[Bug 1440384] Review Request: latte-dock - Latte is a dock based on plasma frameworks

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440384 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED

[Bug 1440384] Review Request: latte-dock - Latte is a dock based on plasma frameworks

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440384 --- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/latte-dock -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are

[Bug 1440384] Review Request: latte-dock - Latte is a dock based on plasma frameworks

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440384 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: Latte-Dock |Review Request:

[Bug 1440384] Review Request: Latte-Dock - Latte is a dock based on plasma frameworks

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440384 --- Comment #8 from Marc Deop --- New update addressing Rex requests Spec URL: https://marcdeop.fedorapeople.org/latte-dock.spec SRPM URL: https://marcdeop.fedorapeople.org/latte-dock-0.6.2-2.fc25.src.rpm I am not

[Bug 1440384] Review Request: Latte-Dock - Latte is a dock based on plasma frameworks

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440384 --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter --- Sorry for the extended delay... naming: 1. SHOULD consider naming in lower case, see also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming?rd=Packaging:NamingGuidelines dependencies:

[Bug 1440384] Review Request: Latte-Dock - Latte is a dock based on plasma frameworks

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440384 --- Comment #6 from Marc Deop --- Yet another update: Spec URL: https://marcdeop.fedorapeople.org/Latte-Dock.spec SRPM URL: https://marcdeop.fedorapeople.org/Latte-Dock-0.6.2-1.fc25.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1440384] Review Request: Latte-Dock - Latte is a dock based on plasma frameworks

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440384 --- Comment #5 from Marc Deop --- Updated the package to latest version: Spec URL: https://marcdeop.fedorapeople.org/Latte-Dock.spec SRPM URL: https://marcdeop.fedorapeople.org/Latte-Dock-0.6.1-1.fc25.src.rpm -- You are

[Bug 1440384] Review Request: Latte-Dock - Latte is a dock based on plasma frameworks

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440384 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1440384] Review Request: Latte-Dock - Latte is a dock based on plasma frameworks

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440384 --- Comment #3 from Marc Deop --- Update: Following Rex's recommendation, removed the desktop-file-validate as it might lead to false positives -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1440384] Review Request: Latte-Dock - Latte is a dock based on plasma frameworks

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440384 --- Comment #2 from Marc Deop --- Update: - Removed DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=%{_usr} as is set already by the macro %{cmake_kf5} - Added a comment to make obvious the desktop-file-validate is unneeded for some files Thanks

[Bug 1440384] Review Request: Latte-Dock - Latte is a dock based on plasma frameworks

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440384 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu

[Bug 1440384] Review Request: Latte-Dock - Latte is a dock based on plasma frameworks

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440384 --- Comment #1 from Marc Deop --- Output from fedora-review: Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items =