[Bug 1302809] Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor

2021-03-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru TASAKA --- (In reply to Sebastiano Vigna from comment #16) > Bummer, I might be biased but I'd love to see ne in Fedora :). > Debian/Ubuntu/OpenBS/HomeBrew have a package since a long time. As this review request i

[Bug 1302809] Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor

2021-03-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 Sebastiano Vigna changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vi...@di.unimi.it --- Comment #16

needinfo canceled: [Bug 1302809] Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor

2020-08-09 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Package Review has canceled Package Review 's request for Brandon Thomas 's needinfo: Bug 1302809: Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 --- Comment #15 from Pack

[Bug 1302809] Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor

2016-07-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added CC|anto.tra...@gmail.com | Flags|needinfo?(bthomasz

[Bug 1302809] Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor

2016-03-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Blocks|

[Bug 1302809] Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor

2016-02-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bthoma...@gmail.com Flags

[Bug 1302809] Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor

2016-02-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 --- Comment #11 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to Brandon Thomas from comment #10) > Thanks! Let me know how this looks. > > Spec URL: > http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/bthomas/ne/ne-editor.git/tree/ > ne.spec?id=ed3485452bd

[Bug 1302809] Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor

2016-02-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 --- Comment #10 from Brandon Thomas --- Thanks! Let me know how this looks. Spec URL: http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/bthomas/ne/ne-editor.git/tree/ne.spec?id=ed3485452bd4f741fd1ed058944f849c0d960f11 SRPM URL: https://copr-be.c

[Bug 1302809] Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor

2016-02-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 --- Comment #8 from Brandon Thomas --- For now I changed the name too "ne-editor" and made the other recommended changes. One thing that maybe should be considered is that other distributions (Arch, Ubuntu, Gentoo) call it "ne", but I'm not su

[Bug 1302809] Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor

2016-02-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 --- Comment #9 from Antonio Trande --- - You don't use macros yet: rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/bin mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/ne/syntax mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/ne/macros mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_i

[Bug 1302809] Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor

2016-02-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 --- Comment #7 from Petr Šabata --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #6) > It's not strange neither bad, just not easily recognizable during a > searching. Who does not know 'ne', can easily understand what it is already > by '-editor'

[Bug 1302809] Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor

2016-02-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 --- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #5) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #4) > > (In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #3) > > > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #1) > > > > - Very sho

[Bug 1302809] Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor

2016-02-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 --- Comment #5 from Petr Šabata --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #4) > (In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #3) > > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #1) > > > - Very short name; can you consider to use 'ne-editor' as packa

[Bug 1302809] Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor

2016-02-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 --- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #3) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #1) > > - Very short name; can you consider to use 'ne-editor' as package name? > Hmm, I'm curious -- why is this an is

[Bug 1302809] Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor

2016-02-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added CC||psab...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1302809] Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor

2016-01-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 Mamoru TASAKA changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Comment

[Bug 1302809] Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor

2016-01-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 --- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande --- - Very short name; can you consider to use 'ne-editor' as package name? Name:ne-editor Version: 3.0.1 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Nice text editor - Source0 is a complete link to the

[Bug 1302809] Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor

2016-01-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug 1302809] Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor

2016-01-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 Brandon Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced