[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper-1.22-1.fc26 qca-2.1.3-6.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ab577a520a

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 --- Comment #13 from Rex Dieter --- I'm skeptical, but I guess I'll take your word for it. If that is true, it is even more unfortunate the compat-openssl10-devel maintainer chose to not make it parallel-installable

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 --- Comment #12 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #11) > I think any situation where both are linked is asking for trouble and should > be avoided at all costs (I'm fairly certain

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 --- Comment #11 from Rex Dieter --- I think any situation where both are linked is asking for trouble and should be avoided at all costs (I'm fairly certain versioned symbols won't help there either... *namespaced*

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 --- Comment #10 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #9) > (Or am I missing something?) I believe you are. A binary can link to both of them due to variable library dependencies. The

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 --- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter --- (Or am I missing something?) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter --- Only if a binary links both of them, and that should never happen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 --- Comment #7 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #5) > Re: comment 3 > > lower... like 0? I'd assumed that had been used before, and didn't want to > risk it. As far symbol

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nmavr...@redhat.com

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter --- Re: comment 3 lower... like 0? I'd assumed that had been used before, and didn't want to risk it. As far symbol versioning, that's only really required if the soname stays the same,

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 --- Comment #4 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos --- or instead of using the soname you can rename the library to libpkcs11-helper-compat.so.xx (same xx as before), and link libpkcs11-helper.so to that library. -- You are

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nmavr...@redhat.com

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 --- Comment #3 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos --- I'd also recommend to go lower rather than higher in the ABI soname, and you would have to use versioned symbols to prevent conflicts with programs linking to both versions

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter --- Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=19199789 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1444994

[Bug 1445349] Review Request: compat-openssl10-pkcs11-helper - A library for using PKCS#11 providers

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445349 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1391544, 1423077,