[Bug 1489494] Review Request: mock-core-configs - Mock core config files basic chroots

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489494 Sergio Monteiro Basto changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1489494] Review Request: mock-core-configs - Mock core config files basic chroots

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489494 --- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mock-core-configs. You may commit to the branch "f27" in about 10 minutes. -- You are

[Bug 1489494] Review Request: mock-core-configs - Mock core config files basic chroots

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489494 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ---

[Bug 1489494] Review Request: mock-core-configs - Mock core config files basic chroots

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489494 --- Comment #9 from Miroslav Suchý --- Sigh. You are cruel. :) Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/mock-core-configs.spec SRPM URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/mock-core-configs-27.2-1.fc26.src.rpm -- You are

[Bug 1489494] Review Request: mock-core-configs - Mock core config files basic chroots

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489494 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(ngomp...@gmail.co |

[Bug 1489494] Review Request: mock-core-configs - Mock core config files basic chroots

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489494 --- Comment #8 from Neal Gompa --- > Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Change this to the URL, and then I will okay this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are

[Bug 1489494] Review Request: mock-core-configs - Mock core config files basic chroots

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489494 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|

[Bug 1489494] Review Request: mock-core-configs - Mock core config files basic chroots

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489494 --- Comment #6 from Miroslav Suchý --- > dnf/rpm/libdnf from scriptlet. It's worst thing ever! I agree with dnf/rpm. Can you elaborate why not libdnf? Especially this import hawkey;

[Bug 1489494] Review Request: mock-core-configs - Mock core config files basic chroots

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489494 --- Comment #5 from Igor Gnatenko --- Please, don't run dnf/rpm/libdnf from scriptlet. It's worst thing ever! Also don't use hawkey directly, it will be retired soon-ish. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1489494] Review Request: mock-core-configs - Mock core config files basic chroots

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489494 --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý --- Yes. There is python3-hawkey, which in past used hawkey C API, but now it uses libdnf. DNF team just decided that it is not needed to change the python name. The functionality stays

[Bug 1489494] Review Request: mock-core-configs - Mock core config files basic chroots

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489494 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com

[Bug 1489494] Review Request: mock-core-configs - Mock core config files basic chroots

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489494 --- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa --- (In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #1) > hawkey was retired in F26 ! in my f25 run [1], give me x86_64 , why not use > `uname -m` ? > > > [1] > python3 -c "import dnf.rpm;

[Bug 1489494] Review Request: mock-core-configs - Mock core config files basic chroots

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489494 Sergio Monteiro Basto changed: What|Removed |Added CC|