[Bug 1480794] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Format for describing upgrade scenarios

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480794 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- ocaml-cudf-0.9-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1480794] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Format for describing upgrade scenarios

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480794 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1480794] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Format for describing upgrade scenarios

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480794 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- ocaml-cudf-0.9-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1480794] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Format for describing upgrade scenarios

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480794 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1480794] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Format for describing upgrade scenarios

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480794 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- ocaml-cudf-0.9-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-7d578e4fb3 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1480794] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Format for describing upgrade scenarios

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480794 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- ocaml-cudf-0.9-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-bc16507ec8 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1480794] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Format for describing upgrade scenarios

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480794 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST

[Bug 1480794] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Format for describing upgrade scenarios

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480794 Ben Rosser changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1486068

[Bug 1480794] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Format for describing upgrade scenarios

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480794 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-cudf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1480794] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Format for describing upgrade scenarios

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480794 --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin --- You're right I've missed it, I usually look at the %global at the beginning of the file and didn't see the one in the middle of it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1480794] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Format for describing upgrade scenarios

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480794 --- Comment #3 from Ben Rosser --- Thanks for the review! I don't wish to sound ungrateful, but I think you missed something: > %define libname %(echo %{name} | sed -e 's/^ocaml-//') It is preferred to use "global"

[Bug 1480794] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Format for describing upgrade scenarios

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480794 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST

[Bug 1480794] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Format for describing upgrade scenarios

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480794 Ben Rosser changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) | Referenced

[Bug 1480794] Review Request: ocaml-cudf - Format for describing upgrade scenarios

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480794 Ben Rosser changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1183826, 1185099,