https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370868
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
wildfly-arquillian-1.0.2-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370868
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370868
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370868
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370868
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
wildfly-arquillian-1.0.2-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2ed5685e9b
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370868
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/wildfly-arquillian
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370868
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370868
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
Thanks for the review!
create new SCM request/s:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7580
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/7581
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370868
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370868
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/wildfly-arquillian.spec
SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/wildfly-arquillian-1.0.2-2.fc24.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370868
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #2)
> Issues
> ==
> 1. The spec file URL in the bug differs from the spec file inside the srpm.
>See the diff below.
Done
> 2. Some files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370868
--- Comment #2 from Jerry James ---
Issues
==
1. The spec file URL in the bug differs from the spec file inside the srpm.
See the diff below.
2. Some files in this package have an ASL 2.0 license notice, and some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370868
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370868
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1181081
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370868
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)
15 matches
Mail list logo