https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-QtPy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
--- Comment #14 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Thanks for the review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
--- Comment #13 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #12)
> Remain these problems:
> [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
> Note: Checking patched
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo ---
Remain these problems:
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
--- Comment #11 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #8)
> Maybe you could add %doc CHANGELOG.md README.md for each pythonX sub packages
done.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
--- Comment #10 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #9)
> have time for this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380140 ?
> thanks in advance
Yes of couse. Taken,
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo ---
have time for this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380140 ?
thanks in advance
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo ---
Maybe you could add %doc CHANGELOG.md README.md for each pythonX sub packages
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
--- Comment #6 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Well, changed Source URL anyway ... :)
Spec URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages/python-QtPy/python-QtPy.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
--- Comment #5 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
I am using this format ...
Source0: https://github.com/OWNER/%{name}/archive/%{commit0}.tar.gz basically
...
also, this is the same tarball -
$ sha256sum
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Please, use https://github.com/spyder-ide/qtpy/archive/v1.1.2/qtpy-1.1.2.tar.gz
Otherwise you should use the approach shown here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
--- Comment #3 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Also fixed most issues .. hopefully.
Spec URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages/python-QtPy/python-QtPy.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
--- Comment #2 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
hmm ... pypi tarball does not have the license. I will fix these and upload new
spec and srpm tomorrow.
sorry about the delay.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379091
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
18 matches
Mail list logo