https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System ---
timeshift-18.1.1-4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
timeshift-18.1.1-4.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
timeshift-18.1.1-4.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System ---
timeshift-18.1.1-4.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
timeshift-18.1.1-4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
timeshift-18.1.1-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
timeshift-18.1.1-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
timeshift-18.1.1-4.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-2034535a48
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
timeshift-18.1.1-4.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f67cb13026
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
timeshift-18.1.1-4.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-132058f52d
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
Björn 'besser82' Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
timeshift-18.1.1-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-c4a955e60b
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
timeshift-18.1.1-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d465f39a50
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
timeshift-18.1.1-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e8ccaa9e31
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #13 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/timeshift
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #11 from srakitnican ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/srakitnican/default/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00705772-timeshift/timeshift.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
>_is this implemented anywhere yet, or there are still some places where it is
>expected to be in /usr/share/appdata.
I don't know to be honest.
The guidelines always reflect
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #9 from srakitnican ---
After looking more carefully it was indeed changed [1]. Since upstream is
installing this file, I am wondering how this should be approached. Should I
suggest upstream to change
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #8 from srakitnican ---
Hmm, metainfo is for add-on packages or "components". It should not be present
ordinarily if application does not provide one. Appdata is used to describe the
application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- I missed something:
%{_datadir}/appdata/*.appdata.xml
New guidelines say Appdata files must be installed in %{_datadir}/metainfo/
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #6 from srakitnican ---
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/srakitnican/default/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00705513-timeshift/timeshift.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
>or
> * (at your option) any later version
Timeshift author choose the later version.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #4 from srakitnican ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3)
> (In reply to srakitnican from comment #2)
> >
> > I am confused about that one, I've added this file because it is the only
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to srakitnican from comment #2)
>
> I am confused about that one, I've added this file because it is the only
> text that describes the actual license used (GPLv2+).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
--- Comment #2 from srakitnican ---
Thank you for your review!
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - I don't think it's necessary to add Debian packaging files, remove
> %license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
30 matches
Mail list logo