https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
pseudo-1.8.1-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
pseudo-1.8.1-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #20 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/pseudo
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #19 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #18)
> (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #17)
> > (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #16)
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #18 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #17)
> (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #15)
> > if getfattr --help >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> > xattr_runs=true
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #17 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #15)
> if getfattr --help >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> xattr_runs=true
>
>
> hmm, then don't drop it.
As I said, it's
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #15 from Igor Gnatenko ---
if getfattr --help >/dev/null 2>&1; then
xattr_runs=true
hmm, then don't drop it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #14 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #13)
> As I can see, not all bits were applied from patch which I attached...
>
> > BuildRequires: attr
> not removed,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #13 from Igor Gnatenko ---
As I can see, not all bits were applied from patch which I attached...
> BuildRequires: attr
not removed, it's useless BR
> sed -i -e "/s,@ARCH_FLAGS@/s|,|!|g" configure
I don't
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #12 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/pseudo/pseudo.spec
SRPM URL:
https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/pseudo/pseudo-1.8.1-1.fc24.src.rpm
* Sun
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #11 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
Sorry, I've been busy with other stuff. I'll try to spin a new package this
weekend.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #10 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #9)
> Thanks for the patches. I'm against using sed instead of patches, it won't
> fail when patch no longer applies.
In my
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #9 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
Thanks for the patches. I'm against using sed instead of patches, it won't fail
when patch no longer applies.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #8 from Igor Gnatenko ---
Created attachment 1195641
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1195641=edit
[PATCH] man: Add NAME section
Used patch from spec
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #7 from Igor Gnatenko ---
Created attachment 1195640
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1195640=edit
Proposed patch for spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #6 from Igor Gnatenko ---
> Version: 1.7.5
1.8.1 is the latest.
> Source0: pseudo-%{version}.tar.xz
https://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/pseudo/pseudo-1.8.1.tar.bz2
> Source2:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #5 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #1)
> > Can you use the name pseudoroot for package and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #4 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #1)
> Can you use the name pseudoroot for package and binary? I think pseudo is a
> too generic name and pseudoroot would
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #3 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski ---
It looks like bug 134647 is taken already, but I'll happily review something
else for you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
--- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner ---
Are you interest in a review swap with bug #1346457?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
26 matches
Mail list logo