https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352666
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Pod-Constants-0.19-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352666
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Pod-Constants-0.19-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352666
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352666
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Pod-Constants-0.19-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352666
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352666
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Pod-Constants-0.19-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a729c1a1c4
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352666
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Pod-Constants
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352666
--- Comment #5 from Sandro Mani ---
Upstream is quick :)
"License is Artistic version 2, I forgot to update the README when I made
the previous release.
I will make a new release tomorrow which fixes the README and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352666
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352666
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
Issues (non blocking):
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352666
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352666
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352666
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1352667
13 matches
Mail list logo