https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #25 from Hannes Frederic Sowa ---
Thanks, Filipe, that is awesome of you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #23 from Filipe Rosset ---
(In reply to Hannes Frederic Sowa from comment #21)
> I just requested the appropriate branches (again). Let's see. I try to push
> them asap.
Hi Hannes, I pushed to all current
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #24 from Filipe Rosset ---
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=24577
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
Filipe Rosset changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #21 from Hannes Frederic Sowa ---
I just requested the appropriate branches (again). Let's see. I try to push
them asap.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #20 from Dave Love ---
I expected it to be built for all the current releases, and the review bug to
get auto-closed.
(I was actually after it for EPEL.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
Hannes Frederic Sowa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #18 from Dave Love ---
Why hasn't this been finished off? I was expecting to be able to install it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #17 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/datamash
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
Hannes Frederic Sowa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #15 from José Matos ---
Now that the package is approved the author suggests that a new release (1.2)
will follow soon. :-)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #13 from José Matos ---
I am the reviewer. :-)
And I was happy to see the discussion.
One note, when you update the spec file you should update the release number.
That helps the reviewer (and is present in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #12 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Hannes Frederic Sowa from comment #11)
> Ping. Dave, do you have any other comments?
Not more that it builds on el6 (the koji el6-candidate target, though I used
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #11 from Hannes Frederic Sowa ---
Ping. Dave, do you have any other comments?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #10 from Hannes Frederic Sowa ---
Sorry for the late reply. I was on the road for some time.
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #9)
> Of course you can use the changes. I don't think it's necessary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #9 from Dave Love ---
Of course you can use the changes. I don't think it's necessary to attribute
changes from a review, and they're not copyright-significant.
Have you seen the discussion on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #8 from Hannes Frederic Sowa ---
Hi,
(In reply to Dave Love from comment #6)
> (In reply to Hannes Frederic Sowa from comment #5)
> > Do I need to add a version to bundled(gnulib)? rpmlint complains
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #7 from Dave Love ---
Created attachment 1295270
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1295270=edit
spec patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #6 from Dave Love ---
(In reply to Hannes Frederic Sowa from comment #5)
> Do I need to add a version to bundled(gnulib)? rpmlint complains right now.
Yes, I noticed that. You can't add a version, as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #5 from Hannes Frederic Sowa ---
I updated the files in place.
I changed:
* removed info from BR
* added perl(Digest::MD5) perl(Digest::SHA) perl(Data::Dumper) to BR
* added Provides: bundled(gnulib)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #4 from Hannes Frederic Sowa ---
(In reply to José Matos from comment #2)
> Taking care of the review.
>
> According to fedora-review the package has the following issues:
>
> - Provides:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
Dave Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
José Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1466961
--- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti ---
*** Bug 1466960 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
26 matches
Mail list logo