https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
--- Comment #21 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich ---
(In reply to Philip Kovacs from comment #20)
> I'm happy to build for EPEL7 also.
You are the owner. You can do it already.
So I'l just wait for it though.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
--- Comment #20 from Philip Kovacs ---
I'm happy to build for EPEL7 also.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
Philip Kovacs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
--- Comment #19 from Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich ---
Philip, clear the Blocks section of request please as you are not needed to be
sponsored anymore.
PS
Sorry for the spam, missed that in prev comment.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kryz...@ispms.ru
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System ---
slurm-17.02.8-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
Philip Kovacs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
Resolution|RAWHIDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
slurm-17.02.8-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a746d91931
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
Philip Kovacs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
--- Comment #14 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slurm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
--- Comment #13 from Philip Kovacs ---
OK I'm sponsored. Thank you tibbs. Will move this ticket along soon.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
--- Comment #12 from Philip Kovacs ---
I was hoping to maintain the Fedora side of things, if I get sponsored. I have
plans to work with openmpi and get that package integrated with these new slurm
packages. It's exciting to get slurm going f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
--- Comment #11 from Adam Huffman ---
Hi Philip,
Many thanks for working on this.
May I ask whether you're planning on creating an EL7 branch?
If not, I'm happy to create one and maintain it.
Cheers,
Adam
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
--- Comment #9 from Philip Kovacs ---
Latest spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pkovacs/fedora-slurm/master/slurm.spec
Latest SRPM:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/pkfed/slurm/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00602696-slurm/slur
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
--- Comment #8 from Philip Kovacs ---
After a discussion on an upstream forum, it's clear to me now that adding a
dedicated slurm user with a static uid is not the best approach for this
package.
We don't to make incorrect assumptions about ho
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
--- Comment #7 from Philip Kovacs ---
I pushed that last little change you requested (remove rm -rf %{buildroot}).
I've also open a ticket with the packaging committee to try and get a dedicated
uid/gid for slurm. Let's see how they respond.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
>Do we need to request a reservation of uid/gid from the FPC?
I think so.
- rm -rf %{buildroot} is unneeded in %install too.
The rest is good.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
--- Comment #5 from Philip Kovacs ---
Hi Robert-Andre,
Thanks for helping with this one.
I made the changes that you asked:
- removed the defattr's
- removed the %clean section
- removed unneeded Requires: ldconfig
- added %systemd_requires
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
Christopher Brown changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.br...@pnnl.gov
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489668
Philip Kovacs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: Slurm |Review Request: slurm - HPC
22 matches
Mail list logo