https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/skopeo
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
Nalin Dahyabhai changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #25 from Nalin Dahyabhai ---
Yup, looks good from here. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #24 from Antonio Murdaca ---
Updated everything and it should be good to go:
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/runcom/fedora-pkgs/master/skopeo/fedora/skopeo/skopeo.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/runcom/fedora-pkgs/ra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #23 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
runcom's scratch build of skopeo-0.1.4-1.fc23.src.rpm for f23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12786664
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
Nalin Dahyabhai changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #22 from Nalin Dahyabhai ---
Looks good, though the -devel package contains sources in package "main". My
guess is that you wanted to leave with_devel set to 0 all the time.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #21 from Nalin Dahyabhai ---
(In reply to Antonio Murdaca from comment #16)
> I've created https://github.com/runcom/fedora-pkgs where I do have .spec(s)
> and SRPM(s)
> I'm planning to remove the .spec from the source repo and mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
Antonio Murdaca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(amurdaca@redhat.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
Jan Chaloupka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amurd...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #18 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
runcom's scratch build of skopeo-0.1.4-1.fc23.src.rpm for f23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12722010
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #17 from Antonio Murdaca ---
New stuff (v0.1.4) after Nalin's review:
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/runcom/fedora-pkgs/master/skopeo/fedora/skopeo/skopeo.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/runcom/fedora-pkgs/raw/maste
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #16 from Antonio Murdaca ---
(In reply to Nalin Dahyabhai from comment #15)
> runcom is not currently in the packagers group; I can sponsor.
>
> I've got questions about the license tag when we're bundling, and could
> probably us
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
Nalin Dahyabhai changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Blocks|177841 (F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #15 from Nalin Dahyabhai ---
runcom is not currently in the packagers group; I can sponsor.
I've got questions about the license tag when we're bundling, and could
probably use some clarification about whether or not, and if so, h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #14 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
runcom's scratch build of skopeo-0.1.3-1.fc23.src.rpm for f23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12716275
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #13 from Antonio Murdaca ---
Pulled in the latest Jan's fixes to the spec (thanks a lot)
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/runcom/fedora-pkgs/master/skopeo/fedora/skopeo/skopeo.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/runcom/fe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
runcom's scratch build of skopeo-0.1.3-1.fc23.src.rpm for f23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12716264
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #11 from Antonio Murdaca ---
Jan, Lokesh, I should have fixed everything now.
The only thing which doesn't work is removing the `cd $(pwd)/_build/...)` stuff
in %install (as Jan suggested me to do) because I believe it is tied to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
runcom's scratch build of skopeo-0.1.3-0.1.git572a6b6.fc23.src.rpm for f23
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12713132
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #9 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Some of them are already packaged, just with a different name.
> should this binary have a golang(...)-like name resolvable via golang(...)
> macro?
No. golang(...) virtual provides is used only for dep
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #8 from Antonio Murdaca ---
(In reply to Jan Chaloupka from comment #7)
> btw. a lot of new dependencies :)
>
> $ gofed repo2spec --detect github.com/runcom/skopeo --with-build --with-extra
> Repo URL: github.com/runcom/skopeo
> C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #7 from Jan Chaloupka ---
btw. a lot of new dependencies :)
$ gofed repo2spec --detect github.com/runcom/skopeo --with-build --with-extra
Repo URL: github.com/runcom/skopeo
Commit: 572a6b6f537d71f7cabfdcfe185c6d7cb4367272
Name: go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #6 from Jan Chaloupka ---
Wondering if it would be better to create github repository (e.g.
fedora/golang-reviews) and instead of posting links to spec to post links to
pull request and comment in the PR. Missing feature to comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #5 from Antonio Murdaca ---
(In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #4)
> Ohh btw, I feel it'd be best first moved to projectatomic github before we
> go ahead with approving this, the only reason being moving from @runcom to
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dwa...@redhat.com
--- Comment #4 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
runcom's scratch build of skopeo-0.1.2-0.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12661563
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #2 from Antonio Murdaca ---
I've released a new version, and I've made sure distro-supplied golang libs are
used when possible (in spec), the only leftover are (from gofed):
Class: github.com/docker/distribution (golang-github-doc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
runcom's scratch build of skopeo-0.1.1-1.fc23.src.rpm for f23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12661477
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301143
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jchal...@redhat.com,
33 matches
Mail list logo
