https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
Bug 1271193 depends on bug 1381892, which changed state.
Bug 1381892 Summary: Review Request: osgi-core - OSGi Core API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381892
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/osgi-compendium
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #14 from Tom "spot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
--- Comment #13 from gil cattaneo ---
Blocker:
[?]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
Waiting for Fedora Legal r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #12 from gil catt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
Referenced Bugs:
h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
Assignee|no
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||Reopened
Status|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Blocks|182235 (FE-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tcall...@redhat.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
Referenced Bugs:
h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
--- Comment #8 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
Some notes:
1) OSGi API can be consider part of specification, which is non-free.
Downloading APIs from upstream page requires accepting non-free license.
Upstream website does not have a separate lice
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
--- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo ---
Seem using
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/osgi/osgi.cmpn/6.0.0/osgi.cmpn-6.0.0-sources.jar
mssing some xsd files
osgi.cmpn-6.0.0/xmlns/app/v1.0.0/app.xsd
osgi.cmpn-6.0.0/xmlns/app/v1.1.0/app.xsd
osgi.cm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
--- Comment #6 from Michael Simacek ---
(In reply to Mikolaj Izdebski from comment #4)
> I share doubts wit Gil. I remember that code from OSGi Alliance used to be
> non-free and that's why we don't ship any code from them in Fedora. The
> tar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
Mat Booth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mat.bo...@redhat.com
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
--- Comment #4 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
I share doubts wit Gil. I remember that code from OSGi Alliance used to be
non-free and that's why we don't ship any code from them in Fedora. The tarball
used in SRPM under review indicates that it may
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
Michael Simacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1256132
--- Comment #2 from Michael
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271193
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mizde...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1
23 matches
Mail list logo