https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
Bugzilla account termination changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rjo...@redhat.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #17 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-bacon-colored_output. You may commit
to the branch "f28" in about 10 minutes.
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #16 from Ilya Gradina ---
(In reply to Roman Joost from comment #14)
> Alright went full cycle. Hope this helps?
Thanks, everything is works.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are al
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #15 from Ilya Gradina ---
(In reply to Roman Joost from comment #14)
> Alright went full cycle. Hope this helps?
Thanks Roman,
I corrected the spec:
new spec:
https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #14 from Roman Joost ---
Alright went full cycle. Hope this helps?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
Roman Joost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
Roman Joost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
Roman Joost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review+ |
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #13 from Ilya Gradina ---
(In reply to Roman Joost from comment #7)
> Approved. Many thanks!
Roman, could you maybe mark this as approved again?
Error: The Bugzilla bug's review was approved over 60 days ago
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #12 from Ilya Gradina ---
(In reply to Roman Joost from comment #7)
> Approved. Many thanks!
Hi, can I ask you clear and set again the flag approved?
I get this error:
(Error: The Bugzilla bug's review was approved over 60 days ag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #11 from Vít Ondruch ---
(In reply to Ilya Gradina from comment #10)
> Hi Vit,
> yes bacon not needed.
Thx.
But since rubygem-ast does not need this package for its build, do you still
want to import it into Fedora? If the answer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #10 from Ilya Gradina ---
Hi Vit,
yes bacon not needed.
new spec:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/master/rubygems/rubygem-bacon-colored_output.spec
new srpm:
https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #9 from Vít Ondruch ---
BTW the BR: rubygem(bacon) is probably not required, because there is no test
suite enabled ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about cha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
Vít Ondruch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vondr...@redhat.com
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
Roman Joost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Roma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #6 from Roman Joost ---
Diff against the old review:
--- ../1268742-rubygem-bacon-colored_output_old/review.txt 2017-07-28
09:46:15.738517634 +1000
+++ review.txt 2017-07-31 10:37:06.139563839 +1000
@@ -74,6 +74,17 @@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #5 from Roman Joost ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Gradina ---
(In reply to Roman Joost from comment #3)
> To me it looks all fine, except that in the mean time a newer version has
> been released (sorry :(). Is it possible to update or is there a strong
> reason to st
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #3 from Roman Joost ---
To me it looks all fine, except that in the mean time a newer version has been
released (sorry :(). Is it possible to update or is there a strong reason to
stick with the current version?
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #2 from Roman Joost ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
Roman Joost changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Gradina ---
New Spec:
https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-bacon-colored_output.spec
New SRPM:
https://github.com/ilgrad/fedora-packages/raw/master/rubygems/rubygem-bacon-colored_output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268742
Ilya Gradina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1268744
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
24 matches
Mail list logo