[Bug 1473320] Review Request: vkmark - Vulkan benchmarking suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320 --- Comment #19 from Yanko Kaneti --- ugh I mean honcho as in Package administrator, not hocho :) Please login in pkgdb and sort out your permissions for vkmark if I've missed something. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1473320] Review Request: vkmark - Vulkan benchmarking suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320 --- Comment #18 from Yanko Kaneti --- (In reply to c72578 from comment #17) > Dear Yanko, > I would contribute as a co-maintainer of f26 and older, if it is OK from > your side. Thanks for volunteering. I've added f26 and

[Bug 1473320] Review Request: vkmark - Vulkan benchmarking suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320 --- Comment #17 from c72...@yahoo.de --- Dear Yanko, I would contribute as a co-maintainer of f26 and older, if it is OK from your side. - Concerning the versioning and releases I got the following info from Alexandros Frantzis: This .MM

[Bug 1473320] Review Request: vkmark - Vulkan benchmarking suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320 Yanko Kaneti changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1473320] Review Request: vkmark - Vulkan benchmarking suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320 --- Comment #15 from Gwyn Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/vkmark -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are

[Bug 1473320] Review Request: vkmark - Vulkan benchmarking suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320 c72...@yahoo.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from

[Bug 1473320] Review Request: vkmark - Vulkan benchmarking suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320 --- Comment #13 from c72...@yahoo.de --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel

[Bug 1473320] Review Request: vkmark - Vulkan benchmarking suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320 --- Comment #12 from Yanko Kaneti --- Right, should have probably said "mesa has no vulkan drivers on s390x" I am not seeing myself investigating the s390x test failures anytime soon. So its either ExcludeArch, or someone

[Bug 1473320] Review Request: vkmark - Vulkan benchmarking suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320 --- Comment #11 from c72...@yahoo.de --- Thanks for the update. It is a few tests, which are failing on s390x https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5948/20755948/build.log test cases: 14 | 13 passed | 1 failed assertions: 176 | 173

[Bug 1473320] Review Request: vkmark - Vulkan benchmarking suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320 --- Comment #10 from Yanko Kaneti --- 2017.07-0.5.20170725gitaa0de26 - ExcludeArch s390x for now SPEC: http://declera.com/~yaneti/vkmark/vkmark.spec SRPM:

[Bug 1473320] Review Request: vkmark - Vulkan benchmarking suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320 --- Comment #9 from Yanko Kaneti --- 2017.07-0.4.20170725gitaa0de26 - Vulkan backend only available on x86_64, condition the mesa-vulkan-devel SPEC: http://declera.com/~yaneti/vkmark/vkmark.spec SRPM:

[Bug 1473320] Review Request: vkmark - Vulkan benchmarking suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320 --- Comment #8 from c72...@yahoo.de --- mesa-vulkan-devel is only available for x86_64. See results of Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20753589 This means, that other architectures have to be excluded using

[Bug 1473320] Review Request: vkmark - Vulkan benchmarking suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320 c72...@yahoo.de changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|c72...@yahoo.de Flags|

[Bug 1473320] Review Request: vkmark - Vulkan benchmarking suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320 --- Comment #6 from Yanko Kaneti --- 2017.07-0.3.20170725gitaa0de26 - Add %%check, running the meson tests, as per review (#1473320) http://declera.com/~yaneti/vkmark/vkmark.spec

[Bug 1473320] Review Request: vkmark - Vulkan benchmarking suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320 --- Comment #5 from c72...@yahoo.de --- vkmark includes tests. Could you please include them in the %check section of the spec file. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#.25check_section Tests are here after building:

[Bug 1473320] Review Request: vkmark - Vulkan benchmarking suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320 --- Comment #4 from Yanko Kaneti --- (In reply to c72578 from comment #3) > Wed Jul 25 2017 -> Tue Jul 25 2017 Thanks. Fixed in place -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are

[Bug 1473320] Review Request: vkmark - Vulkan benchmarking suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320 --- Comment #3 from c72...@yahoo.de --- Wed Jul 25 2017 -> Tue Jul 25 2017 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1473320] Review Request: vkmark - Vulkan benchmarking suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320 --- Comment #2 from Yanko Kaneti --- Thanks 2017.07-0.2.20170725gitaa0de26 - Add date to the revision, as per review (#1473320) http://declera.com/~yaneti/vkmark/vkmark.spec

[Bug 1473320] Review Request: vkmark - Vulkan benchmarking suite

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473320 c72...@yahoo.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c72...@yahoo.de --- Comment #1 from