to build it whatsoever.
I just followed the same process used on Overpass Red Hat font, which has the
source available, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
57 matches
Mail list logo